26MostertBiswas, A. K. 2004b. Response to Commentsby Mitchell, Lamoree, <strong>and</strong> Dukhovny. <strong>Water</strong>International 29: 398-405.Blumenthal, K. P. 1989. Hoe beleidsanalyse inNederl<strong>and</strong> kwam. In Beleidsanalyse voor hetNederl<strong>and</strong>se waterbeheer; uitgave ter gelegenheidvan het afscheid van K.P.Blumenthal, 3-36. BureauSAMWAT, ‘s-Gravenhage.Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language <strong>and</strong> symbolic power.Polity, Cambridge.Brugge, R. v. d., J. Rotmans, <strong>and</strong> D. Loorbach. 2005.The transition in Dutch water management. RegionalEnvironmental Change 5:164-176.Bruijn, H. d., E. ten Heuvelh<strong>of</strong>, <strong>and</strong> R. in ‘t Veld. 2002.Process management; Why project managementfails in complex decision making processes. KluwerAcademic, Dordrecht.Brussaard, W., M. v. d. Velde, <strong>and</strong> C. J. v. As. 1995. Eenbrede kijk op waterbeheer: een juridisch-bestuurlijkeevaluatie van het instrumentarium van de Wet op dewaterhuishouding. Projectteam NW4, Den Haag.CHO TNO. 1976. Systeembenadering voor hetwaterbeheer. Central Organization for AppliedScientific <strong>Research</strong> in The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, Den Haag.Commissie Bestudering <strong>Water</strong>huishouding Gelderl<strong>and</strong>.1975. Modelonderzoek 1971 - 1974 ten behoevevan de waterhuishouding in Gelderl<strong>and</strong>; deel 1:Onderzoek in relatie tot beleidsvoorbereiding.Commissie Bestudering <strong>Water</strong>huishouding Gelderl<strong>and</strong>.1980. Een systeembenadering voor de waterhuishoudingvan Gelderl<strong>and</strong>; eindrapport;. z. uitg., Arnhem.Dieperink, C. 1997. Tussen zout en zalm lessen uit deontwikkeling van het regime inzake de Rijnvervuiling.Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam.Dieperink, C. 1999. From open sewer to salmon run:Lessons from the Rhine water quality regime. <strong>Water</strong>Policy 471-485.Disco, C. 2002. Remaking “nature”: The ecological turnin Dutch water management. Science, Technology &Human Values 27:206-235.Dublin Statement. 1992. The Dublin Statement <strong>and</strong>Report <strong>of</strong> the Conference. International Conferenceon <strong>Water</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Environment: Development issuesfor the 21st century, 26-31 January 1992, Dublin,Irel<strong>and</strong>.Glasbergen, P. 1992. Comprehensive policy planningfor water systems. International <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Water</strong>Resources Development 8:45-52.Glasbergen, P., J. Wessel, J. H. P. Baltissen, C. J.Compaijen, M. C. Groenenberg, <strong>and</strong> C. B. F. Kuijpers.1988. Samenhang en samenspel in het waterbeheer;het streven naar integraal waterbeheer het strevennaar integraal waterbeheer. DUP, Delft.Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating : Finding common groundfor multiparty problems, 1st edition. Jossey-Bass,San Francisco.Global <strong>Water</strong> Partnership. 2000. Integrated <strong>Water</strong>Resources Management. Global <strong>Water</strong> Partnership.Global <strong>Water</strong> Partnership. 2005. Toolbox Integrated<strong>Water</strong> Resources Management. Global <strong>Water</strong>Partnership.Heer, J. d., S. Nijwening, S. D. Vuyst, M. v. Rijswick, T.Smit, <strong>and</strong> J. Groenendijk. 2004. Towards Integrated<strong>Water</strong> Legislation in The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s; Lessons fromother countries. Twijnstra Gudde/ Royal Haskoning.Huisman, P. (ed.). 