11.07.2015 Views

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

Causality in Time Series - ClopiNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Moneta Chlass Entner HoyerThe Wald statistic for test<strong>in</strong>g vanish<strong>in</strong>g partial correlations of any order is obta<strong>in</strong>edby apply<strong>in</strong>g the delta method, which suggests that if X T is a (r × 1) sequenceof vector-valued random-variables and if [ √ T(X 1T − θ 1 ),..., √ T(X rT − θ r )] −→ N(0,Σ)and h 1 ,...,h r are r real-valued functions of θ = (θ 1 ,...,θ r ), h i : R r → R, def<strong>in</strong>ed andcont<strong>in</strong>uously differentiable <strong>in</strong> a neighborhood ω of the parameter po<strong>in</strong>t θ and such thatthe matrix B = ||∂h i /∂θ j || of partial derivatives is nons<strong>in</strong>gular <strong>in</strong> ω, then:[ √ T[h 1 (X T ) − h 1 (θ)],..., √ T[h r (X T ) − h r (θ)]] −→ N(0, BΣB ′ )(see Lehmann and Casella 1998: 61).Thus, for k = 4, suppose one wants to test corr(u 1t ,u 3t |u 2t ) = 0. First, notice thatρ(u 1 ,u 3 |u 2 ) = 0 if and only if σ 22 σ 13 − σ 12 σ 23 = 0 (by def<strong>in</strong>ition of partial correlation).One can def<strong>in</strong>e a function g : R k(k+1)/2 → R, such that g(vech(Σ u )) = σ 22 σ 13 − σ 12 σ 23 .Thus,∇g ′ = (0, −σ 23 , σ 22 , 0, σ 13 , −σ 12 , 0, 0, 0, 0).Apply<strong>in</strong>g the delta method:√ dT[( ˆσ22 ˆσ 13 − ˆσ 12 ˆσ 23 ) − (σ 22 σ 13 − σ 12 σ 23 )] −→ N(0,∇g ′ Ω∇g).The Wald test of the null hypothesis corr(u 1t ,u 3t |u 2t ) = 0 is given by:ddT( ˆσ 22 ˆσ 13 − ˆσ 12 ˆσ 23 ) 2∇g ′ Ω∇g≈ χ 2 (1).Tests for higher order correlations and for k > 4 follow analogously (see also Moneta,2003). This test<strong>in</strong>g procedure has the advantage, with respect to the alternative methods,to be straightforwardly applied to the case of co<strong>in</strong>tegrated data, as will be expla<strong>in</strong>ed<strong>in</strong> the next subsection.2.3. Co<strong>in</strong>tegration caseA typical feature of economic time series data <strong>in</strong> which there is some form of causaldependence is co<strong>in</strong>tegration. This term denotes the phenomenon that nonstationaryprocesses can have l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ations that are stationary. That is, suppose that eachcomponent Y it of Y t = (Y 1t ,...,Y kt ) ′ , which follows the VAR processY t = A 1 Y t−1 + ... + A p Y t−p + u t ,is nonstationary and <strong>in</strong>tegrated of order one (∼ I(1)). This means that the VAR processY t is not stable, i.e. det(I k − A 1 z − A p z p ) is equal to zero for some |z| ≤ 1 (Lütkepohl,2006), and that each component ∆Y it of ∆Y t = (Y t − Y t−1 ) is stationary (I(0)), that isit has time-<strong>in</strong>variant means, variances and covariance structure. A l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ationbetween between the elements of Y t is called a co<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g relationship if there is al<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation c 1 Y 1t + ... + c k Y kt which is stationary (I(0)).112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!