2 Renmark to border LAP area assessment - EPA - Sa.gov.au
2 Renmark to border LAP area assessment - EPA - Sa.gov.au
2 Renmark to border LAP area assessment - EPA - Sa.gov.au
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
River Murray and Lower Lakes catchment risk <strong>assessment</strong> for water quality: Results and management options<br />
The Sustainable Recreation Project (2005) is currently prioritising recreation sites along the River Murray<br />
and Lower Lakes that require rehabilitation and/or additional recreation facilities. This project has<br />
highlighted Ramco Point and Holder Bend as rehabilitation sites with recommendations including<br />
installation of <strong>to</strong>ilets. Hart lagoon has also been recommended for rehabilitation with revegetation and<br />
interpretive signage.<br />
Discharges from creeks (Big Toolunka and Scott) were assessed as a moderate risk, as was Waikerie urban<br />
s<strong>to</strong>rmwater discharge. The actual risk from these sources would likely be lower as people would tend not<br />
<strong>to</strong> swim or ski during or immediately following rainfall events.<br />
Nutrients<br />
Moderate nutrient risks included horticultural <strong>area</strong>s, creeks, Jaeschke lagoon, two marinas, the Waikerie<br />
STEDS lagoons, the Morgan and Blanche<strong>to</strong>wn <strong>to</strong>wnships, Morgan river vessel waste disposal station, and<br />
Blanche<strong>to</strong>wn caravan park. Low nutrient risks <strong>to</strong> recreational values included sources such as the<br />
numerous informal camping <strong>area</strong>s without sanitation facilities, vessel mooring <strong>area</strong>s, s<strong>to</strong>rmwater<br />
discharges and possible effluent discharge from wastewater/STEDS pump failure in regional <strong>to</strong>wnships<br />
and shack <strong>area</strong>s.<br />
Hydrocarbons<br />
One hydrocarbon risk was assessed as moderate, namely for accidental fuel spillage at the Morgan ferry.<br />
The remaining hydrocarbon risks were all assessed as low and included accidental spillage from vessel<br />
mooring <strong>area</strong>s and boat ramps. The actual risk would likely <strong>to</strong> be only <strong>to</strong> aesthetic values, as people<br />
would tend not <strong>to</strong> swim or ski in <strong>area</strong>s that have oil slicks.<br />
Turbidity<br />
The highly turbid nature of the river already poses a risk <strong>to</strong> recreation, as there is generally no visibility<br />
at a depth of 1.2 m (ANZECC 2000). In the current report, most identified sources of increased turbidity<br />
were assessed as low level, apart from a few moderate rankings for creek and urban s<strong>to</strong>rmwater<br />
discharges. Wake-induced erosion, in particular, was highlighted as a common community concern but its<br />
actual impact on recreation was difficult <strong>to</strong> quantify.<br />
107