Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet
Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet
Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Roebroeck Seth Valdes-SosaA. Roebroeck, E. Formisano, and R. Goebel. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g directed <strong>in</strong>fluence over the bra<strong>in</strong>us<strong>in</strong>g granger causality and fmri. Neuroimage, 25(1):230–42, 2005.A. Roebroeck, E. Formisano, and R. Goebel. The identification of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g networks<strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g fmri: Model selection, causality and deconvolution. Neuroimage,2009a.A. Roebroeck, E. Formisano, and R. Goebel. Reply to friston and david after commentson: The identification of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g networks <strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g fmri: Modelselection, causality and deconvolution. Neuroimage, 2009b.S. Ryali, K. Supekar, T. Chen, and V. Menon. Multivariate dynamical systems modelsfor estimat<strong>in</strong>g causal <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> fmri. Neuroimage, 2010.Z. S. Saad, K. M. Ropella, R. W. Cox, and E. A. DeYoe. Analysis and use of fmriresponse delays. Hum Bra<strong>in</strong> Mapp, 13(2):74–93, 2001.R. Salmel<strong>in</strong> and J. Kujala. Neural representation of language: activation versus longrangeconnectivity. Trends Cogn Sci, 10(11):519–25, 2006.J. R. Sato, D. Y. Takahashi, S. M. Arcuri, K. Sameshima, P. A. Morett<strong>in</strong>, and L. A.Baccala. Frequency doma<strong>in</strong> connectivity identification: an application of partialdirected coherence <strong>in</strong> fmri. Hum Bra<strong>in</strong> Mapp, 30(2):452–61, 2009.J. R. Sato, A. Fujita, E. F. Cardoso, C. E. Thomaz, M. J. Brammer, and Jr. E. Amaro.Analyz<strong>in</strong>g the connectivity between regions of <strong>in</strong>terest: an approach based on clustergranger causality for fmri data analysis. Neuroimage, 52(4):1444–55, 2010.M. B. Schippers, A. Roebroeck, R. Renken, L. Nanetti, and C. Keysers. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the<strong>in</strong>formation flow from one bra<strong>in</strong> to another dur<strong>in</strong>g gestural communication. ProcNatl Acad Sci U S A, 107(20):9388–93, 2010.T Schweder. Composable markov processes. journal of Applied Probability, 7(2):400–410, 1970.J. F. Smith, A. Pillai, K. Chen, and B. Horwitz. Identification and validation of effectiveconnectivity networks <strong>in</strong> functional magnetic resonance imag<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g switch<strong>in</strong>gl<strong>in</strong>ear dynamic systems. Neuroimage, 52(3):1027–40, 2009.S. M. Smith, K. L. Miller, G. Salimi-Khorshidi, M. Webster, C. F. Beckmann, T. E.Nichols, J. D. Ramsey, and M. W. Woolrich. Network modell<strong>in</strong>g methods for fmri.Neuroimage, 2010.V Solo. On causality i: Sampl<strong>in</strong>g and noise. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 46th IEEE Conferenceon Decision and Control, pages 3634–3639, 2006.D. Sridharan, D. J. Levit<strong>in</strong>, and V. Menon. A critical role for the right fronto-<strong>in</strong>sularcortex <strong>in</strong> switch<strong>in</strong>g between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc NatlAcad Sci U S A, 105(34):12569–74, 2008.102