130McKayBrundtl<strong>and</strong> Report. 1987. Our Common Future,Report <strong>of</strong> the UN World Commission onEnvironment <strong>and</strong> Development. Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford.Clark, S.D. <strong>and</strong> I.A. Renard. 1970. The ripari<strong>and</strong>octrine <strong>and</strong> Australian Legislation. 7 MelbourneUniversity Law Review 475.Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Forestry,2002/3. National Government. Available at:http://www.daffa.gov.au/about/annualreport/02-03/appendices/app6.Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Forestry.2006a. National Government. Available at:http://www.daffa.gov.au/natural-resources/water/reform/resources.Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Forestry.2006b. General Government Sector budgetstatements. Available at: http://www.daffa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/5680/outcomes.pdf.Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Forestry,Murray Darling Basin Commission 2006 Murray-Darling Basin. Available at: www.daffa.gov.au/mdbc.Evans, R. 2001 Managing Over-AllocatedGroundwater Systems, Paper presented at the 3rdAustralasian Natural Resources Law <strong>and</strong> PolicyConference, Adelaide p 194. A copy <strong>of</strong> the paperwas obtained directly from Sinclair Knight Merz.Government <strong>of</strong> South Australia <strong>and</strong> Eyre PeninsulaLocal Government Association. 2006. EyrePeninsula Coastal Development Strategy.Hallows, P. <strong>and</strong> D. Thompson. 1999. The History<strong>of</strong> Irrigation in Australia. Australian NationalCommittee on Irrigation <strong>and</strong> Drainage, Canberra.Harris, S <strong>and</strong> D. Throsby. 1997. The ESD Process:Background, implementation <strong>and</strong> aftermath. InHamilton, C. <strong>and</strong> D. Throsby (eds.) The ESDProcess: Evaluating a Policy Experiment, p 1-21, Academy <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences <strong>and</strong> GraduateProgram in Public Policy Australian NationalUniversity Workshop, ANU, Published by theAcademy <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences in Australia <strong>and</strong>Graduate Program in public Policy, ANU.Jones, G., J. Whittington, J. McKay, A. Arthington,I. Lawrence, S. Cartwright, <strong>and</strong> P. Cullen. 2001.Independent Assessment <strong>of</strong> Jurisdictional Reportson the Achievements <strong>of</strong> the COAG <strong>Water</strong> Reforms2001, Cooperative <strong>Research</strong> Centre for FreshwaterEcology, funded by NHT, Environment Australia<strong>and</strong> National Competition Council, Canberra.Langdon, M. 2002. Briefi ng Papers: Indigenousrights to waters, ATSIC.McKay, J. M. 1994. <strong>Water</strong> planning in SA.Australasian <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources Law<strong>and</strong> Policy, 1(2) 595–609.McKay, J. M. 2002a. Encountering the South AustralianL<strong>and</strong>scape: Early European misconceptions <strong>and</strong> ourpresent water problems. Hawke Institute Workingpaper series paper 21. www.hawkecentre.unisa.edu.au/institute.McKay, J. M. 2002b. Legal issues in water planningregimes: Lessons for Australia, in Brennan, D.(ed.), <strong>Water</strong> Policy Reform: Lessons from Asia<strong>and</strong> Australia. Australian Centre for InternationalAgricultural <strong>Research</strong>, proceeding 106, pp 48–62Canberra. ACIAR.McKay, J. M. 2003. Marketisation in Australianfreshwater <strong>and</strong> fisheries management regimes. InDovers S <strong>and</strong> Sue Wild River (eds.), ManagingAustralia’s Environment. Ann<strong>and</strong>ale FederationPress, pp. 363–390.McKay, J. M. And A. Hurlimann. 2003. Attitudesto reclaimed water for domestic use; Age Part 1,<strong>Water</strong>, 28(5) 45–50.McKay J. M. 2005. <strong>Water</strong> Institutional reforms inAustralia. In Special issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Policy <strong>Water</strong>Institutional reform: Theory <strong>and</strong> practice, p 35-53.McKay, J. M. 2006. The legal framework <strong>of</strong>Australian water. In Crase L (Ed.) <strong>Water</strong> Resourcesin Australia, <strong>Issue</strong>s in <strong>Water</strong> Policies Series, serieseditor A. Dinar, Resources for the Future, www.RFFPress.org/water.Murray Darling Basin Commission. Available at:www.mdbc.gov.au.Mutton, D. pers comm. Presiding member <strong>of</strong> theNRM Council SA.National <strong>Water</strong> Initiative web site www.nwc.gov.au.North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change <strong>and</strong>Economic Performance. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, MA.Powell, J. 1999. Victoria, in Broughton, W. (ed.),A Century <strong>of</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Resources Development. InAustralia, The Institution <strong>of</strong> Engineers Australia,Sydney.Rickson, S. 2006. Linking the social with theenvironmental: Identifying community capacityin the South East Queensl<strong>and</strong> Western CatchmentsGroup, In Whelan J. ( Ed.) Partnership BasedSocial <strong>Research</strong> for Sustainable Natural ResourceUCOWRJOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATION
