Pornography: Men Possessing Women, by: Andrea ... - Feminish

In a study specifically of force used against adult females by males,the objective scientists introduce the female put off by gentleness,the female who wants to be “treated a little roughly, ” the femalewho cannot be satisfied without the use of force. Since “[a] standardgambit in feminine flirtation is to irritate the male and provoke himinto physical contact. . . , ”91 it is hard to blame the male even forusing gross force against the female—hurting her, hitting her,physically overpowering her: nonobjective persons not scientistssometimes call it “rape. ” So the scientists do not blame him or evenhold him responsible for his own behavior. The masochistic femalewith her low sex drive or inhibitions or morals who pretends toresist or is actually but unjustifiably unwilling is in fact the oneresponsible for the harm done to her, which is not really harm,since she is used in an appropriate way because she is female.The destiny of the woman who does not want it—moralistic orinhibited or with a low sex drive—is the familiar female destinybecause underneath is the masochist who does want it, with force.T he destiny of the woman who does not want it—a superficialcharacterization of her, since underneath she does want it or wouldif she were not moralistic or inhibited—is precisely the same as thedestiny of the harlot who provokes in order to be forced. T hefemale is never entitled not to want sex. Force used against herwhen she refuses is always warranted because she is never eitherjustified or serious in not wanting sex. No authentic idea of bodilyintegrity is ever hers to claim or to have. Force does not violate heror victimize her because force is nature’s way of giving her what shereally wants. Force is nature’s victory over the constraints ofcivilization. Force is intrinsic to male sexuality and force usedagainst her does not victimize her; it actualizes her. The objectivescientists and the pornographers agree: she wants it hard, she wantsit rough, she provokes it because she likes it; and even the sexualapathy posited by Kinsey simply establishes another reason todisregard her will because an assertion of will on her part—bydefinition, refusal—is a misrepresentation of her own sexual nature,which is fulfilled when she is sexually used by the male to satisfyhim, especially in coitus.