Shift-work disorderThe timing of shifts and changes to the shift schedulehave been shown to significantly affect sleep, withindividuals on rotating shifts experiencing the greatestdetriments to their sleep quality. 8 In one study, workerson rotating shifts experienced significantly more difficultysleeping than those on a stable shift schedule:20.4% of rotating-shift workers reported a sleep latency>30 minutes vs 11.5% of fixed- or night-shift workers(P < .001). 8 Furthermore, while rotating-shift workersexperienced a similar frequency of disrupted nights’sleep to that of other shift workers, they also reporteda significantly higher number of night-time awakeningsduring each disrupted night’s sleep (P < .05). In addition,approximately one-third of rotating-shift workersreported experiencing ES <strong>com</strong>pared with 19% of nightorother shift workers and 12% of daytime workers(P < .001). Therefore, it is probably not surprising thatrotating-shift workers were absent from work significantlymore often than individuals on fixed day-shiftschedules (62.8% vs 38.5%, respectively; P < .001) andhad a significantly higher annual frequency of workrelatedaccidents (19.5%) than those on fixed daytime(8.8%) or night-time shifts (9.6%) (P < .001). 8Advancing the rest period is reportedly more difficultthan delaying sleep and is thought to be responsiblefor making counterclockwise shift rotation a risk factorfor maladaptation to shift-work conditions. 9 Forwardrotatingshift patterns have long been considered morebeneficial to workers than backward-rotating patterns. 9A rapidly forward-rotating shift system has been shownto have positive effects on sleep, to reduce ES, and toimprove overall perceptions of general well-being <strong>com</strong>paredwith a slower backward-rotating shift pattern. 10However, this study did not elucidate whether the newshift pattern reduced the negative effects of shift work tothe level of those experienced by day workers. 10 The forward-rotatingsystem was found to be particularly helpfulto older workers, who experienced larger improvementsin ES <strong>com</strong>pared with younger workers. 10Shift timing in relation to “zeitgebers”Bright light is the strongest “zeitgeber”—a cue responsiblefor the entrainment (synchronization) of the circadianclock. The body’s natural circadian rhythms,and therefore the likelihood of developing ES and/orinsomnia, will persist as long as shift workers continueto expose themselves to light at times that areinappropriate for re-entrainment (for example, exposureto light in the morning in night-shift workers). 11,12One study found that workers who ensured that theyslept in a darkened bedroom, wore dark glasses when<strong>com</strong>muting home, and avoided bright light on theirdays off were least affected by a night-shift schedule. 13There is some evidence that shift workers respond torelative changes in light intensity over a 24-hour periodrather than absolute light intensity, and bright light onthe <strong>com</strong>mute home in the morning from a night shift isenough to prevent re-entrainment of the circadian clocktoward night working. 13 Interestingly, any degree of reentrainmentto the new rhythm is sufficient to confersignificant benefits. Patients who either <strong>com</strong>pletely orpartially re-entrained their circadian phase with respectto their night shift through the use of a fixed dark daytimesleep episode, sunglasses, melatonin, and brightlight at night experienced substantial benefits in ES, performance,and mood (see “Managing the patient withshift-work disorder” on page S24 of this supplement).Job satisfactionPoor job satisfaction is associated with higher levels ofES in shift workers 14,15 and may therefore predispose anindividual to SWD. Workers on rapidly rotating shiftswho had poor job satisfaction did not have shorter sleeptimes but were sleepier at work <strong>com</strong>pared with theirsatisfied colleagues (P < .001) and had poorer quality ofsleep. 14 In a 3-year study, workers on a backward-rotatingshift schedule who had poor job satisfaction had ahigher likelihood of experiencing ES than individualswho were satisfied with their work (P = .026). 15 In addition,ES significantly increased in dissatisfied workers(P < .05) over the duration of the study <strong>com</strong>pared withworkers who were content with their jobs. 15Individual physiological and lifestyle factorsAge. There is some disagreement in the literature as tothe degree to which age affects adjustment to shift-workconditions, but the weight of current evidence suggeststhat advancing age is a risk factor for developing an intoleranceto shift work. 2,3,16-19 Older individuals (ages53–59 years) appear to adapt better initially to acutesleep deprivation than younger individuals (ages 19–29years); however, older individuals show a reduced capacityfor circadian adaptation when exposed to a seriesof night shifts. 