Chapter 2: National Estimates <strong>of</strong> Delinquency CasesRace■■■In 2005, the total delinquency caserate for black juveniles (108.4) wasmore than double the rate for whitejuveniles (44.4) <strong>and</strong> for AmericanIndian youth (53.3); the delinquencycase rate for Asian youth was 17.2.The delinquency case rate for whitejuveniles peaked in 1997 (54.3) <strong>and</strong>then fell 18% by 2005; for black juveniles,the rate in 2005 was down13% from its 1995 peak (124.1). Thedelinquency case rate for AmericanIndian youth peaked in 1992 (93.9)<strong>and</strong> then declined 43% by 2005; forAsian youth the peak occurred in1995 (20.6) <strong>and</strong> fell 16% by <strong>2005.</strong>Between 1985 <strong>and</strong> 2005, the person<strong>of</strong>fense case rate increased 97% forwhite youth, 81% for black youth,44% for American Indian youth, <strong>and</strong>80% for Asian youth.Between 1997 <strong>and</strong> 2005, delinquency case rates declined for youth<strong>of</strong> all racial groups: 25% for American Indians, 18% for whites, <strong>and</strong>11% for Asians <strong>and</strong> for blacksCases per 1,000 juveniles ages 10–upper age140Delinquency120Black100Amer. Indian806040White20Asian01985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005■In 2005, the person <strong>of</strong>fense caserate for black juveniles (34.0) wasalmost 3 times the rate for AmericanIndian youth (11.8), more than 3times the rate for white juveniles(9.9), <strong>and</strong> 9 times that <strong>of</strong> Asianyouth (3.7).■ Property <strong>of</strong>fense case rates in 2005were lower than in 1985 for eachracial group.Cases per 1,000 juveniles ages 10–upper age35Person30Black2520Amer. Indian1510White5Asian085 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05Cases per 1,000 juveniles ages 10–upper age60504030Amer. IndianPropertyBlack2010WhiteAsian085 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05■The drug <strong>of</strong>fense case rate for blackjuveniles increased dramatically from1985 to 1989, leveled <strong>of</strong>f, <strong>and</strong> thenincreased to reach a peak in 1996(12.5) that was 230% above the ratein 1985 (3.8). Between 1996 <strong>and</strong>2005, the drug <strong>of</strong>fense case rate forblack juveniles declined 28%, whilethe rate increased 11% for whitejuveniles, 28% for American Indianyouth, <strong>and</strong> 18% for Asian youth.Cases per 1,000 juveniles ages 10–upper age14Drugs12Black1086White4Amer. Indian2Asian085 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05Cases per 1,000 juveniles ages 10–upper age35Public order30252015BlackAmer. Indian10White5Asian085 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05■Between 1985 <strong>and</strong> 2005, publicorder <strong>of</strong>fense case rates increased201% for black juveniles (10.4 to31.3), 76% for white juveniles (6.9 to12.2), 41% for American Indian youth(9.9 to 13.9), <strong>and</strong> 123% for Asianyouth (2.0 to 4.5).20<strong>Juvenile</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> 2005
Chapter 2: National Estimates <strong>of</strong> Delinquency CasesRaceCase rates for juveniles generally increased with age for person,drug, <strong>and</strong> public order <strong>of</strong>fenses, regardless <strong>of</strong> raceCases per 1,000 juveniles in age group25020015010050DelinquencyBlackAmer. IndianWhiteAsian010 11 12 13 14 15 16 17AgeCases per 1,000 juveniles in age group70Person60Black50403020Amer. Indian10White0Asian10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17AgeCases per 1,000 juveniles in age group40Drugs3020BlackWhite10Amer. IndianAsian010 11 12 13 14 15 16 17AgeCases per 1,000 juveniles in age group7060Property504030BlackAmer. Indian2010WhiteAsian010 11 12 13 14 15 16 17AgeCases per 1,000 juveniles in age group80Public order60Black40Amer.Indian20White0Asian10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17Age■■■■■■In 2005, the delinquency case ratefor 13-year-olds was more than 8times the rate for 10-year-olds foreach racial group.Age-specific person <strong>of</strong>fense rates forblack juveniles in 2005 averagedmore than 3 times the rates for whitejuveniles <strong>and</strong> American Indian youth.In 2005, the person <strong>of</strong>fense caserate for 16-year-olds was more thantwice the rate for 13-year-olds forwhite juveniles <strong>and</strong> Asian juveniles.With the exception <strong>of</strong> black juveniles,age-specific case rates for property<strong>of</strong>fenses in 2005 were higher thanthe rates for other <strong>of</strong>fensecategories.In 2005, property <strong>of</strong>fense case rateswere higher for black juveniles thanthose for youth <strong>of</strong> all other race categoriesfor each age group.In 2005, racial disparity in age specificdrug <strong>of</strong>fense case ratesincreased after age 13. By age 17,the black drug <strong>of</strong>fense case rate wastwice the white rate, more than twicethe rate <strong>of</strong> American Indian youth,<strong>and</strong> more than 8 times the rate <strong>of</strong>Asian youth.■ Within each age group, the 2005public order <strong>of</strong>fense case rate forblack juveniles was 2 to 3 times therate for white <strong>and</strong> American Indianyouth.<strong>Juvenile</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> 2005 21