Implementation <strong>of</strong> Australian <strong>Water</strong> Laws131Management in Queensl<strong>and</strong>. National Action Planfor Salinity <strong>and</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Quality.Saleth, R. M. <strong>and</strong> A. Dinar. 2004. The InstitutionalEconomics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Water</strong>: A cross-country analysis <strong>of</strong>institutions <strong>and</strong> performance. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing Pvt.Sharachch<strong>and</strong>ra. 1991. Sustainable Development: Acritical Review. World Development 19 (6): 607-621.Shi, T. 2005. Simplifying complex water entitlements.<strong>Water</strong> 32 (5): 39-43.Sinclair, P. 2001. The Murray: A River <strong>and</strong> Its People.Melbourne University Press.JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATIONUCOWR
- Page 3:
Journal of ContemporaryWater Resear
- Page 6 and 7:
2Bruce Hooperinstitutional, and tem
- Page 11 and 12:
IWRM: Governance, Best Practice, an
- Page 13 and 14:
IWRM: Defi nitions and Conceptual M
- Page 15 and 16:
IWRM: Defi nitions and Conceptual M
- Page 17 and 18:
IWRM: Defi nitions and Conceptual M
- Page 19:
IWRM: Defi nitions and Conceptual M
- Page 22 and 23:
18Cardwell. Cole, Cartwright, and M
- Page 24 and 25:
20Mostert26 water boards responsibl
- Page 26 and 27:
22MostertTable 1. Third National Wa
- Page 28 and 29:
24MostertImplementationThe ambitiou
- Page 30 and 31:
26MostertBiswas, A. K. 2004b. Respo
- Page 32 and 33:
28UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 34 and 35:
30Ashton, Turton, and Rouxresource
- Page 36 and 37:
32Ashton, Turton, and Rouxassumptio
- Page 38 and 39:
34Ashton, Turton, and RouxEffective
- Page 40 and 41:
36UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 42 and 43:
38Hussey and Doversin water policy
- Page 44 and 45:
40Hussey and Dovers1994 Council of
- Page 46 and 47:
42Hussey and Doversestablished Thes
- Page 48 and 49:
44Hussey and DoversTable 1. Typolog
- Page 50 and 51:
46Hussey and Doversassessment appro
- Page 52 and 53:
48Hussey and Doverspolicy goals.Bey
- Page 54 and 55:
50Hussey and DoversFrawley, K. 1994
- Page 56 and 57:
52Mitchelloften took three to four
- Page 58 and 59:
54Mitchelltree preservation plans;
- Page 60 and 61:
56UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 62 and 63:
58Genskow and Borna series of chall
- Page 64 and 65:
60Genskow and BornTable 1. Watershe
- Page 66 and 67:
62Genskow and Bornthe first Dungene
- Page 68 and 69:
64Genskow and BornWashington, DC.Ko
- Page 70 and 71:
66Green and Fernández-BilbaoWithin
- Page 72 and 73:
68Green and Fernández-Bilbaosubjec
- Page 74 and 75:
70Green and Fernández-Bilbaoinflue
- Page 76 and 77:
72Green and Fernández-BilbaoBerbel
- Page 78 and 79:
74UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 80 and 81:
76BallweberEstablish AdvisoryCommit
- Page 82 and 83:
78Ballweberattributes in others (Ch
- Page 84 and 85: 80UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 86 and 87: 82Barreiraand ground water. To this
- Page 88 and 89: 84Barreirawith other states for int
- Page 90 and 91: 86UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 92 and 93: 88Davis and ThrelfallResource Manag
- Page 94 and 95: 90Davis and ThrelfallTable 2. Thirt
- Page 96 and 97: 92Davis and Threlfallby regional an
- Page 98 and 99: 94Davis and Threlfallenforcement, a
- Page 100 and 101: 96Davis and Threlfallhusbandry prac
- Page 102 and 103: 98Davis and ThrelfallNew Zealand: T
- Page 104 and 105: 100UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RE
- Page 106 and 107: 102Lamoree and van SteenbergenIt is
- Page 108 and 109: 104Lamoree and van Steenbergenand n
- Page 110 and 111: 106Lamoree and van Steenbergeninter
- Page 112 and 113: 108BourgetWorks Planner Capability
- Page 114 and 115: 110Bourgetwith over 600 people resp
- Page 116 and 117: 112Bourgetgovernment’s intrusion
- Page 118 and 119: 114Bourget4.management, drought man
- Page 120 and 121: 116McKayFigure 1. The four paradigm
- Page 122 and 123: 118McKay4. Paradigm 4 (which commen
- Page 124 and 125: 120McKaythree main functions:1. ass
- Page 126 and 127: 122McKayState Implementation of the
- Page 128 and 129: 124McKayTable 2. Corporate governan
- Page 130 and 131: 126McKayFigure 4. Qu. 26 - The ESD
- Page 132 and 133: 128McKayFigure 7. Qu.93- This organ
- Page 136 and 137: 132UCOWR BOARD OF DIRECTORS/COMMITT
- Page 138 and 139: 134BENEFITS OF UCOWR MEMBERSHIPThe
- Page 140 and 141: 136Past Issues of the Journal of Co
- Page 142 and 143: 138Academic Organizations Membershi
- Page 144 and 145: 140Individual Membership Applicatio
- Page 146 and 147: Universities Council on Water Resou
- Page 148: Integrated Water Resources Manageme
Change language