296 Couquiaudbirth and <strong>in</strong> supervis<strong>in</strong>g calves while the motheris hunt<strong>in</strong>g or div<strong>in</strong>g to great depths where calvescannot follow (Johnson & Norris, 1986; Evans,1987). In captivity, the oldest, parturient female<strong>of</strong>ten is observed to be the “focal po<strong>in</strong>t on whichthe social activity <strong>of</strong> the tank is centred” (Tavolga,1966, quoted <strong>in</strong> Johnson & Norris, 1986, p. 338).Sexual segregation occurs commonly <strong>in</strong> dolph<strong>in</strong>schools (Norris & Dohl, 1980). Many oceanic cetaceanjuvenile males form separate groups, and adultmales travel alone, <strong>in</strong> tightly bonded pairs, or <strong>in</strong>small groups, jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the basic social group for briefperiods, primarily for breed<strong>in</strong>g purposes (Sweeney,1990; Wells & Scott, 1999). In some populations,bonds between males <strong>of</strong> similar age develop early <strong>in</strong>life, and pair bonds may be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed for 20 yearsor more (Wells & Scott, 1999). Males and femalesalso may form sex-segregated alliances when theyencounter resources and cooperate <strong>in</strong> competitionfor these resources with other conspecifics (Connoret al., 2000a, 2000b).Play, courtship, and sexual behaviours have animportant role <strong>in</strong> the social life <strong>of</strong> whales and dolph<strong>in</strong>sand are probably more developed <strong>in</strong> captivitys<strong>in</strong>ce the time dedicated to the feed<strong>in</strong>g is reducedand travel<strong>in</strong>g is suppressed. Play is commonly seenamong young animals and may serve as learn<strong>in</strong>gand practice progress. Adults also play with youngstersor among themselves. They frequently leap,chase each other, or engage <strong>in</strong> preludes <strong>of</strong> courtship.Social and sexual behaviours are carriedout throughout life, and they probably functionnot only <strong>in</strong> courtship, but as a means to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>familiarity between group members (Evans, 1987).These behaviours are sometimes directed towardsother species and humans. Other social behaviours<strong>in</strong>clude altruistic and care-giv<strong>in</strong>g behaviours. Itmay take the form <strong>of</strong> cooperation such as collectivefood herd<strong>in</strong>g, assistance to a sick animal, “stand<strong>in</strong>gby” when a school mate is captured, rescueand defence <strong>of</strong> a threatened member <strong>of</strong> the group,and the assistance given by the mother to her calf(Johnson & Norris, 1986). <strong>Care</strong>-giv<strong>in</strong>g behaviourhas been observed <strong>in</strong> captivity among speciessuch as the bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>, the pilot whale, thecommon dolph<strong>in</strong>, and the Pacific white-sided dolph<strong>in</strong>,and between <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>of</strong> different species(Defran & Pryor, 1980; Johnson & Norris, 1986).For other detailed and recent sources on cetaceanlife, behaviour, and physiology, please refer toReeves et al. (1999), Reynolds & Rommel (1999),Mann et al. (2000), and Perr<strong>in</strong> et al. (2002).Possible Impact <strong>of</strong> Controlled Environment onBehaviourLife <strong>in</strong> a controlled environment may impede certa<strong>in</strong>aspects <strong>of</strong> normal social dynamics. Aggressivehierarchical dom<strong>in</strong>ance may be naturallyoccurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the wild, but <strong>in</strong> captivity, it can disruptthe group and harm subord<strong>in</strong>ates (Geraci, 1986b).The situation <strong>in</strong> captivity is altered because adultmales <strong>in</strong>teract permanently with the social unit.Dom<strong>in</strong>ance hierarchies can be established <strong>in</strong> bothsexes. Large adult males can dom<strong>in</strong>ate other poolmates,and the largest and oldest females maydom<strong>in</strong>ate younger or smaller males and females(Östman, 1991; Samuels & Gifford, 1997; Wells& Scott, 1999). In captivity, this male dom<strong>in</strong>anceis <strong>of</strong>ten the source <strong>of</strong> many social and behaviouralproblems, especially related to juvenileswith<strong>in</strong> the social group (Johnson & Norris, 1986;Sweeney, 1990). The aggression <strong>of</strong>ten reported<strong>in</strong> adult male bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s towards <strong>in</strong>fantsand juveniles <strong>in</strong> captivity may reflect a tendencyon the part <strong>of</strong> such adults to herd the young whenthreatened <strong>in</strong> the wild. This behavior may escalate<strong>in</strong>to obsessive hostility <strong>in</strong> captivity where theyoung can neither escape nor be buffered from themale by a tightly packed crowd <strong>of</strong> adults (Johnson& Norris, 1986). S<strong>in</strong>ce they are unable to leavethe area to avoid the situation, stress, psychological,and physical trauma can occur. Attempts tosolve problems caused by dom<strong>in</strong>ance or othercompatibility problems <strong>in</strong> the enclosure are challeng<strong>in</strong>g.These disruptions also can be caused bythe fact that some <strong>of</strong> the animals may have beenremoved from their orig<strong>in</strong>al social structure, separatedfrom family members or a social unit, andnow have to adjust to a new social environment.Many surveyed facilities emphasized the importance<strong>of</strong> recreat<strong>in</strong>g an adequate social structure<strong>in</strong> captivity, especially by avoid<strong>in</strong>g