11.07.2015 Views

Diffusion Processes with Hidden States from ... - FU Berlin, FB MI

Diffusion Processes with Hidden States from ... - FU Berlin, FB MI

Diffusion Processes with Hidden States from ... - FU Berlin, FB MI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3 Testing the Modelalgorithm was done <strong>with</strong> a Viterbi path, generated by the following transition matrix:⎛T = ⎝0.98 0.01 0.010.01 0.98 0.010.01 0.01 0.98⎞⎠.First we did the estimation for the three states HMM parameter set⃗π gen =T gen =σ (1)gen =σ (2)gen =σ (3)gen =⎛ ⎞0.0⎝ 1.0 ⎠,0.0⎛⎞0.7 0.1 0.2⎝ 0.04 0.93 0.03 ⎠,0.77 0.23 1.3 · 10 −58( ) 1.0 0.0· 10 −35 ,0.0 1.0( ) 0.3 0.0· 10 −35 ,0.0 0.3( 163 0.00.0 163)· 10 −35 . (5.2)The re-estimated parameter set then is⃗π est =T est =σ (1)est =σ (2)est =σ (3)est =⎛ ⎞0.0⎝ 1.0 ⎠,0.0⎛⎞0.93 0.04 0.03⎝ 0.1 0.7 0.2 ⎠,0.23 0.77 9.1 · 10 −46( ) 0.3 0.0· 10 −35 ,0.0 0.3( ) 1.0 0.0· 10 −35 ,0.0 1.0( 162.8 0.00.0 163.4)· 10 −35 . (5.3)By comparison of 5.3 and 5.2, we observe the following results:• The transition matrix entries of the re-estimated parameter set for the states 1 and 3 areinterchanged.• The transition probabilities a 31 and a 32 in the third row of the re-estimated transition matrixare interchanged.• The noise intensities σ (q) <strong>with</strong> q ∈ {1,2,3} are estimated correctly.81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!