URA Ordinance vs.Urban Renewal Strategy18The legislation that defines <strong>the</strong> URA’s organizationalmechanism was determined before its guiding principles,<strong>the</strong> Urban Renewal Strategy, was finalized. The Ordinanceitself gives scant mention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Strategy, simply stating that“The Secretary [<strong>of</strong> Planning and Lands] may prepare fromtime to time an urban renewal strategy for <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong>this Part relating to <strong>the</strong> carrying out <strong>of</strong> urban renewal”. 42It makes no reference to <strong>the</strong> Strategy’s content, leaving itentirely open-ended.While a legislative text is not <strong>the</strong> appropriate venue fora lengthy discussion <strong>of</strong> policy aims, one would expectto find in it a description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legal and administrativemechanisms used to accomplish <strong>the</strong> policy goals. However,while <strong>the</strong> Ordinance lists a variety <strong>of</strong> purposes for <strong>the</strong> URA,<strong>the</strong> only mechanisms described within it are those utilizedfor redevelopment.The purposes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> URA stated in <strong>the</strong> Ordinance are:(a) replace <strong>the</strong> LDC as <strong>the</strong> body corporate establishedby statute having <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong> improving <strong>the</strong>standard <strong>of</strong> housing and <strong>the</strong> built environment <strong>of</strong>Hong Kong by undertaking, encouraging, promotingand facilitating urban renewal;(b) improve <strong>the</strong> standard <strong>of</strong> housing and <strong>the</strong> builtenvironment <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong and <strong>the</strong> layout <strong>of</strong> built-upareas by replacing old and dilapidated areas with newdevelopment which is properly planned and, whereappropriate, provided with adequate transport ando<strong>the</strong>r infrastructure and community facilities;(c) achieve better utilization <strong>of</strong> land in <strong>the</strong> dilapidatedareas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> built environment <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong andto make land available to meet various developmentneeds;(d) prevent <strong>the</strong> decay <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> built environment <strong>of</strong> HongKong by promoting <strong>the</strong> maintenance and improvement<strong>of</strong> individual buildings as regards <strong>the</strong>ir structuralstability, integrity <strong>of</strong> external finishes and fire safety aswell as <strong>the</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical appearanceand conditions <strong>of</strong> that built environment;(e) preserve buildings, sites and structures <strong>of</strong> historical,cultural or architectural interest; andThe Ordinance describes <strong>the</strong> URA’s financial arrangementsand powers, <strong>the</strong> procedures required to initiate, implement,and gain planning approval for redevelopment projects,procedures for public objection, and procedures forresuming land. No specific mechanisms are described t<strong>of</strong>ulfil goals (d) and (e) — promoting building maintenanceand preserving historical structures.It can also be noted that all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> purposes stated in<strong>the</strong> Ordinance relate to <strong>the</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> physicalinfrastructure. There is no mention <strong>of</strong> social or environmentalconditions, for example. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> clause abou<strong>the</strong>ritage preservation was not present in <strong>the</strong> original version<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bill, but was inserted at <strong>the</strong> suggestion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LegCosubcommittee in charge <strong>of</strong> studying <strong>the</strong> bill. 43This redevelopment-centred mechanism lies in sharpcontrast to <strong>the</strong> Urban Renewal Strategy, which tries tospell out more holistic goals. The Strategy states thaturban renewal is not a “slash and burn process”, and thata “comprehensive and holistic approach should be adoptedto rejuvenate older urban areas by way <strong>of</strong> redevelopment,rehabilitation and heritage preservation.” 44 It states thatits urban renewal approach should be “people centred”,and that <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> urban renewal is to “improve <strong>the</strong>quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> residents in <strong>the</strong> urban area” and “reduce <strong>the</strong>number <strong>of</strong> inadequately housed people”. 45(f) engage in such o<strong>the</strong>r activities, and to performsuch o<strong>the</strong>r duties, as <strong>the</strong> Chief Executive may, afterconsultation with <strong>the</strong> Authority, permit or assign to itby order published in <strong>the</strong> Gazette.