mix<strong>in</strong>g adultmales together <strong>in</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> females or adultmales with new juvenile males, and by provid<strong>in</strong>gample space and a multiple pool complex toallow separation and escape. In the wild, verticallyorganised swimm<strong>in</strong>g arrangements havebeen seen among groups <strong>of</strong> pantropical spotteddolph<strong>in</strong>s, Pacific white-sided dolph<strong>in</strong>s, and bottlenosedolph<strong>in</strong>s, and <strong>in</strong> captivity, among sp<strong>in</strong>nerdolph<strong>in</strong>s. It has been hypothesised that these weredom<strong>in</strong>ance arrangements, expressed as priority <strong>of</strong>access to the surface (Herman & Tavolga, 1980;Norris & Dohl, 1980; Johnson & Norris, 1986;Pryor, 1995). I have made similar observations <strong>in</strong>a dolph<strong>in</strong>arium <strong>in</strong> Japan about bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>sand false killer whales liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a restricted space.In a crowded square tank, the dom<strong>in</strong>ant animal, alarge adult male bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>, was alwaysseen swimm<strong>in</strong>g closer to the surface and to theedge <strong>of</strong> the tank, enjoy<strong>in</strong>g the optimal swimm<strong>in</strong>gsurface available and hav<strong>in</strong>g to make little effortto surface to breathe. Below him <strong>in</strong> the hierarchywas an adult female false killer whale that alsoenjoyed the upper layer and the outer periphery<strong>of</strong> the tank. The lowest rank<strong>in</strong>g animals, a
2. Whales, Dolph<strong>in</strong>s, and Porpoises: Presentation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Cetaceans</strong> 297juvenile female false killer whale and a juvenilemale bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>, always swam nearthe bottom <strong>of</strong> the tank and nearer to the centre.They were constantly displaced by other animalsand heavily marked with tooth rakes. Wheneverthey came to the surface to breathe, they returnedimmediately to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the pool.Although stereotypy has not clearly been demonstratedfor cetaceans <strong>in</strong> captivity, some behaviourstend to occur when space is limited; theenvironment does not provide occupational activity;and when animals are kept alone, deprived <strong>of</strong>stimulus diversity, or are subject to environmentalstress. It is generally true that the smaller thehabitat, the more likely the animal is to behavestereotypically (Gygax, 1993; Carlstead, 1996);however, the shape also plays a role. Variedshapes and enriched environment where animalshave opportunities to forage, play, and socializewith conspecifics and escape aggressive behaviourswill greatly reduce chances <strong>of</strong> stereotypicalbehaviours.In captivity, not all cetacean species have beenkept rout<strong>in</strong>ely or with equal success. Additionally,the ease <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a species <strong>in</strong> a tank seemsto reflect, <strong>in</strong> part, the ecological characteristics <strong>of</strong>the natural habitat <strong>of</strong> the species. It is not surpris<strong>in</strong>gthat species-specific behaviours will be largelyma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed across diverse environments andcircumstances. Some populations <strong>of</strong> bottlenosedolph<strong>in</strong>s, accustomed to shallow, coastal waters,f<strong>in</strong>d it easier to adjust to tank conditions, whereasopen-ocean pelagic species, such as the Dall’s porpoise,that travel long distances <strong>in</strong> the wild, seemto have much greater difficulty <strong>in</strong> adapt<strong>in</strong>g to thetank environment (Defran & Pryor, 1980).Although most countries forbid the capture <strong>of</strong>wild cetaceans, there is an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number <strong>of</strong>new public facilities display<strong>in</strong>g cetaceans <strong>in</strong> countrieswith less str<strong>in</strong>gent regulations. This may leadto the exhibition <strong>of</strong> species <strong>in</strong>frequently or neverpreviously displayed. Animals from strand<strong>in</strong>gs,which are kept for long-term rehabilitation orthat cannot be released for medical reasons, alsocan belong to species never before kept <strong>in</strong> humancare. Bear<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, the Cetacean SpeciesInformation Table (Table 2.3) was compiled topresent several environmental, physiological,and behavioural parameters for all species kept<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions that can be useful <strong>in</strong> the design <strong>of</strong>their environment.Introduction to theCetacean Species Information TableThe United States, Australia, and some EuropeanUnion countries such as the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom,France, and Sweden (Kl<strong>in</strong>owska & Brown, 1986)developed strict regulations regard<strong>in</strong>g mar<strong>in</strong>emammal display, handl<strong>in</strong>g, medical care, transportation,and hous<strong>in</strong>g (see the “Regulatory Officesand Organisms” section <strong>in</strong> Chapter 8). Many othercountries have rules that are either legally too broadto be applied, or they lack the executive means toenforce them. Therefore, exhibit dimensions andquality, life support system requirements, medicalcare, and husbandry can tremendously vary amongcountries. In the United States, the standards forthe ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e mammals <strong>in</strong> researchor display facilities are regulated by