Juvenile Court Statistics 2005. - Office of Juvenile Justice and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 3: National Estimates of Delinquency Case ProcessingCase Processing by Selected Individual Offense, 2005Robbery Cases■■■■Juvenile courts waived 47 of every1,000 robbery cases to criminal courtin 2005.In 2005, juvenile courts ordered formalsanctions or waived jurisdictionin 62% of all robbery cases (618 of1,000).In 2005, 24% of robbery casesreceived a formal sanction of out-ofhomeplacement (241 of 1,000) and29% resulted in formal probation(292 of 1,000).Of all robbery cases referred to juvenilecourt in 2005, 12% were notpetitioned; the majority (71%) ofthese cases were dismissed.A typical 1,000 47 Waivedrobbery cases241 Placed570 Adjudicated 292 Probation878 Petitioned 38 Other sanction13 Probation122 Not petitioned 22 Other sanction87 Dismissed20 Probation260 Not adjudicated 46 Other sanction194 DismissedBurglary Cases■■■■■Juvenile courts waived 8 of every1,000 burglary cases to criminal courtin 2005.In 2005, 73% (556 of 761) of all petitionedburglary cases resulted in theyouth being adjudicated delinquent.Juvenile courts ordered formal sanctionsor waived jurisdiction in 74% ofall formally handled burglary cases in2005.In 2005, 150 of 1,000 burglary casesreceived a formal sanction of out-ofhomeplacement and 362 of 1,000resulted in formal probation.Nearly one-quarter (24%) of all burglarycases referred to juvenile courtsin 2005 were handled informally andabout half of these cases (119 of239) were dismissed.A typical 1,000 8 Waivedburglary cases150 Placed556 Adjudicated 362 Probation761 Petitioned 45 Other sanction41 Probation239 Not petitioned 79 Other sanction119 Dismissed13 Probation197 Not adjudicated 54 Other sanction130 DismissedNotes: Cases are categorized by their most severe or restrictive sanction. Detail maynot add to totals because of rounding. Annual case processing flow diagrams for 1985through 2005 are available online at www.ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/ojstatbb/court/faqs.asp.68Juvenile Court Statistics 2005
Chapter 3: National Estimates of Delinquency Case ProcessingCase Processing by Selected Individual Offense, 2005A typical 1,000 6 Waivedmotor vehicle theft cases166 Placed528 Adjudicated 311 Probation764 Petitioned 52 Other sanctionMotor Vehicle Theft Cases■Juvenile courts waived about onehalfof 1% of motor vehicle theftcases to criminal court in 2005 (6 ofevery 1,000).11 Probation230 Not adjudicated 63 Other sanction157 Dismissed33 Probation236 Not petitioned 61 Other sanction141 Dismissed■■■In 2005, 53% of motor vehicle theftcases referred to juvenile courtsresulted in formal court sanctions orwaiver to criminal court.Nearly one-third (31%) of motor vehiclecases adjudicated delinquent in2005 resulted in out-of-home placement(166 of 528).Nearly one-quarter of motor vehicletheft cases referred to juvenile courtsin 2005 were handled without thefiling of a petition (236 of 1,000).A typical 1,000 2 Waivedvandalism cases58 Placed331 Adjudicated 216 Probation524 Petitioned 57 Other sanction103 Probation476 Not petitioned 165 Other sanction208 Dismissed10 Probation191 Not adjudicated 33 Other sanction148 DismissedVandalism Cases■■■Juvenile courts waived 2 of every1,000 vandalism cases to criminalcourt in 2005.More than half of vandalism casesreferred to juvenile courts in 2005were handled formally (524 of 1,000).Of these cases, 63% were adjudicateddelinquent (331 of 524).In 2005, 65% of petitioned vandalismcases adjudicated delinquent resultedin a court sanction of probation (216of 331), and 18% resulted in out-ofhomeplacement (58 of 331).Notes: Cases are categorized by their most severe or restrictive sanction. Detail may notadd to totals because of rounding. Annual case processing flow diagrams for 1985through 2005 are available online at www.ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/ojstatbb/court/faqs.asp.■Juvenile courts handled 476 of every1,000 vandalism cases informally(without a petition) in 2005. Youthreceived informal sanctions in 56% ofthese nonpetitioned cases.Juvenile Court Statistics 2005 69
Page 3 and 4:
Juvenile CourtStatistics 2005Report
Page 10 and 11:
Appendix A: Methods ...............
Page 12 and 13:
PrefaceThe Office of Juvenile Justi
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1: IntroductionIn other com
Page 16 and 17:
Chapter 1: Introductionconsult appe
Page 18 and 19:
Chapter 2: National Estimates of De
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31: Chapter 2: National Estimates of De
Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3National Estimates ofDelin
Page 49: Chapter 3: National Estimates of De
Page 83 and 84: Chapter 4National Estimates ofPetit
Page 85 and 86: Chapter 4: National Estimates of Pe
Page 103: Chapter 4: National Estimates of Pe
Page 106 and 107: Appendix A: MethodsCountof ies Numb
Page 108 and 109: Appendix A: MethodsJuvenile Populat
Page 110 and 111: Appendix A: Methodspotential donor
Page 113 and 114: Appendix BGlossary of TermsAdjudica
Page 115 and 116: Appendix B: Glossary of Terms◆◆
Page 117: Appendix B: Glossary of Termsfrom d
Page 120 and 121: Appendix C: Reported Juvenile Court
Page 130 and 131:
Appendix C: Reported Juvenile Court
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
IndexProbation, 89Trends, 76-78Offe
show all

Juvenile Court Statistics 2005. - Office of Juvenile Justice and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?