10.07.2015 Views

An Anti-Oppression Framework for Child Welfare in Ontario

An Anti-Oppression Framework for Child Welfare in Ontario

An Anti-Oppression Framework for Child Welfare in Ontario

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Logic Model of the <strong>Framework</strong> – Us<strong>in</strong>g Steps 5 - 8<strong>An</strong>ti-<strong>Oppression</strong> <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Welfare</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ontario</strong>August 2010The logic model section of the <strong>Framework</strong> (Steps 5-8) <strong>in</strong>volves: revisit the outcomes developed<strong>in</strong> Step 1 (Step 5); identify the necessary resources and supports to achieve outcomes (Step 6);develop <strong>in</strong>dividual, group and <strong>in</strong>stitutional/systemic action strategies (Step 7); and develop<strong>in</strong>dicators which will measure progress towards outcomes (Step 8).Step 5: Revisit Outcomes/Assess Impact on Service UsersTo beg<strong>in</strong> the logic model, it is important to revisit the outcomes developed <strong>in</strong> Step 1 as well as toassess the impact on service users of decisions made dur<strong>in</strong>g the organizational change process(completed Steps 1-4) to ensure that they are still relevant and have a positive impact on serviceusers.Step 6: Shift Institutional Challenges <strong>in</strong>to AO OpportunitiesShift Institutional Challenges <strong>in</strong>to AO Opportunities(This <strong>in</strong>volves identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutional supports that have power to reject (challenges) or adopt (opportunities)changes)This next step <strong>in</strong>volves identify<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>stitutional (organizational) supports that can <strong>in</strong>fluencewhether changes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitution are accepted or rejected.<strong>An</strong> example of <strong>in</strong>stitutional supports may be recogniz<strong>in</strong>g the work of staff who participate <strong>in</strong> AOcommittees and activities through, <strong>for</strong> example, workloads that take this <strong>in</strong>to account.Step 7: Identify Individual, Group and Institutional/Systemic Action StepsIdentify Individual, Group and Institutional Action Steps <strong>in</strong> 6 CategoriesCommunicationLearn<strong>in</strong>g &DevelopmentHR PracticesInvolv<strong>in</strong>g ServiceUsersSupervisionWork<strong>in</strong>g w ithCommunityThis step <strong>in</strong>volves the identification of <strong>in</strong>dividual, group and <strong>in</strong>stitutional/systemic action stepsto achieve the <strong>in</strong>tended outcomes (from Step 1). Action steps require the <strong>in</strong>tegration of an<strong>in</strong>dividual, group and <strong>in</strong>stitutional/systemic response. That is, <strong>for</strong> every <strong>in</strong>dividual action taken,there is a related group and <strong>in</strong>stitutional/systemic response. This <strong>in</strong>tegration promotessusta<strong>in</strong>ability and <strong>in</strong>stitutional support that will result <strong>in</strong> systemic change.24 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!