11.07.2015 Views

Download eBook on Survey, Search & Seizure under ... - TaxGuru

Download eBook on Survey, Search & Seizure under ... - TaxGuru

Download eBook on Survey, Search & Seizure under ... - TaxGuru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

| 16 | Voice of CAAns. The provisi<strong>on</strong>s relating to recording of statement during the courseof survey and of examining the assessee such that the said statementmay be useful for, or relevant to, any proceeding (completed,pending or future – widest meaning) are c<strong>on</strong>tained u/s 133A(3)(iii) of the Act. Also, in case the assessee does not cooperates withthe survey team by either refusing or evading to get his statementso recorded, the Income Tax Authority shall have all powers asc<strong>on</strong>templated u/s 131(1) of the Act relating to discovery, producti<strong>on</strong>,etc. of evidence (refer Sec. 133A(6)). Refer United Chemical AgencyVs ITO (1974) 097 ITR 0014 (Allahabad-HC).Therefore, while summarizing it could be said that the statement ofan assessee (Co-operative added by authors) can not be recorded <strong>on</strong>oath, the statement of an evasive and/or n<strong>on</strong>-co-operative assesseecould be recorded <strong>on</strong> oath by resorting to provisi<strong>on</strong>s of Sec. 133A(6)read with Sec. 131(1) of the Act.Q.21 What is the binding nature of a statement made during the courseof <strong>Survey</strong>? Does it carry any evidentiary value? Is there anydifference between statement recorded during <strong>Survey</strong> and duringsearch?Ans. As discussed in answer 21 supra, the statement recorded duringthe course of survey (u/s 133A(3)) is not <strong>on</strong> oath and it can beheld to have any evidentiary or binding value as l<strong>on</strong>g as there areno incriminating material in the possessi<strong>on</strong> of the revenue. Inthis regard, for better legal <strong>under</strong>standing, <strong>on</strong>e may refer to PaulMathews & S<strong>on</strong>s Vs. CIT (2003 263 ITR 101 (Kerala)).The statement recorded during survey and the <strong>on</strong>e recorded duringsearch both stand <strong>on</strong> different footing in so far as there is a legallybinding presumpti<strong>on</strong> in respect of a statement recorded u/s 132(4)which is specifically stated to be of evidentiary value. In c<strong>on</strong>tradistincti<strong>on</strong>, the statement recorded during survey has no evidentiaryvalue but <strong>on</strong>ly corroborative value, [CIT Vs Hotel Samrat (323 ITR353 (Kerala – HC))].Q.22 Is there any bar or prohibiti<strong>on</strong> or restricti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> revenue authoritiesfor enticing, forcing or seeking disclosures during <strong>Survey</strong>?Ans. Since survey is not <strong>on</strong>ly a mode of verificati<strong>on</strong> (spot) of informati<strong>on</strong>but also of augmenting tax collecti<strong>on</strong>, it had come to be regarded asa tool of obtaining c<strong>on</strong>fessi<strong>on</strong>al statements and thrust would be <strong>on</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!