312 CouquiaudThe greatest progression <strong>of</strong> new facilities was <strong>in</strong>Mexico. There are possibly many more facilities<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Russia, and other former Soviet Unionrepublics where military facilities were numerousand, when they closed down, they sold their animalsto display facilities. There are also several travel<strong>in</strong>gshows <strong>in</strong> Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, and probablyother South American and Asian countries.The follow<strong>in</strong>g map (Figure 3.1) shows therecorded facilities <strong>in</strong> 1997. The map clearly showsthat a large majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions are located <strong>in</strong>the Northern hemisphere, <strong>in</strong> warm and temperateclimates between latitude 20º N—just below theTropic <strong>of</strong> Cancer—and 60º N. They are ma<strong>in</strong>lycoastal. The two countries with the longest history<strong>of</strong> exhibit<strong>in</strong>g cetaceans also have the largest number<strong>of</strong> facilities: the United States and Japan. Each have39 display and research <strong>in</strong>stitutions.ResultsForty-four questionnaires were received over aperiod <strong>of</strong> 12 months from 22 countries, represent<strong>in</strong>g28% <strong>of</strong> the questionnaires sent.Participation from Asia was better than thatfrom North America, despite the language barrier.Participation from the Pacific region was good, andcountries <strong>in</strong> Europe were fairly well represented.This gives a wide geographical representation and,thus, enables comparisons <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> facilitiesacross a broad range <strong>of</strong> geographical locations.This survey helped to identify and understandvarious elements essential to the dolph<strong>in</strong>s’ welfare<strong>in</strong> their controlled environments. It enabled thestudy <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities around the world, whichprovided new <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to previously unknownfacilities <strong>in</strong> countries where language, communication,development, or economical factors <strong>of</strong>tenprevent them from participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the active<strong>in</strong>formation exchange <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ternational mar<strong>in</strong>emammal pr<strong>of</strong>essional community.The ma<strong>in</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the study are given <strong>in</strong> thefollow<strong>in</strong>g section. They are all based on the statisticalanalysis <strong>of</strong> the survey data, except the sectionon cetacean species <strong>in</strong> captivity, which <strong>in</strong>cludesa comparison between the survey results and theentire database.Temporal Distribution <strong>of</strong> Cetacean FacilitiesThe temporal distribution <strong>of</strong> sampled facilities wasexam<strong>in</strong>ed to determ<strong>in</strong>e if the sample <strong>of</strong> surveyedfacilities was representative <strong>in</strong> construction dateand age and, therefore, would produce accurate<strong>in</strong>formation on questions related to design trends,construction techniques, and so on.Construction dates <strong>of</strong> sampled facilities (n =41) ranged from the early 1950s to the late 1990s(Figure 3.2). Construction was present <strong>in</strong> everydecade between 1950 and 2000; however, alldecades were not represented equally (KruskalWallis, H = 37.976, p < 0.0001). Many sampledfacilities were built <strong>in</strong> the late 1960s and <strong>in</strong> the1990s. The late 1960s period corresponded to thefirst surge <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> dolph<strong>in</strong>s—at the time <strong>of</strong>the Flipper TV series <strong>in</strong> the USA and Europe.The 1990s period witnessed a second surge <strong>of</strong>Figure 3.1. World map <strong>of</strong> cetacean facilities <strong>in</strong> 1997 (<strong>in</strong>dicated by a black dot)
3. <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> International Cetacean Facilities 313<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> dolph<strong>in</strong>s and whales due to dolph<strong>in</strong>therapy, whale watch<strong>in</strong>g, and so on. This periodsaw the creation <strong>of</strong> numerous SWTD facilities,ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> Central America, the Caribbean Islands,and Southern Europe, as well as new display facilities<strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries—especially <strong>in</strong> Asia.1950 - 19591960 - 19691970 - 19791980 - 19891990 - 2000Figure 3.2. Temporal distribution <strong>of</strong> cetacean facilities’construction datesThe temporal distribution <strong>of</strong> sampled facilitiesgives a good representation <strong>of</strong> old and new facilities,cover<strong>in</strong>g a wide variety <strong>of</strong> types and designs;therefore, the results give <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to problemsassociated with the age <strong>of</strong> the facility. It is alsopossible to trace the evolution <strong>of</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> thedesign <strong>of</strong> cetacean environments.Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cetaceans</strong> per FacilitiesPrevious censuses did not determ<strong>in</strong>e the averagenumber <strong>of</strong> cetaceans per facility (Cornell& Asper, 1978; Defran & Pryor, 1980; Collet,1984; Asper et al., 1988, 1990; Duffield & Wells,1990; Duffield & Shell, 1994, 1996; Nakahara &Takemura, 1997). Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the average number<strong>of</strong> animals per facility is relevant to understand<strong>in</strong>gthe pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitutions, the possible impacton the social composition <strong>of</strong> the group, and theimpact on ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and f<strong>in</strong>ancial issues.The median number <strong>of</strong> cetaceans per facilityis 7 (maximum = 39). Among sampled facilities(n = 42), 26% had < 5 animals and 45% <strong>of</strong> allsampled facilities had between 5 and 10 animals(Figure 3.3).It is likely that the high ma<strong>in</strong>tenance andoperational costs associated with keep<strong>in</strong>g a largenumber <strong>of</strong> animals dictates the extent <strong>of</strong> the collection.A very large number <strong>of</strong> animals might not<strong>in</strong>crease the number <strong>of</strong> visitors substantially. Fivefacilities have only two animals, which is consideredthe absolute m<strong>in</strong>imum group size s<strong>in</strong>ce keep<strong>in</strong>gs<strong>in</strong>gle animals should be avoided. It should behighlighted that three <strong>of</strong> these five facilities areresearch <strong>in</strong>stitutions and, therefore, might haveeither f<strong>in</strong>ancial or scientific reasons for keep<strong>in</strong>gsuch a small number <strong>of</strong> animals.Figure 3.3. Number <strong>of</strong> cetaceans per facility0 - 45 - 910 - 1415 - 1920 - 2425 - 2930 - 40Cetacean Species <strong>in</strong> CaptivityThe facilities database enables a census <strong>of</strong> cetaceanspecies <strong>in</strong> captivity. At the time <strong>of</strong> the survey,21 species—all odontocetes—were kept <strong>in</strong> humancare. This represents approximately 30% <strong>of</strong> the 72species <strong>of</strong> odontocetes. Among the 21 species, 6species were kept <strong>in</strong> only one facility. Results showthat the bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>, the Pacific white-sideddolph<strong>in</strong>, the beluga whale, the killer whale, andthe false killer whale are the species most commonlykept <strong>in</strong> captivity, which is <strong>in</strong> accordancewith the results <strong>of</strong> the regularly updated NorthAmerican census (Cornell & Asper, 1978; Asperet al., 1988, 1990; Duffield & Shell, 1994, 1996).Table 3.1 shows the number <strong>of</strong> facilities display<strong>in</strong>geach species <strong>of</strong> cetaceans as <strong>of</strong> 1997. Datadisplayed <strong>in</strong> this table are not limited to surveyedfacilities but are extracted from the whole database.Information on species was available for 144<strong>of</strong> the 166 facilities (87%) <strong>in</strong> the database.The bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> is the most commonlydisplayed species on all cont<strong>in</strong>ents. This species isdisplayed <strong>in</strong> 89% <strong>of</strong> the facilities, with or withoutother species.The species variety was compared betweenAsian, North American, and European facilitiesfrom the data available <strong>in</strong> the facilities database(Figure 3.4).In 1997, Europe had 41 facilities <strong>in</strong> 17 countries,and data on the species were available for 35<strong>of</strong> those. European <strong>in</strong>stitutions displayed a total <strong>of</strong>7 species. The median number <strong>of</strong> species per facilitywas 1 (maximum = 4). Results showed that83% <strong>of</strong> the facilities only display 1 species, and94% displayed the bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> as a s<strong>in</strong>glespecies or with other species.North America had 44 facilities <strong>in</strong> four countries(The Bahamas and Bermuda were <strong>in</strong>cluded),and data on the species were available for all <strong>of</strong>them. Results showed that North American <strong>in</strong>stitutionsdisplay a total <strong>of</strong> 12 species, which is <strong>in</strong>general concordance with the 11 species <strong>in</strong> thelatest update <strong>of</strong> the North American census, albeit
- Page 3 and 4: Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 279-28
- Page 7 and 8: Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 283-28
- Page 9 and 10: 1. Introduction 285of Architecture,
- Page 11 and 12: on the physiology, behavior, and he
- Page 13 and 14: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 15 and 16: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 17 and 18: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 19 and 20: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 21 and 22: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 23 and 24: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 25 and 26: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 27 and 28: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 29 and 30: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 31 and 32: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 33 and 34: 2. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises:
- Page 35: Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 311-31
- Page 39 and 40: 3. Survey of International Cetacean
- Page 41 and 42: 3. Survey of International Cetacean
- Page 43 and 44: 3. Survey of International Cetacean
- Page 45 and 46: 4. Types and Functions of Pools and
- Page 47 and 48: 4. Types and Functions of Pools and
- Page 49 and 50: welfare: Marine mammals (9 CFR Part
- Page 51 and 52: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 53 and 54: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 55 and 56: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 57 and 58: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 59 and 60: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 61 and 62: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 63 and 64: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 65 and 66: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 67 and 68: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 69 and 70: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 71 and 72: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 73 and 74: 5. Architectural Design of Pools an
- Page 75 and 76: Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 351-36
- Page 77 and 78: 6. Life Support Systems 353sometime
- Page 79 and 80: 6. Life Support Systems 355al., 199
- Page 81 and 82: 6. Life Support Systems 357from coa
- Page 83 and 84: 6. Life Support Systems 359antimicr
- Page 85 and 86: 6. Life Support Systems 361contact
- Page 87 and 88:
6. Life Support Systems 363Dierauf,
- Page 89 and 90:
7. Food and Fish House 365in its se
- Page 91 and 92:
7. Food and Fish House 367establish
- Page 93 and 94:
7. Food and Fish House 369Figure 7.
- Page 95 and 96:
Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(3), 371-38
- Page 97 and 98:
8. Husbandry 373Figure 8.3. Milk sa
- Page 99 and 100:
8. Husbandry 375reintroducing a new
- Page 101 and 102:
8. Husbandry 377Rescue and Rehabili
- Page 103 and 104:
8. Husbandry 379Appendix II include
- Page 105 and 106:
8. Husbandry 381& R. J. Harrison (E
- Page 107 and 108:
Appendix 383Dolphinarium YaltaDolph
- Page 109:
Appendix 385Aomori Prefectural Asam
- Page 113:
Subscription Rates forAquatic Mamma