From Persecution to Prison - Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of ...
From Persecution to Prison - Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of ...
From Persecution to Prison - Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
esults <strong>of</strong> the exams. Nevertheless, “when the exact age is uncertain, thechild should be given the benefit <strong>of</strong> the doubt.” 172In contrast, the INS defends its use <strong>of</strong> dental X-rays by invoking fearsabout public safety and terrorist attacks: “What if a terrorist who was 19said he was 16 and an orphan and the s<strong>to</strong>ry didn’t check out, but wereleased him and he went out and blew up a building? Would it be hisat<strong>to</strong>rney that would take the fall? I don’t think so.” 173 Yet the BushAdministration’s INS Commissioner acknowledged the controversy surroundingthe exams; in early 2002, he announced that the agency wasreviewing the age assessment policy. 174 Because <strong>of</strong> the variability <strong>of</strong> theseexams, both the US State Department and the Health and Human ServicesDepartment have s<strong>to</strong>pped using the exams. 175The US legal system recognizes the necessity <strong>of</strong> treating immigrantminors distinct from adults, a necessity delineated also in internationallaw. 176 In fact, in the Homeland Security Act, Congress moved responsibility<strong>for</strong> unaccompanied minors <strong>to</strong> the Health and Human Services Department,instead <strong>of</strong> keeping it with the Department <strong>of</strong> Homeland Security, which hasassumed other functions <strong>of</strong> the INS. 177 Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, most <strong>of</strong> the 5300 childrenin INS cus<strong>to</strong>dy were held in secure detention facilities, <strong>of</strong>ten with juvenilesin the criminal justice system, according <strong>to</strong> a report published inFebruary 2003. 178 The Homeland Security Act encourages Office <strong>of</strong> RefugeeResettlement (ORR) <strong>to</strong> use the refugee children foster care system <strong>for</strong> theplacement <strong>of</strong> unaccompanied minors, 179 but it is still unclear whether thiswill change the detention practices <strong>of</strong> the federal government.International standards clearly prioritize the best interests <strong>of</strong> the child,and detention does not serve those interests. “Minors who are asylumseekers should not be detained,” according <strong>to</strong> the UNHCR. 180 “Because172UNHCR, Refugee Children Guidelines, Chapt. 8, Sec. I173Solomon, A. Kids in Captivity: Scared and Alone, Nearly 5000 Children Wind Up in INSDetention Each Year, The Village Voice, February 27-March 5, 2002, quoting INSSpokesperson Karen Kraushaar.174INS, James W. Ziglar Speaking at National Immigration Forum, February 1, 2002. Availableat www.ins.usdoj.gov/graphics/ziglarnif.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2002.175Elsner, Dentist Settles Fate; Elsner, Harsh Fate.176UNHCR’s Guidelines on applicable Criteria and Standards relating <strong>to</strong> the Detention <strong>of</strong>Asylum Seekers, 1999 [UNHCR Guidelines]Guideline 6: Detention <strong>of</strong> Persons under the Age<strong>of</strong> 18 years, citing the UNHCR Refugee Children Guidelines and the Convention on theRights <strong>of</strong> the Child.177The Homeland Security Act, 2002 (PL 107-296) [Homeland Security Act].178Chris Nugent, The INS Detention Standards: Facilitating Legal Representation andHumane Conditions <strong>of</strong> Confinement <strong>for</strong> Immigration Detainees, Immigration CurrentAwareness Newsletter <strong>of</strong> the National Lawyers Guild, Feb. 3, 03 [Nugent, INS Detention]179US Committee <strong>for</strong> Refugees, Refugee Reports, Volume 24, Number 1 January/February2003AGE DETERMINATIONS/DENTAL EXAMINATIONS 133