11.07.2015 Views

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Roebroeck Seth Valdes-SosaA. Roebroeck, E. Formisano, and R. Goebel. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g directed <strong>in</strong>fluence over the bra<strong>in</strong>us<strong>in</strong>g granger causality and fmri. Neuroimage, 25(1):230–42, 2005.A. Roebroeck, E. Formisano, and R. Goebel. The identification of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g networks<strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g fmri: Model selection, causality and deconvolution. Neuroimage,2009a.A. Roebroeck, E. Formisano, and R. Goebel. Reply to friston and david after commentson: The identification of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g networks <strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g fmri: Modelselection, causality and deconvolution. Neuroimage, 2009b.S. Ryali, K. Supekar, T. Chen, and V. Menon. Multivariate dynamical systems modelsfor estimat<strong>in</strong>g causal <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> fmri. Neuroimage, 2010.Z. S. Saad, K. M. Ropella, R. W. Cox, and E. A. DeYoe. Analysis and use of fmriresponse delays. Hum Bra<strong>in</strong> Mapp, 13(2):74–93, 2001.R. Salmel<strong>in</strong> and J. Kujala. Neural representation of language: activation versus longrangeconnectivity. Trends Cogn Sci, 10(11):519–25, 2006.J. R. Sato, D. Y. Takahashi, S. M. Arcuri, K. Sameshima, P. A. Morett<strong>in</strong>, and L. A.Baccala. Frequency doma<strong>in</strong> connectivity identification: an application of partialdirected coherence <strong>in</strong> fmri. Hum Bra<strong>in</strong> Mapp, 30(2):452–61, 2009.J. R. Sato, A. Fujita, E. F. Cardoso, C. E. Thomaz, M. J. Brammer, and Jr. E. Amaro.Analyz<strong>in</strong>g the connectivity between regions of <strong>in</strong>terest: an approach based on clustergranger causality for fmri data analysis. Neuroimage, 52(4):1444–55, 2010.M. B. Schippers, A. Roebroeck, R. Renken, L. Nanetti, and C. Keysers. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the<strong>in</strong>formation flow from one bra<strong>in</strong> to another dur<strong>in</strong>g gestural communication. ProcNatl Acad Sci U S A, 107(20):9388–93, 2010.T Schweder. Composable markov processes. journal of Applied Probability, 7(2):400–410, 1970.J. F. Smith, A. Pillai, K. Chen, and B. Horwitz. Identification and validation of effectiveconnectivity networks <strong>in</strong> functional magnetic resonance imag<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g switch<strong>in</strong>gl<strong>in</strong>ear dynamic systems. Neuroimage, 52(3):1027–40, 2009.S. M. Smith, K. L. Miller, G. Salimi-Khorshidi, M. Webster, C. F. Beckmann, T. E.Nichols, J. D. Ramsey, and M. W. Woolrich. Network modell<strong>in</strong>g methods for fmri.Neuroimage, 2010.V Solo. On causality i: Sampl<strong>in</strong>g and noise. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 46th IEEE Conferenceon Decision and Control, pages 3634–3639, 2006.D. Sridharan, D. J. Levit<strong>in</strong>, and V. Menon. A critical role for the right fronto-<strong>in</strong>sularcortex <strong>in</strong> switch<strong>in</strong>g between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc NatlAcad Sci U S A, 105(34):12569–74, 2008.102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!