2004. <strong>Water</strong> in the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s:managing checks <strong>and</strong> balances. Netherl<strong>and</strong>sHydrological Society, Netherl<strong>and</strong>s HydrologicalSociety (NHV).Jeffrey, P., <strong>and</strong> M. Gearey. 2006. Integrated waterresources management: Lost on the road fromambition to realisation? <strong>Water</strong> Science & Technology53: 1-8.Kaika, M. 2003. The <strong>Water</strong> Framework Directive: ANew Directive for a Changing Social Political <strong>and</strong>Economic European Framework. European PlanningStudies 11.Kaika, M., <strong>and</strong> B. Page. 2003. The EU <strong>Water</strong> FrameworkDirective: Part 1. European Policy-making <strong>and</strong>the changing topography <strong>of</strong> lobbying. EuropeanEnvironment 13: 314-327.Kallis, G., <strong>and</strong> D. Butler. 2001. The EU water frameworkdirective: measures <strong>and</strong> implications. <strong>Water</strong> Policy3: 125-142.Klijn, E.-H., <strong>and</strong> J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2000. Publicmanagement <strong>and</strong> policy networks; Foundations <strong>of</strong> anetwork approach to governance. Public Management2: 135-158.Klijn, E.-H., <strong>and</strong> J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2006. Institutionaldesign; Changing institutional features <strong>of</strong> networks.Public Management Review 8:141-160.Können, G. P. 2001. Climate Scenarios for ImpactStudies in The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. Royal Netherl<strong>and</strong>sMeteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt.Kuijpers, C. B. F., <strong>and</strong> P. Glasbergen. 1990. Perspectievenvoor integraal waterbeheer; een bestuurskundigeanalyse ten behoeve van de uitwerking van integraalwaterbeheer. SDU Uitgeverij, ‘s-Gravenhage.Lorenz, C. M. 1999. Indicators for sustainableUCOWRJOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATION
IWRM in the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s27management <strong>of</strong> rivers. PhD thesis. Vrije Universiteit,Amsterdam.Meijerink, S. V. 1999. Confl ict <strong>and</strong> cooperation on theScheldt river basin a case study <strong>of</strong> decision makingon international Scheldt issues between 1967 <strong>and</strong>1997. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Ministerie van Verkeer en <strong>Water</strong>staat. 1985. Living withwater: Towards an integral water policy.Ministerie van Verkeer en <strong>Water</strong>staat. 1989. Derde notawaterhuishouding; water voor nu en later. SDUUitgeverij, ‘s-Gravenhage.Ministerie van Verkeer en <strong>Water</strong>staat. 1990. Derdenota waterhuishouding; water voor nu enlater; regeringsbeslissing. SDU Uitgeverij, ‘s-Gravenhage.Ministerie van Verkeer en <strong>Water</strong>staat. 1996. Toekomstvoor <strong>Water</strong>; nota watersysteemverkenningen.Ministerie van Verkeer en <strong>Water</strong>staat, Den Haag.Ministerie van Verkeer en <strong>Water</strong>staat. 1998. Vierde nota<strong>Water</strong>huishouding Regeringsbeslissing. Ministerievan Verkeer en <strong>Water</strong>staat, Den Haag.Ministerie van Verkeer en <strong>Water</strong>staat. 2005. <strong>Water</strong>in Beeld 2005; Voortgangsrapportage over hetwaterbeheer in Nederl<strong>and</strong>. Ministerie van Verkeeren <strong>Water</strong>staat, Den Haag.Mitchell, B. 1990. Integrated water management;international experiences <strong>and</strong> perspectives. BelhavenPress, London.Mitchell, B. 2005. Integrated water resourcesmanagement, institutional arrangements, <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>useplanning. Environment <strong>and</strong> Planning 37: 1335-1352.Mostert, E., M. Craps, <strong>and</strong> C. Pahl-Wostl. in press.Social Learning: the key to integrated water resourcesmanagement? <strong>Water</strong> International.Nas, M., P. Dekker, <strong>and</strong> C. Hemmers. 