11.07.2015 Views

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JMLR: Workshop and Conference Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs 12:65–94, 2011<strong>Causality</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Time</strong> <strong>Series</strong>Causal <strong>Time</strong> <strong>Series</strong> Analysis of functional MagneticResonance Imag<strong>in</strong>g DataAlard RoebroeckFaculty of Psychology & NeuroscienceMaastricht University, the NetherlandsAnil K. SethSackler Centre for Consciousness ScienceUniversity of Sussex, UKPedro Valdes-SosaCuban Neuroscience Centre, Playa, Cubaa.roebroeck@maastrichtuniversity.nla.k.seth@sussex.ac.ukpeter@cneuro.edu.cuEditors: Flor<strong>in</strong> Popescu and Isabelle GuyonAbstractThis review focuses on dynamic causal analysis of functional magnetic resonance(fMRI) data to <strong>in</strong>fer bra<strong>in</strong> connectivity from a time series analysis and dynamicalsystems perspective. Causal <strong>in</strong>fluence is expressed <strong>in</strong> the Wiener-Akaike-Granger-Schweder (WAGS) tradition and dynamical systems are treated <strong>in</strong> a state space model<strong>in</strong>gframework. The nature of the fMRI signal is reviewed with emphasis on the<strong>in</strong>volved neuronal, physiological and physical processes and their model<strong>in</strong>g as dynamicalsystems. In this context, two streams of development <strong>in</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g causalbra<strong>in</strong> connectivity us<strong>in</strong>g fMRI are discussed: time series approaches to causality <strong>in</strong> adiscrete time tradition and dynamic systems and control theory approaches <strong>in</strong> a cont<strong>in</strong>uoustime tradition. This review closes with discussion of ongo<strong>in</strong>g work and futureperspectives on the <strong>in</strong>tegration of the two approaches.Keywords: fMRI, hemodynamics, state space model, Granger causality, WAGS <strong>in</strong>fluence1. IntroductionUnderstand<strong>in</strong>g how <strong>in</strong>teractions between bra<strong>in</strong> structures support the performance ofspecific cognitive tasks or perceptual and motor processes is a prom<strong>in</strong>ent goal <strong>in</strong> cognitiveneuroscience. Neuroimag<strong>in</strong>g methods, such as Electroencephalography (EEG),Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imag<strong>in</strong>g (fMRI)are employed more and more to address questions of functional connectivity, <strong>in</strong>terregioncoupl<strong>in</strong>g and networked computation that go beyond the ‘where’ and ‘when’ oftask-related activity (Friston, 2002; Horwitz et al., 2000; McIntosh, 2004; Salmel<strong>in</strong> andKujala, 2006; Valdes-Sosa et al., 2005a). A network perspective onto the parallel anddistributed process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> - even on the large scale accessible by neuroimag<strong>in</strong>gmethods - is a promis<strong>in</strong>g approach to enlarge our understand<strong>in</strong>g of perceptual, cognitiveand motor functions. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imag<strong>in</strong>g (fMRI) <strong>in</strong> particular isc○ 2011 A. Roebroeck, A.K. Seth & P. Valdes-Sosa.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!