Figure 3SALARY DIFFERENTIALS FOR MEN AND WOMEN FROM 1980-81 TO <strong>1999</strong>-<strong>2000</strong>(reporting data for 98 <strong>ARL</strong> university libraries)1980-81 1989-90 <strong>1999</strong>-<strong>2000</strong>Job Category Women Men Female- Women Men Female- Women Mento-Maleto-MaleEamingsEarningsRatioRatioMean Mean Mean Mean Mean MeanDirector $44,872 $48,128 93% $89,598 $88,473 101% $132,068 $125,211Associate Director 34,251 37,001 93% 56,982 59,193 96% 78,230 81,230Assistant Director 28,975 31,776 91 % 50,074 52,869 95% 71,361 75,308Head, Medical 33,941 36,752 92% 64,064 64,792 99% 90,116 101,369Head, Law 36,839 40,248 92% 71,114 81,193 88% 108,777 119,938Head, Branch 22,671 24,946 91% 38,863 43,124 90% 55,689 61,346Functional Specialist 20,218 22,212 91 % 34,588 33,870 102% 45,701 45,907Subject Specialist 21,034 21,820 96% 34,406 37,680 91% 49,038 51,529Head, Acquisitions N/A N/A N/A 37,738 39,311 96% 51,355 53,345Head, Reference 22,956 24,257 95% 39,083 40,663 96% 55,802 55,004Head, Cataloging 23,659 24,315 97% 38,373 42,998 89% 54,079 54,768Head, Serials 21,557 21,768 99% 38,487 37,949 101% 50,625 55,498Head, Documents 21,830 21,293 103% 38,348 36,796 104% 50,005 51,491Head, Circulation 20,942 20,731 101% 33,270 35,385 94% 51,075 45,873Head, Rare books 21,979 27,138 81% 37,881 46,583 81 % 56,653 65,988Head, ComputerSystems N/A N/A N/A 42,488 45,923 93% 61,234 60,185Head, Other 21,725 23,981 91 % 37,626 41,035 92% 52,494 56,575Public services 18,004 18,950 95% 30,803 32,153 96% 41,217 41,988Technical services 18,163 18,668 97% 32,294 33,149 97% 43,536 44,469Administration 20,249 21,148 96% 35,172 35,943 98% 47,353 51,705Reference librarian N/A N/A N/A 31,327 32,030 98% 42,726 43,389Cataloger N/A N/A N/A 31,045 31,882 97% 44,336 43,790TOTAL $20,329 $23,492 87%, $35,694 $39,864 90 ' 1
Graph 2FEMALE-TO-MALE EARNINGS RATIOS110% r---------------------------------------------------,105%Directors;§•...~" ='=...•w100%95%90%85%All PositionsThere is also a sense that the gender gap persists in academe in areas beyond thelibrary and that a renewed commitment to resolve the problem is needed.1° A varietyof reasons have been offered as to why these trends persist, most notably the perceptionthat work is peripheral in a woman's life and, consequently, female-dominatedprofessions are undervalued. Librarianship is predominantly and persistently awoman's profession. The scarcity of men in the profession has been well documentedin many studies - the largest percent of men employed in <strong>ARL</strong> libraries was 38.2 % in1980-81; since then men have consistently represented about 35% of the professionalstaff in <strong>ARL</strong> libraries.INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND SALARIESA. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INSTITUTIONSSalaries in private U.S. <strong>ARL</strong> university libraries continue to exceed those paid inpublicly supported U.S. university libraries. In FY <strong>1999</strong>-<strong>2000</strong>, the differential hasslightly declined, compared to last year, to $2,181, or 4.2%, more for the averageposition in a private institution. In a few cases - Heads of Acquisitions, Serials,Government Documents/Maps, and Circulation, and Reference Librarians with over 1410 Yolanda Moses, "Salaries in Academe: The Gender Gap Persists," ClJronicle of Higher Education (12 December, 1997): A60.18