1997.Maatschappelijke organisaties, publieke opinie enmilieu. VUGA, Den Haag.Nollkaemper, P. A. 1993. The legal regime fortransboundary water pollution: between discretion<strong>and</strong> constraint. Nijh<strong>of</strong>f/ Graham & Trotman,Dordrecht/ London.Pahl-Wostl, C., M. Craps, A. Dewulf, E. Mostert, D.Tabara, <strong>and</strong> T. Taillieu. in press. Social learning <strong>and</strong>water resources management. Ecology <strong>and</strong> Society.Ridder, D., E. Mostert, <strong>and</strong> H. A. Wolters (eds.). 2005.Learning Together To Manage Together; ImprovingParticipation in <strong>Water</strong> Management. University <strong>of</strong>Osnabrueck, USF, Osnabrueck.Rijkswaterstaat. 1987. Integraal waterbeheer; st<strong>and</strong>van zaken december 1986. Rijkswaterstaat DienstBinnenwateren/ RIZA, Lelystad.Rijkswaterstaat, <strong>and</strong> R<strong>and</strong> Corporation. 1978. PolicyAnalysis for the <strong>Water</strong> Management <strong>of</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s(Pawn): A Progress Report. Santa Monica.Roijackers, R. M. M., P. J. T. Verstraelen, <strong>and</strong> L. v. Liere,editors. 1992. Integraal (water)beheer in de praktijkgebracht. Commissie voor Hydrologisch OnderzoekTNO, Delft.Rooy, P. T. C. J. v., <strong>and</strong> J. d. Jong. 1995. Towardscomprehensive water management in The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s(1): Developments. European <strong>Water</strong> Pollution Control5:59-65.Rooy, P. T. C. J. v. 1995. Towards comprehensive watermanagement in The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s (2): Bottlenecks.European <strong>Water</strong> Pollution Control 5:33-40.Silva, W., J. P. M. Dijkman, <strong>and</strong> D. P. Loucks. 2004.Flood management options for The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s.International <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> River Basin Management2:101-112.Slobbe, E. v. 2002. <strong>Water</strong>beheer tussen crisis envernieuwing; Een studie naar vernieuwingsprocessenin de sturing van regionaal waterbeheer. Ph.D. thesis.Wageningen University, Wageningen.Timmermans, J. 2004. Purposive Interaction in Multi-Actor Decision Making: Operationalizing Coleman’sLinear System <strong>of</strong> Action for Policy Decision Support.EBURON, Delft.Veeren, R. J. H. M. v. d. 2002. Economic analyses <strong>of</strong>nutrient abatement policies in the Rhine basin. Ph.D.thesis. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Ven, G. P. v. d., Ed. 2004. Man-made lowl<strong>and</strong>s history<strong>of</strong> water management <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> reclamation in theNetherl<strong>and</strong>s, 4th edition. Matrijs, Utrecht.Verlaan, P. A. J. 1998. Mixing <strong>of</strong> marine <strong>and</strong> fl uvialparticles in the Scheldt estuary. S.n, S.l.Wisserh<strong>of</strong>, J. 1994. Matching research <strong>and</strong> policy inintegrated water management. DUP, Delft.JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATIONUCOWR
- Page 3: Journal of ContemporaryWater Resear
- Page 6 and 7: 2Bruce Hooperinstitutional, and tem
- Page 11 and 12: IWRM: Governance, Best Practice, an
- Page 13 and 14: IWRM: Defi nitions and Conceptual M
- Page 15 and 16: IWRM: Defi nitions and Conceptual M
