11.07.2015 Views

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PopescuH GCj→i|u = logD i − logD ( j)i(21)The Shannon entropy of a Gaussian random variable is the logarithm of its standarddeviation plus a constant. Notice than <strong>in</strong> this paper the def<strong>in</strong>ition of Granger <strong>Causality</strong>is slightly different than the literature <strong>in</strong> that it relates to the <strong>in</strong>novations process of amixed output SVAR system of closest rotation and not a regular MVAR. The secondterm D ( j)iis formed by comput<strong>in</strong>g a reduced SVAR system which omits the jth variable.Recently Barrett et al. have proposed an extension of GC, based on prior work byGeweke (1982) from <strong>in</strong>teraction among pairs of variables to groups of variables, termedmultivariate Granger <strong>Causality</strong> (MVGC) Barrett et al. (2010). The above def<strong>in</strong>ition isstraightforwardly extensible to the group case, where I ad J are subsets of 1..D, s<strong>in</strong>cetotal entropy of <strong>in</strong>dependent variables is the sum of <strong>in</strong>dividual entropies.H GCJ→I|u = ∑︁i∈I(︂logD i − logD (J)iThe Granger entropy can be calculated directly from the transfer function, us<strong>in</strong>g theShannon-Hartley theorem:H GCHj→i)︂(22)⎛ ⃒∑︁ ⃒⃒Hi= − ∆ω ln⎜⎝ 1 − j (ω) ⃒ 2 ⎞⃒S ii (ω)⎟⎠ (23)ωF<strong>in</strong>ally Nolte (Nolte et al., 2008) <strong>in</strong>troduced a method called Phase Slope Indexwhich evaluates bilateral causal <strong>in</strong>teraction and is robust to mix<strong>in</strong>g effects (i.e. zerolag, observation or <strong>in</strong>novations covariance matrices that depart from MVAR):⎛⎞∑︁PS I i j→i = Im⎜⎝C i * j (ω) C i j(ω + dω) ⎟⎠ (24)ωPSI, as a method is based on the observation that pure mix<strong>in</strong>g (that is to say, alleffects stochastically equivalent to output mix<strong>in</strong>g as outl<strong>in</strong>ed above) does not affectthe imag<strong>in</strong>ary part of the coherency C i j just as (equivalently) it does not affect theantisymmetric part of the auto-correlation of a signal. It does not place a measure thephase relationship per se, but rather the slope of the coherency phase weighted by themagnitude of the coherency.7. Causal Structural InformationCurrently, Granger causality estimation based on l<strong>in</strong>ear VAR model<strong>in</strong>g has been shownto be susceptible to mixed noise, <strong>in</strong> the presence of which it may produce false causalityassignment Nolte et al. (2010). In order to allow for accurate causality assignment <strong>in</strong>the presence of <strong>in</strong>stantaneous <strong>in</strong>teraction and alias<strong>in</strong>g the Causal Structural Information(CSI) method and statistic for causality assignment is <strong>in</strong>troduced below.Consider the SVAR lower triangular form <strong>in</strong> (10) for a set of observations y. The<strong>in</strong>formation transfer from i to j may be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by first def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dex re-order<strong>in</strong>gs:52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!