17 Thus, although younger individuals areinitially sleepier in response to a new shift pattern, theyare capable of rapidly adapting to these changes. After3 consecutive night shifts, younger workers were lesssleepy than older workers 17 ; therefore, older workers aremore likely to experience impairment while workingnight shifts even if they do not meet all of the ICSD-2criteria for a diagnosis of SWD.S20 January 2010 / Vol 59, No 1 • Supplement to The Journal of Family Practice
Gender. Shift work may affect men and women differently.In a study of crane operators, women workingnight shifts or afternoon shifts slept approximately 30minutes less than their male counterparts, 20 althoughthis is unlikely to translate into an increased propensityto develop SWD in women. However, less sleep infemale shift workers may reflect differences in the familialand/or social obligations of the male and femalemembers of this worker population. The tendency forfemale shift workers to sleep less also emphasizes thatextrinsic factors, such as childcare requirements, mayhave an impact on sleep during a shift-work scheduleeven in the absence of any innate circadian issues. 20 Amore recent study found few gender-related differencesin sleepiness and performance in workers on rapidlyrotating shifts. 14 More detailed epidemiologic data areneeded before any firm conclusions can be drawn onthe influence of gender in SWD; currently it does notappear that gender is a risk factor for SWD.Circadian preference. It has been suggested that adultscan be divided into “morning” or “evening” types 21 andthe Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)can be used to assess into which category an individualfalls. 21 Morning-type individuals, or “larks,” are most alertearly in the day and are thought to be more susceptibleto SWD, as they obtain less sleep (on average 86.8 minutesfewer) after a night shift than evening-type workers,or “night owls.” 22 However, use of the MEQ is unprovenin the evaluation of SWD. 23 Currently, there are no studiesregarding whether there is a genetic <strong>com</strong>ponent toSWD susceptibility 19 ; however, a number of reports haveindicated that a preference for “morningness” or “eveningness”is genetically determined (see “The characterizationand pathology of circadian rhythm sleep disorders”on page S12 of this supplement). In addition, aninherent vulnerability to insomnia or sensitivity to sleeploss may also lead to an innate susceptibility to SWD.Lifestyle factors. A number of lifestyle factors andchoices can cause ES and insomnia in shift workers.These include the presence of other people in the homewho may disrupt the attempted rest period; social obligationsduring the normal waking day that require thepatient to be awake when he or she should be resting;patients attempting to sleep at “normal” times duringdays off and the weekend, thus lowering the chances ofadapting to the shift-work pattern during the week; anddeliberately staying awake or being unable to sleep duringtransitions between shift patterns, leading to sleepdeprivation. These factors should be discussed with thepatient at presentation, with a view to improving sleephygiene. Such factors may trigger SWD in patients whoare predisposed to developing this sleep/wake disorder;addressing poor sleep habits in patients who do nothave SWD may help resolve their sleep problems.Shift work can prevent individuals from enjoying ahealthy lifestyle, with lower levels of physical exerciseand higher levels of smoking seen in shift workers <strong>com</strong>paredwith non–shift workers. 15,24 Poor diet and lack ofexercise as a result of social constraints or coping mechanismsassociated with shift work may lead to metabolicimbalance, which can exacerbate symptoms of ES andinsomnia. 24Habits adopted to cope with shift work may actuallyexacerbate the problems associated with night- or rotating-workschedules. For example, consumption of caffeinateddrinks to enhance wakefulness or napping atinappropriate times may worsen insomnia when tryingto rest. 25 Consumption of alcohol to induce sleep mayincrease ES during the next shift. 