the Animaland Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)under the U.S. Animal Welfare Act (Anonymous,1979-1984, 1995; Corkeron, 2002). “Facilitiesand Operat<strong>in</strong>g Standards,” “Animal Health andHusbandry Standards,” and “TransportationStandards,” on which several other countries havebased their own regulations, provide m<strong>in</strong>imumrequirements for enclosure sizes and volume <strong>of</strong>water, and recommendations for humane handl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> animals and transportation methods. Sizerecommendations have been calculated on theanimals’ Average Adult Length (AAL) (roughestimates <strong>of</strong> AAL <strong>in</strong> feet that are then multiplied<strong>in</strong> meters). Although it is not stated <strong>in</strong> the regulations,it has been suggested that the species differentiation<strong>in</strong>to two categories was made accord<strong>in</strong>gto their <strong>in</strong>shore or pelagic habitat.The fact that calculations are made on AAL issubject to discussion as <strong>in</strong>dividual animals maygreatly exceed it. In some cases, the discrepancymay be a meter or more. For architects and planners,it would be more logical to base pool andenclosure dimensions on the maximum knownadult body length, or Maximum Adult Length(MAL). This would ensure that animals are givenample space to display natural behaviours. I suggestthat the MAL <strong>of</strong> the largest sex <strong>of</strong> the largestspecies housed <strong>in</strong> a pool be used to estimate theappropriate dimensions. Table 2.3 provides MALby species and sex.Although the classification <strong>of</strong> species accord<strong>in</strong>gto their habitat is justified, it is no longeradequate <strong>in</strong> regards to recent research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.For example, species like the Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>,false killer whale, and pilot whale are known tobe pelagic, yet they are classified with <strong>in</strong>shorespecies; while <strong>in</strong>shore species, such as the f<strong>in</strong>lessporpoise, are classified with <strong>of</strong>fshore species. Thisclassification was made at a time when little wasknown about many cetacean species <strong>in</strong> the wild.In the follow<strong>in</strong>g table, species have not been classifiedaccord<strong>in</strong>g to their habitat, but its descriptionis <strong>in</strong>cluded. Planners are encouraged to exceedlegal m<strong>in</strong>imum size recommendations <strong>in</strong> surfacearea, depth, and volume, especially for speciesdescribed as pelagic and gregarious.
- Page 3 and 4: Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 279-28
- Page 7 and 8: Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 283-28
- Page 9 and 10: 1. Introduction 285of Architecture,
- Page 11 and 12: on the physiology, behavior, and he
- Page 13 and 14: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 15 and 16: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 17 and 18: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 19: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 23 and 24: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 25 and 26: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 27 and 28: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 29 and 30: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 31 and 32: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 33 and 34: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 35 and 36: Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 311-31
- Page 37 and 38: 3. Survey of International Cetacean
- Page 39 and 40: 3. Survey of International Cetacean
- Page 41 and 42: 3. Survey of International Cetacean
- Page 43 and 44: 3. Survey of International Cetacean
- Page 45 and 46: 4. Types and Functions of Pools and
- Page 47 and 48: 4. Types and Functions of Pools and
- Page 49 and 50: welfare: Marine mammals (9 CFR Part
- Page 51 and 52: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 53 and 54: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 55 and 56: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 57 and 58: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 59 and 60: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 61 and 62: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 63 and 64: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 65 and 66: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 67 and 68: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 69 and 70: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 71 and 72:
5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 73 and 74:
5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 75 and 76:
Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 351-36
- Page 77 and 78:
6. Life Support Systems 353sometime
- Page 79 and 80:
6. Life Support Systems 355al., 199
- Page 81 and 82:
6. Life Support Systems 357from coa
- Page 83 and 84:
6. Life Support Systems 359antimicr
- Page 85 and 86:
6. Life Support Systems 361contact
- Page 87 and 88:
6. Life Support Systems 363Dierauf,
- Page 89 and 90:
7. Food and Fish House 365in its se
- Page 91 and 92:
7. Food and Fish House 367establish
- Page 93 and 94:
7. Food and Fish House 369Figure 7.
- Page 95 and 96:
Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 371-38
- Page 97 and 98:
8. Husbandry 373Figure 8.3. Milk sa
- Page 99 and 100:
8. Husbandry 375reintroducing a new
- Page 101 and 102:
8. Husbandry 377Rescue and Rehabili
- Page 103 and 104:
8. Husbandry 379Appendix II include
- Page 105 and 106:
8. Husbandry 381& R. J. Harrison (E
- Page 107 and 108:
Appendix 383Dolphinarium YaltaDolph
- Page 109:
Appendix 385Aomori Prefectural Asam
- Page 113:
Subscription Rates forAquatic Mamma