- Page 17 and 18: IWRM: Defi nitions and Conceptual M
- Page 19: IWRM: Defi nitions and Conceptual M
- Page 22 and 23: 18Cardwell. Cole, Cartwright, and M
- Page 24 and 25: 20Mostert26 water boards responsibl
- Page 26 and 27: 22MostertTable 1. Third National Wa
- Page 28 and 29: 24MostertImplementationThe ambitiou
- Page 32 and 33: 28UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 34 and 35: 30Ashton, Turton, and Rouxresource
- Page 36 and 37: 32Ashton, Turton, and Rouxassumptio
- Page 38 and 39: 34Ashton, Turton, and RouxEffective
- Page 40 and 41: 36UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 42 and 43: 38Hussey and Doversin water policy
- Page 44 and 45: 40Hussey and Dovers1994 Council of
- Page 46 and 47: 42Hussey and Doversestablished Thes
- Page 48 and 49: 44Hussey and DoversTable 1. Typolog
- Page 50 and 51: 46Hussey and Doversassessment appro
- Page 52 and 53: 48Hussey and Doverspolicy goals.Bey
- Page 54 and 55: 50Hussey and DoversFrawley, K. 1994
- Page 56 and 57: 52Mitchelloften took three to four
- Page 58 and 59: 54Mitchelltree preservation plans;
- Page 60 and 61: 56UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 62 and 63: 58Genskow and Borna series of chall
- Page 64 and 65: 60Genskow and BornTable 1. Watershe
- Page 66 and 67: 62Genskow and Bornthe first Dungene
- Page 68 and 69: 64Genskow and BornWashington, DC.Ko
- Page 70 and 71: 66Green and Fernández-BilbaoWithin
- Page 72 and 73: 68Green and Fernández-Bilbaosubjec
- Page 74 and 75: 70Green and Fernández-Bilbaoinflue
- Page 76 and 77: 72Green and Fernández-BilbaoBerbel
- Page 78 and 79: 74UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 80 and 81:
76BallweberEstablish AdvisoryCommit
- Page 82 and 83:
78Ballweberattributes in others (Ch
- Page 84 and 85:
80UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 86 and 87:
82Barreiraand ground water. To this
- Page 88 and 89:
84Barreirawith other states for int
- Page 90 and 91:
86UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RES
- Page 92 and 93:
88Davis and ThrelfallResource Manag
- Page 94 and 95:
90Davis and ThrelfallTable 2. Thirt
- Page 96 and 97:
92Davis and Threlfallby regional an
- Page 98 and 99:
94Davis and Threlfallenforcement, a
- Page 100 and 101:
96Davis and Threlfallhusbandry prac
- Page 102 and 103:
98Davis and ThrelfallNew Zealand: T
- Page 104 and 105:
100UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RE
- Page 106 and 107:
102Lamoree and van SteenbergenIt is
- Page 108 and 109:
104Lamoree and van Steenbergenand n
- Page 110 and 111:
106Lamoree and van Steenbergeninter
- Page 112 and 113:
108BourgetWorks Planner Capability
- Page 114 and 115:
110Bourgetwith over 600 people resp
- Page 116 and 117:
112Bourgetgovernment’s intrusion
- Page 118 and 119:
114Bourget4.management, drought man
- Page 120 and 121:
116McKayFigure 1. The four paradigm
- Page 122 and 123:
118McKay4. Paradigm 4 (which commen
- Page 124 and 125:
120McKaythree main functions:1. ass
- Page 126 and 127:
122McKayState Implementation of the
- Page 128 and 129:
124McKayTable 2. Corporate governan
- Page 130 and 131:
126McKayFigure 4. Qu. 26 - The ESD
- Page 132 and 133:
128McKayFigure 7. Qu.93- This organ
- Page 134 and 135:
130McKayBrundtland Report. 1987. Ou
- Page 136 and 137:
132UCOWR BOARD OF DIRECTORS/COMMITT
- Page 138 and 139:
134BENEFITS OF UCOWR MEMBERSHIPThe
- Page 140 and 141:
136Past Issues of the Journal of Co
- Page 142 and 143:
138Academic Organizations Membershi
- Page 144 and 145:
140Individual Membership Applicatio
- Page 146 and 147:
Universities Council on Water Resou
- Page 148:
Integrated Water Resources Manageme
Change language