25 Alcohol also interactswith certain shift characteristics to increase the risk ofdeveloping SWD and was found to be particularly detrimentalto workers on a 3-shift rotation, with 51% vs 42%of regular alcohol consumers and nondrinkers experiencinginsomnia, respectively. Although alcohol didexacerbate insomnia in the other shift workers studied,the effect was not as pronounced, with 48% of workerson a 2-shift rotation who consumed alcohol experiencinginsomnia <strong>com</strong>pared with 46% of their nondrinkingcounterparts. 24Differential diagnosis of SWDin the primary care settingThe American Academy of Sleep Medicine notes that theboundary between a “normal” response and a pathologicresponse to shift work is not clearly defined and thatthe validity and reproducibility of diagnostic criterianeed testing. 19 To add to the challenges inherent in definingSWD, ES, insomnia, and a number of their sequelae(see “Symptoms of SWD” on page S18 of this article)are also indicative of a variety of disorders other thanSWD. For example, ES and/or insomnia are also symptomsof other sleep/wake disorders, sleep deprivation,pre-existing medical conditions (including mood disordersand central nervous system issues such as narcolepsyand brain injury), the use of sedative or stimulantmedications, and substance abuse. The discussion of apatient’s full medical history should assist in ruling outother potential causes for his or her symptoms, but it isalso vital to generate a differential diagnosis to excludeSupplement to The Journal of Family Practice • Vol 59, No 1 / January 2010 S21
- Page 1 and 2:
Practice Management Tips ForSHIFT W
- Page 3 and 4:
Patient QuestionnaireDo you often f
- Page 5 and 6:
Sleep/Wake LogIn bedOut of bedLight
- Page 7 and 8:
PHQ-9 QUICK DEPRESSION ASSESSMENTFo
- Page 9 and 10:
Insomnia Severity IndexPlease answe
- Page 11 and 12: Take-Away PointsSHIFT WORK DISORDER
- Page 13 and 14: SHIFT WORKDISORDERBright Light Ther
- Page 40 and 41: PrimarycareScreeningfor depressioni
- Page 42 and 43: PrimarycareThescreening questionnai
- Page 44 and 45: Shift-work disorderContents and Fac
- Page 46 and 47: Shift-work disorderThe diagnosis of
- Page 48 and 49: Shift-work disorderas heightened le
- Page 50 and 51: Shift-work disorderFigure 1 Risk ra
- Page 52 and 53: Shift-work disorderare not function
- Page 54 and 55: The characterization andpathology o
- Page 56 and 57: Shift-work disorderFigure 2 Sleep/w
- Page 58 and 59: Shift-work disorderFigure 3 Blood p
- Page 60 and 61: Recognition of shift-workdisorder i
- Page 64 and 65: Shift-work disorderthe other potent
- Page 66 and 67: Managing the patient withshift-work
- Page 68 and 69: Shift-work disorderFigure 3 Optimal
- Page 70 and 71: Shift-work disorderfor a motor vehi
- Page 72 and 73: Shift-work disordermoderate caffein
- Page 74 and 75: Supplement toAvailable at jfponline
- Page 76 and 77: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 78 and 79: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 80 and 81: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 82 and 83: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 84 and 85: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 86 and 87: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 88 and 89: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 90 and 91: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 92 and 93: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 94 and 95: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 96 and 97: Armodafinil for Treatment of Excess
- Page 98 and 99: The Epidemiology and Diagnosis of I
- Page 100 and 101: The Epidemiology and Diagnosis of I
- Page 102 and 103: The Epidemiology and Diagnosis of I
- Page 120 and 121:
CIRCADIAN RHYTHM SLEEP DISORDERSPra
- Page 122 and 123:
Table 2— AASM Levels of Recommend
- Page 124 and 125:
3.2.1.1 Both the Morningness-Evenin
- Page 126 and 127:
Five studies used one of the newer
- Page 128 and 129:
as an indicator of phase in sighted
- Page 130 and 131:
4.4 Advanced Sleep Phase DisorderBe
- Page 132 and 133:
45. Walsh, JK, Randazzo, AC, Stone,
- Page 134:
123. Van Someren, EJ, Kessler, A, M
- Page 142 and 143:
Table 1—Subject Demographicsn M:F
- Page 144 and 145:
Scale. 28 The simple reaction time
- Page 146 and 147:
Median RT (msec)1600A14001200100080
- Page 148 and 149:
10Mentally AExhaustedSharpScore8642
- Page 150 and 151:
Current Treatment Options in Neurol
- Page 152 and 153:
398 Sleep Disordersand sleep loss,
- Page 154 and 155:
400 Sleep DisordersTable 1. Treatme
- Page 156 and 157:
402 Sleep DisordersStandard dosageC
- Page 158 and 159:
404 Sleep DisordersStandard procedu
- Page 160 and 161:
406 Sleep DisordersCaffeineMelatoni
- Page 162 and 163:
408 Sleep DisordersWake-promoting a
- Page 164 and 165:
410 Sleep Disordersnight shift: ada