<strong>An</strong>ti-<strong>Oppression</strong> <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Welfare</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ontario</strong>August 2010SupervisionIndividual Group Institutional/SystemicRole modelconversations withcolleagues to explore andaddress systemic issuesfaced by service usersSupport staff to exploreand address systemicissues (oppression,heterosexism, racism,ablelism, ageism etc.)faced by service usersOpen acknowledgement ofthe systemic barriers facedby service users and f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gways to address thesebarriers is a rout<strong>in</strong>e part ofthe dialogue at the agencySupervisors support staffto use the <strong>for</strong>malcompla<strong>in</strong>ts process whenoppression has occurredInitiate conversationsabout social location,power and value base <strong>in</strong>relation to the impact onservice users, volunteers,colleagues, andmanagersPromote others to beaware and conscious oftheir privilege and sociallocation by role model<strong>in</strong>gPromote the importanceof plac<strong>in</strong>g children <strong>in</strong>culturally and raciallyappropriate foster homesAs a Manager, <strong>in</strong>itiatethe monitor<strong>in</strong>g, andevaluation to ensureanti-oppression on seniormanagement andorganizational-wideagendaInitiate the discussion ofthe roots of oppressionexperienced by childrenand families, andpropose collaborativesolutions to address itDemonstrate pr<strong>in</strong>ciple ofAO as part ofengagement,Implement an agency-wide<strong>for</strong>mal compla<strong>in</strong>ts processLeadership support staff todiscuss social location,power and value base <strong>in</strong>relation to the impact onservice users, volunteers,colleagues, and managersEveryone at the agency isexpected to be aware andconscious of their privilegeand social locationThe agency screens toplace children <strong>in</strong> culturallyand racially appropriatefoster homesAllocate a Lead Manager tomonitor, evaluate, andensure anti-oppression ison senior managementand organizational-wideagendaThe agency has <strong>for</strong>mal and<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal opportunities todiscuss roots of oppressionexperienced by childrenand families and proposecollaborative solutions toaddress itEnsure pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of AO arepart of engagement,assessment, case notes,Feedback from thecompla<strong>in</strong>ts process is usedto improve AO practicewith<strong>in</strong> the agencyDiscussions lead to<strong>in</strong>stitutional changes <strong>in</strong>relation to address<strong>in</strong>gpower differentialsBe<strong>in</strong>g aware and consciousof privilege and sociallocation creates changes <strong>in</strong>program deliveryThe child welfare sectorrecognizes it as a strategicpriority to place children <strong>in</strong>culturally and raciallyappropriate foster homesThe monitor<strong>in</strong>g andevaluation of antioppressionon seniormanagement andorganizational-wide agendaleads to anti-oppressiveoutcomesThe child welfare sectorpromotes <strong>for</strong>mal and<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal opportunities todiscuss roots of oppressionexperienced by children andfamilies and proposecollaborative solutions toaddress itAO pr<strong>in</strong>ciples as part of theengagement, assessment,case notes, service plann<strong>in</strong>g48 | P a g e
<strong>An</strong>ti-<strong>Oppression</strong> <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Welfare</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ontario</strong>August 2010Individual Group Institutional/Systemicassessment, case notes,service plann<strong>in</strong>g andservice deliveryservice plann<strong>in</strong>g, andservice deliveryand service delivery aservice standardAdvocate <strong>for</strong> serviceusers <strong>in</strong> one’s roleThe agency providesrecognition of those whoadvocate <strong>for</strong> service usersThe child welfare sectorrecognizes those whoadvocate <strong>for</strong> service usersWork<strong>in</strong>g with the Community“Giv<strong>in</strong>g up power means be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clusive of all groups, [that is] all of the marg<strong>in</strong>alized groups. [It means]hav<strong>in</strong>g representation from these groups and hav<strong>in</strong>g jo<strong>in</strong>t decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g about policy, procedures andpractices”- Consultation Participant, 2009(In an AO agency) the service and program delivery would come from the community and value what thecommunity has to offer. [The] agencies [would] buy <strong>in</strong>to this no matter what it looked like, and theleadership would support this.- Consultation Participant, 2009Individual Group Institutional/SystemicProvide opportunities andsupport <strong>for</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alizedcommunities to be<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> agency policydevelopmentThe agency developsmethods to <strong>in</strong>volve thecommunity <strong>in</strong> agencypolicy developmentThe community would be<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> agency policydevelopmentIn consultations <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>gthe community, staff shiftsfrom “power over” to“power with” approach(Dumbrill, 2009)It is an expectation of theagency that <strong>in</strong> communityconsultations, agencyrepresentativesdemonstrate a “powerwith” approachAgencies mustdemonstrate how theydemonstrate a “powerwith” approach as aservice standard49 | P a g e