11.07.2015 Views

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Causal Search <strong>in</strong> SVARIf it is the case that the VAR process is unstable with the presence of co<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>grelationships, it is more appropriate (Lütkepohl, 2006; Johansen, 2006) to estimate thefollow<strong>in</strong>g re-parametrization of the VAR model, called Vector Error Correction Model(VECM):∆Y t = F 1 ∆Y t−1 + ... + F p−1 ∆Y t−p+1 − GY t−p + u t , (12)where F i = −(I k −A 1 −...−A i ), for i = 1,..., p−1 and G = I k −A 1 −...−A p . The (k×k)matrix G has rank r and thus G can be written as HC with H and C ′ of dimension (k×r)and of rank r. C ≡ [c 1 ,...,c r ] ′ is called the co<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g matrix.Let ˜C, ˜H, and ˜F i be the maximum likelihood estimator of C, H, F accord<strong>in</strong>g toJohansen’s (1988, 1991) approach. Then the asymptotic distribution of ˜Σ u , that is themaximum likelihood estimator of the covariance matrix of u t , is:√ dT [vech( ˜Σ u ) − vech(Σ u )] −→ N(0, 2D + k (Σ u ⊗ Σ u )D +′ ), (13)which is equivalent to equation (11) (see it aga<strong>in</strong> for the def<strong>in</strong>ition of the various operators).Thus, it turns out that the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihoodestimator ˜Σ u is the same as the OLS estimation ˆΣ u for the case of stable VAR.Thus, the application of the method described for test<strong>in</strong>g residuals zero partial correlationscan be applied straightforwardly to co<strong>in</strong>tegrated data. The model is estimatedas a VECM error correction model us<strong>in</strong>g Johansen’s (1988, 1991) approach, correlationsare tested exploit<strong>in</strong>g the asymptotic distribution of ˜Σ u and f<strong>in</strong>ally can be parameterizedback <strong>in</strong> its VAR form of equation (3).2.4. Summary of the search procedureThe graphical causal models approach to SVAR identification, which we suggest <strong>in</strong>case of Gaussian and l<strong>in</strong>ear processes, can be summarized as follows.Step 1 Estimate the VAR model Y t = A 1 Y t−1 +...+A p Y t−p +u t with the usual specificationtests about normality, zero autocorrelation of residuals, lags, and unit roots (seeLütkepohl, 2006). If the hypothesis of nonstationarity is rejected, estimate the VARmodel via OLS (equivalent to MLE under the assumption of normality of the errors).If unit root tests do not reject I(1) nonstationarity <strong>in</strong> the data, specify the model asVECM test<strong>in</strong>g the presence of co<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g relationships. If tests suggest the presenceof co<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g relationships, estimate the model as VECM. If co<strong>in</strong>tegration is rejectedestimate the VAR models tak<strong>in</strong>g first difference.Step 2 Run tests for zero partial correlations between the elements u 1t ,...,u kt of u tus<strong>in</strong>g the Wald statistics on the basis of the asymptotic distribution of the covariancematrix of u t . Note that not all possible partial correlations ρ(u it ,u jt |u ht ,...) need to betested, but only those necessary for step 3.k113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!