10.07.2015 Views

From Persecution to Prison - Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of ...

From Persecution to Prison - Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of ...

From Persecution to Prison - Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

XI. LEGAL STANDARDSIntroductionThe treatment <strong>of</strong> asylum seekers documented in this report violates guidingprinciples <strong>of</strong> international law covering the right <strong>to</strong> asylum and thedetention <strong>of</strong> asylum seekers. Furthermore, the treatment documented inthis report also violates international agreements and standards governingthe conditions <strong>for</strong> detained asylum seekers and more broadly the conditions<strong>of</strong> prisoners, detainees and others in confinement.This section highlights key components <strong>of</strong> two aspects <strong>of</strong> the law pertinent<strong>to</strong> this study: 1) international and US law governing the authority <strong>to</strong>detain asylum seekers and 2) international and US standards governing theconditions <strong>of</strong> such detention. Both <strong>of</strong> these fields are complex and subject<strong>to</strong> debate. However, there are some clear overarching laws and standardsrecognized by the US, and US policies violate some <strong>of</strong> these. The purpose <strong>of</strong>this discussion is <strong>to</strong> provide sufficient background on these principles inorder <strong>to</strong> place the findings <strong>of</strong> this study in a meaningful legal context.In general, the findings in this report demonstrate that the discrepancybetween US law and standards and those established under internationallaw has produced, and will continue <strong>to</strong> produce, substantial harm <strong>to</strong> thehealth <strong>of</strong> those seeking safe haven in the United States from <strong>to</strong>rture andother <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> persecution.Grounds <strong>for</strong> Detaining Asylum SeekersInternational human rights law and US policy covering the authority <strong>to</strong>detain refugees and asylum seekers have taken separate and <strong>of</strong>ten divergentpaths over the past fifty years. By the turn <strong>of</strong> the millennium, the twobodies <strong>of</strong> law had arrived at antithetical conclusions <strong>for</strong> asylum seekerswho arrive without proper documentation. Under international standards,detention <strong>of</strong> asylum seekers is “inherently undesirable,” even <strong>for</strong> thosearriving at a nation’s borders without “satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry” documentation, andshould be imposed only in narrow circumstances <strong>of</strong> “necessity.” 185 In con-185United Nations High Commissioner <strong>for</strong> Refugees’ Guidelines on applicable Criteria andStandards relating <strong>to</strong> the Detention <strong>of</strong> Asylum Seekers, 1999, Introduction, Secs. 1, 2[UNHCR Guidelines] (citing The Geneva Convention <strong>of</strong> 28 July 1951 Relating <strong>to</strong> the Status<strong>of</strong> Refugees and UNHCR Executive Committee Conclusion, No. 44 (on Detention <strong>of</strong>Refugees and Asylum Seekers) 1986 [UNHCR ExComm 44].LEGAL STANDARDS 155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!