23.11.2012 Views

2 Renmark to border LAP area assessment - EPA - Sa.gov.au

2 Renmark to border LAP area assessment - EPA - Sa.gov.au

2 Renmark to border LAP area assessment - EPA - Sa.gov.au

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

River Murray and Lower Lakes catchment risk <strong>assessment</strong> for water quality: Results and management options<br />

Risks <strong>to</strong> recreational use<br />

Figure 7.5 is the key map for risks <strong>to</strong> the raw water supply environmental value in the GW & CD <strong>LAP</strong><br />

<strong>area</strong>s. The attached DVD has individual maps numbered according <strong>to</strong> the key map.<br />

Frequencies of identified risks <strong>to</strong> recreational values for the various water quality stressors are<br />

summarised in Table 7.3. The highest frequency of risks was for pathogens followed by hydrocarbons,<br />

turbidity and nutrients. The majority of these risks (149) were assessed as low level although a large<br />

number (103) of moderate-level risks were identified. No high or very high risks were identified.<br />

Table 7.3 Frequency of risks <strong>to</strong> recreational use, GW & CD <strong>LAP</strong> <strong>area</strong>s<br />

PA—pathogens; NU—nutrients; TU—turbidity; HY—hydrocarbons<br />

Table 7.4 lists the recreational risks identified in this <strong>LAP</strong> <strong>area</strong> which are discussed in more detail below<br />

in relation <strong>to</strong> each stressor.<br />

Pathogens<br />

Septic tanks (eg north side of Hindmarsh Island, Mundoo channel, Clay<strong>to</strong>n West, Meningie shacks)<br />

presented a moderate risk through leakage (exacerbated by overloading or other system failures). The<br />

north side of Hindmarsh Island could be a priority for mitigation given that there is high-use recreation in<br />

this <strong>area</strong> and flow/flushing restrictions imposed by the Goolwa barrage. The Milang south shores shacks<br />

are being connected <strong>to</strong> STEDS but this was not fully operational (still some septic tank soakage trench<br />

risks) so a moderate risk was assigned.<br />

Vessel mooring <strong>area</strong>s and marinas were in general assigned a moderate risk ranking due <strong>to</strong> the likelihood<br />

of greywater and blackwater discharges. A cumulative risk may be present from vessels and marinas in<br />

and near Goolwa. The Marina, Hindmarsh Island was given a low risk ranking due <strong>to</strong> presence of a vessel<br />

waste disposal station and no vessels with live-aboard accommodation that discharge waste (there are<br />

only a few live-aboard vessels and the waste from these is pumped <strong>to</strong> the marina treatment plant).<br />

There are much fewer live-aboard vessels/houseboats in the Coorong and Lower Lakes <strong>area</strong> than on the<br />

river but there is a large amount of boating activity (over 1400 boats mainly fishing, sailing and ski,<br />

Helicon Consulting 2003). Many of these types of vessels have only portable <strong>to</strong>ilet systems (higher<br />

potential for illegal discharge) and there are currently insufficient land-based facilities for people <strong>to</strong><br />

empty these <strong>to</strong>ilets. Potential accidental spillage at the Goolwa river vessel waste disposal station<br />

(connected <strong>to</strong> the Goolwa STEDS) was also given a moderate risk and community concern was raised<br />

about its exposed location.<br />

210<br />

Stressor<br />

Risk PA NU TU HY Total<br />

Low 21 41 22 65 149<br />

Moderate 61 7 35 0 103<br />

High 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Very high 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Total 82 48 57 65 252

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!