10.07.2015 Views

Summary Report - pdf - Department of Families, Housing ...

Summary Report - pdf - Department of Families, Housing ...

Summary Report - pdf - Department of Families, Housing ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With the exception <strong>of</strong> storytelling, children were morelikely to undertake these activities in areas <strong>of</strong> lowerlevels <strong>of</strong> isolation (Figure 27). Children in areas <strong>of</strong> higherisolation were 13.6 percentage points more likely to havehad a story told to them than those in areas <strong>of</strong> no orlow isolation. Children whose primary carer had a higherlevel <strong>of</strong> education (a university qualification or Year 12certificate) were as likely to have had a story told to themin the previous week regardless <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> isolation.However, the children <strong>of</strong> parents with lower levels <strong>of</strong>education were more likely to have a story told to themif they lived in areas <strong>of</strong> moderate to extreme isolation.Interestingly, the number <strong>of</strong> children’s books in thehousehold (reported in wave 2) did not make a significantdifference to the likelihood <strong>of</strong> children having a story toldto them. However, it did make a difference in the uptake<strong>of</strong> the other three activities. Children who did notparticipate in the other activities were more likely to haveon average fewer books in the house than those childrenwho did participate.A comparison <strong>of</strong> the likelihood <strong>of</strong> engaging in theseactivities with the number <strong>of</strong> hours <strong>of</strong> television watchingshows that there is no significant impact. Children whoengaged in one or more <strong>of</strong> these activities tended towatch similar levels <strong>of</strong> television as shown in the previoussection. Furthermore, children who did not engage in any<strong>of</strong> these activities were also found to watch televisionin the same proportions across low, moderate and highlevels <strong>of</strong> viewing as those who did undertake the activities.In a separate set <strong>of</strong> questions, children in the K cohortwere asked directly whether they liked various activities.Table 55 shows that girls were much more likely than boysto enjoy reading books and drawing but both boys andgirls enjoyed making things.Figure 27: Percentage <strong>of</strong> children doing activities by LORI, per centTable 55: Study children’s enjoyment <strong>of</strong> non-physical activities, per centYes Sometimes NoActivity Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys GirlsMaking things 90.2 91.7 4.6 4.9 5.3 3.4Drawing pictures 85.7 93.2 7.2 5.3 7.2 1.5Reading books 74.8 87.6 9.0 5.6 16.2 6.866 Footprints in Time: The Longitudinal Study <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Children | Key <strong>Summary</strong> <strong>Report</strong> from Wave 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!