11.07.2015 Views

Diffusion Processes with Hidden States from ... - FU Berlin, FB MI

Diffusion Processes with Hidden States from ... - FU Berlin, FB MI

Diffusion Processes with Hidden States from ... - FU Berlin, FB MI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A.9 Deriving the Fokker-Planck Equation <strong>from</strong> the Kramers-Moyal Forward Expansionand finally when we take ε → 0 we conclude´ t′tg(x,t ′′ )2δ(t ′′ −t ′ )dt ′′ = g(x,t)ˆ t′t2δ(t ′′ −t ′ )dt ′′= g(x,t) (A.46)and <strong>with</strong> this for (A.44)〈X(t + τ) − x〉 =ˆ t+τth(x,t ′ )dt ′ +´ t+τ ´ t′t th ′ (x,t ′ )h(x,t ′′ )dt ′′ dt ′ + ···+´ t+τt´ t′tg ′ (x,t ′ )g(x,t ′ )dt ′ + ··· (A.47)In the limit τ → 0 we get the first Kramers-Moyal coefficientD (1) (x,t) = h(x,t) + g ′ (x,t)g(x,t)(A.48)Here we should state that only the lowest terms entered in equation (A.43), because higher termswill vanish for the limit in (A.40). Integrals of the form〈ˆ t+τt···Γ(t 1 )ˆ t1t···Γ(t 2 )ˆ t2t···Γ(t 3 )ˆ t3t···Γ(t 4 )dt 1 dt 2 dt 3 dt 4 〉can only lead to results proportional to τ 2 which vanishes for the limit in (A.40). Integrals notcontaining the Langevin-force are proportional to τ n , where n is the number of integrals. For thelimit in (A.40) thus only one such integral will survive.Using these arguments we obtain for the second coefficientD (2) (x,t) = 1 2 limτ→0ˆ t+τ ˆ t′ttg(x,t ′ )g(x,t ′′ )2δ(t ′ −t ′′ )dt ′ dt ′′= g 2 (x,t). (A.49)By using these arguments for the higher coefficients D (n) we conclude that they all vanish forn ≥ 3. Thus the final result isD (1) (x,t) = h(x,t) + ∂g(x,t) g(x,t)∂xD (2) (x,t) = g 2 (x,t) (A.50)D (n) (x,t) = 0 f or n ≥ 3117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!