10.07.2015 Views

Value Beyond Cost Savings - Green Building Finance Consortium

Value Beyond Cost Savings - Green Building Finance Consortium

Value Beyond Cost Savings - Green Building Finance Consortium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Value</strong> <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>Savings</strong>: How to Underwrite Sustainable Propertiesrelated economic or functional obsolescence. As sustainable considerations increase inprominence, valuer sales comparison analysis, lease/rental comparables analysis, operatingexpense analysis, etc. for non-sustainable properties will have to appropriately considersustainability.5. Fundamental Valuation Methodologies Do Not Need to ChangeThe fundamental approaches to value, in most cases, do not need to change. Fortunately,discounted cash flow analysis (Income Approach) is well suited to deal with thechallenges of integrating the new information and “sub-financial” analyses necessary toaccurately assess the implications of sustainability on value. <strong>Value</strong>rs will need to thinkabout the world, and properties a bit differently, but the changes required, whilesignificant, are analogous to changes necessary to deal with globalization, outsourcing,warehousing and industrial sector technology changes, the Internet, significantdemographic transformations, and the increased technology component of buildings. Forthese game-changing trends, valuers just had to get smarter, and do some new types ofanalysis without changing fundamental methods, and sustainability is no different.A few areas that need to evolve include building performance measurement, propertydescriptions (for both subject properties and comparables), and enhanced considerationand presentation of risks. 776. Sustainable Valuation Must Look <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>Cost</strong>sValuation is critical to sustainable property investment. To date, most sustainable propertyinvestment decisions have been based on simple-payback or simple return on investmentanalyses that factor in development costs and operating cost savings, but fail to properlyconsider revenue and risk implications. This failure to properly integrate revenue and riskconsiderations has contributed to bad decisions historically, but with recent (since 2008)dramatic increases in the demand for sustainable/energy efficient properties by regulators,space users and investors, the problem has escalated. Relying on such practices in thefuture will erode the quality of sustainable property investment decisions further.Regulator, space user, and investor demand are critical to value, as discussed throughout<strong>Value</strong> <strong>Beyond</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>Savings</strong>: How to Underwrite Sustainable Properties and illustratedbelow in Exhibit V-9. If valuers only consider resource use (energy costs, etc.) and ignorethe affect of sustainable property investment on market demand, key value issues affectingentitlements, rents, cap rates and other issues would be ignored. In essence, revenue andrisk considerations would not factor into decision-making, a recipe for long-termunderperformance.77 It could be argued that these are fundamental changes in methodology, but we see them more as data andpresentation issues rather than changes in basic methods.140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!