11.07.2015 Views

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Roebroeck Seth Valdes-SosaTable 1: Types of Influence def<strong>in</strong>ed by absence of the correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependence relations.See text for acronym def<strong>in</strong>itions.Global( All horizons)Local(Immediate future)ContemporaneousStrong(Probability Distribution)By absence ofstrong, conditional, global <strong>in</strong>dependence:X 2 (t)SCGi X 1 (t)||X 3 (t)By absence ofstrong, conditional, local <strong>in</strong>dependence:X 2 (t)SCLi X 1 (t)||X 3 (t)By absence ofstrong, conditional, contemporaneous<strong>in</strong>dependence:X 2 (t)SCCi X 1 (t)||X 3 (t)Weak(Expectation)By absence ofweak, conditional, global <strong>in</strong>dependence:X 2 (t)WCGi X 1 (t)||X 3 (t)By absence ofweak, conditional, local <strong>in</strong>dependence:X 2 (t)WCLi X 1 (t)||X 3 (t)By absence ofweak, conditional, contemporaneous<strong>in</strong>dependence:X 2 (t)WCCi X 1 (t)||X 3 (t)this def<strong>in</strong>ition is appropriate for po<strong>in</strong>t processes, discrete and cont<strong>in</strong>uous time series,even for categorical (qualitative valued) time series. The only problem with this formulationis that it calls on the whole probability distribution and therefore its practicalassessment requires the use of measures such as mutual <strong>in</strong>formation that estimate theprobability densities nonparametrically.As an alternative, weak concepts of <strong>in</strong>fluence can be def<strong>in</strong>ed based on expectations.Consider weak conditional local <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>in</strong> discrete time, which is def<strong>in</strong>ed:E [ X 1 [t + ∆t]| X 1 [t,−∞], X 2 [t,−∞], X 3 [t,−∞]] = E [ X 1 [t + ∆t]| X 1 [t,−∞], X 3 [t,−∞]](7)When this condition does not hold we say X 2 weakly, conditionally and locally <strong>in</strong>fluences(WCLi) X 1 given X 3 . To make the implementation this def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>in</strong>sightful,consider a discrete first-order vector auto-regressive (VAR) model for X = [X 1 X 2 X 3 ]:X [t + ∆t] = AX [t] + e[t + ∆t] (8)For this case E [ X[t + ∆t]| X[t,−∞]] = AX [t], and analyz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluence reduces to f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gwhich of the autoregressive coefficients are zero. Thus, many proposed operationaltests of WAGS <strong>in</strong>fluence, particularly <strong>in</strong> fMRI analysis, have been formulated as testsof discrete autoregressive coefficients, although not always of order 1. With<strong>in</strong> the samemodel one can operationalize weak conditional <strong>in</strong>stantaneous <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>in</strong> dis-84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!