Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Roebroeck Seth Valdes-SosaM. Havlicek, J. Jan, M. Brazdil, and V. D. Calhoun. Dynamic granger causality basedon kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fmri data. Neuroimage,53(1):65–77, 2010.R. M. Heidemann, N. Seiberlich, M. A. Griswold, K. Wohlfarth, G. Krueger, and P. M.Jakob. Perspectives and limitations of parallel mr imaging at high field strengths.Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 16(2):311–20, 2006.R. N. Henson, C. J. Price, M. D. Rugg, R. Turner, and K. J. Friston. Detecting latencydifferences in event-related bold responses: application to words versus nonwordsand initial versus repeated face presentations. Neuroimage, 15(1):83–97, 2002.J. L. Hernandez, P. A. Valdés, and P. Vila. Eeg spike and wave modelled by a stochasticlimit cycle. NeuroReport, 1996.B. Horwitz, K. J. Friston, and J. G. Taylor. Neural modeling and functional brainimaging: an overview. Neural Netw, 13(8-9):829–46, 2000.H. Johansen-Berg and T.E.J Behrens, editors. Diffusion MRI: From quantitative measurementto in-vivo neuroanatomy. Academic Press, London, 2009.D.K. Jones, editor. Diffusion MRI: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford, 2010.S. J. Kiebel, M. I. Garrido, R. Moran, C. C. Chen, and K. J. Friston. Dynamic causalmodeling for eeg and meg. Hum Brain Mapp, 30(6):1866–76, 2009.C. H. Liao, K. J. Worsley, J. B. Poline, J. A. Aston, G. H. Duncan, and A. C. Evans.Estimating the delay of the fmri response. Neuroimage, 16(3 Pt 1):593–606, 2002.L. Ljung. System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2ndedition, 1999.N. K. Logothetis. What we can do and what we cannot do with fmri. Nature, 453(7197):869–78, 2008.N. K. Logothetis, J. Pauls, M. Augath, T. Trinath, and A. Oeltermann. Neurophysiologicalinvestigation of the basis of the fmri signal. Nature, 412(6843):150–7, 2001.H. Markram. The blue brain project. Nat Rev Neurosci, 7(2):153–60, 2006.A. C. Marreiros, S. J. Kiebel, and K. J. Friston. Dynamic causal modelling for fmri: atwo-state model. Neuroimage, 39(1):269–78, 2008.J. Roderick McCrorie. The likelihood of the parameters of a continuous time vector autoregressivemodel. Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, 5:273–286, 2002.J. Roderick Mccrorie. The problem of aliasing in identifying finite parameter continuoustime stochastic models. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 79:9–16, 2003.100