Paragraph 5 goes on to lay out a number <strong>of</strong> objectivesspecifically related to urban design, environmentalimprovement, and social sustainability. These objectives arequoted below:1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.restructuring and replanning designated target areasdesigning more effective and environmentally-friendlylocal transport and road networksrationalising land usesredeveloping dilapidated buildings into new buildings<strong>of</strong> modern standard and environmentally-friendlydesignpromoting sustainable development in <strong>the</strong> urban areapromoting <strong>the</strong> rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> buildings in need <strong>of</strong>repairpreserving buildings, sites, and structures <strong>of</strong> historical,cultural or architectural interestpreserving as far as practicable local characteristicspreserving <strong>the</strong> social networks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local community10. providing purpose-built housing for groups withspecial needs, such as <strong>the</strong> elderly and <strong>the</strong> disabled11. providing more open space and community/welfarefacilities12. enhancing <strong>the</strong> townscape with attractive landscapeand urban designThese objectives form <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> URA’s “4Rs” motto— Redevelopment, Rehabilitation, pReservation andRevitalization. Given <strong>the</strong> redevelopment-centred structure<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> URA laid out by <strong>the</strong> Ordinance, it is questionablewhe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Authority is equipped to carry out <strong>the</strong>se goals.A look at <strong>the</strong> practical targets set out in <strong>the</strong> Strategy revealsthat <strong>the</strong> holistic language is an afterthought tacked onto a heavy programme <strong>of</strong> redevelopment. The Strategy,released in 2001, aimed to redevelop 2,000 old buildingsin about 200 sites over <strong>the</strong> following 20 years, improve <strong>the</strong>environmental quality <strong>of</strong> 67 hectares in old urban areas,rehouse 27,000 tenant households, provide 60,000 m 2<strong>of</strong> open space, 90,000 m 2 <strong>of</strong> floor space for government,institution or community (GIC) facilities, and buildseven new schools. These 200 redevelopment sites werepre-selected by <strong>the</strong> government and were named in anundisclosed Annex to <strong>the</strong> Strategy. .If <strong>the</strong>se targets are to be met, it would necessitate anaverage <strong>of</strong> 10 redevelopment projects affecting an average<strong>of</strong> 100 buildings and 1,350 tenant households every year.The Strategy does not acknowledge <strong>the</strong> contradictionbetween this rapid pace <strong>of</strong> redevelopment and goals such as“preserving <strong>the</strong> social networks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local community” or“preserving as far as practicable local characteristics”.Redevelopment is <strong>the</strong> engine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> URA. It is a machinedesigned to conduct 200 redevelopment projects identifiedby <strong>the</strong> government with <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> mandatory resumptionand land premium waivers.Money made from redevelopment is meant to fund <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rthree Rs <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation, preservation, and revitalisation.However as we shall see in Part II, <strong>the</strong> both <strong>the</strong> financialresources and number <strong>of</strong> projects it has devoted to <strong>the</strong>seactivities are a small fraction <strong>of</strong> its overall portfolio.19
- Page 7: The Local Context:Evolving Communit
- Page 10 and 11: Hong Kong Urban Design ConcernsHong
- Page 12 and 13: 12In 1998, the Planning Department
- Page 14 and 15: Part I:14The URA —A Redevelopment
- Page 16 and 17: Version 2:The Urban RenewalAuthorit
- Page 20 and 21: How The URA WorksThe Cycle ofResump
- Page 22 and 23: PART II:22The PoliticalEconomyof th
- Page 24 and 25: The Institutional ContextNationaliz
- Page 26 and 27: 26traditionally given the Lands Dep
- Page 28 and 29: 28maximum allowable plot ratio —
- Page 31 and 32: Left: Multi-ownership with inadequa
- Page 33 and 34: Weak building maintenanceregulation
- Page 35 and 36: Lack of FinancingOne significant pr
- Page 37 and 38: Left: Graham Streetrequirement. 137
- Page 39 and 40: Left: Graham Streetthe 1970s to ind
- Page 41 and 42: From the point of view of private d
- Page 43 and 44: The Built EnvironmentPart I discuss
- Page 45 and 46: Left: The K11 shopping mall, hotel,
- Page 48 and 49: Box 4Calculating Plot RatioPlot rat
- Page 50 and 51: 50Standardized ArchitectureStandard
- Page 53 and 54: Left: Langham Place, blank facade o
- Page 56 and 57: 56Figure-ground diagram of Langham
- Page 58 and 59: 58This page: Footbridge network ove
- Page 61: Left: Wo Tik Street - the only acti
- Page 65 and 66: Public Open Spaces and Pedestrian P
- Page 67 and 68: The MertonThe Merton in Kennedy Tow
- Page 69 and 70:
Left: The widened pavement along Sh
- Page 71 and 72:
Langham PlaceThere are often paveme
- Page 73 and 74:
Recreational Public Open SpacesQuan
- Page 75:
Hanoi Road K11 Open SpaceSize: 1,20
- Page 78 and 79:
78Clockwise from left: The ground f
- Page 81 and 82:
The MertonTotal size (sites A and B
- Page 83 and 84:
General ObservationsLandscapingGene
- Page 85:
The URA also announced that it had
- Page 88 and 89:
Box 6The Counterproductive Pursuito
- Page 91 and 92:
Opposite, clockwise from top right:
- Page 93 and 94:
Social ImpactSocially sustainable d
- Page 96 and 97:
Left: Western Market has become pri
- Page 98 and 99:
98This spread from left: This anony
- Page 100 and 101:
Top: A naturally gentrified street
- Page 102 and 103:
102Comprehensive redevelopment disp
- Page 104 and 105:
104Luxury shopping at the K11 mall
- Page 106 and 107:
106A building rehabilitated by the
- Page 108 and 109:
According to town planner Ian Brown
- Page 110 and 111:
110
- Page 112 and 113:
112Wan Chai Market. Built in 1937,
- Page 114 and 115:
114
- Page 116 and 117:
116
- Page 118 and 119:
118Conclusion
- Page 120 and 121:
120
- Page 122 and 123:
Appendix 1Name of projectAddress/lo
- Page 124 and 125:
Name of projectAddress/locationArea
- Page 126 and 127:
126Endnotes1 HKSAR Planning Departm
- Page 128 and 129:
128110 Chan, B. W. (2002), “The h
- Page 130:
Room 701, Hoseinee House,69 Wyndham