28.11.2012 Views

Innovation and Ontologies

Innovation and Ontologies

Innovation and Ontologies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

194 Classification – The OntoCube<br />

The topics, represented as nodes, are depicted by multi-headed links which point to the different<br />

occurrences of the object (G<strong>and</strong>on, 2002a; Krcmar, 2005). Characteristic of a topic is a set of<br />

names, occurrences <strong>and</strong> roles; roles are subgroups of occurrences. Topics can be grouped in<br />

classes (topic types) (G<strong>and</strong>on, 2002b). In a topic map, the associations can be defined freely (Garshol<br />

& Moore, 2006; Ullrich, Meier & Angele).<br />

figure 68 Toy topic map on researchers<br />

As the toy topic map above shows, every research assistant has a specific academic level, a degree.<br />

Furthermore, every researcher is assigned to a research topic which is written about by a<br />

researcher. First name, last name <strong>and</strong> age are attributes which are assigned to the researcher.<br />

5.4.4 Lightweight & Heavyweight Ontology<br />

From time to time, the literature uses the term ontology for any knowledge representation or<br />

structure. For better distinguishment, this contribution denominates simple ontologies as<br />

lightweight ontologies (Fluit, Sabou & van Harmelen, 2004; Gómez-Pérez, Fernández-López &<br />

Corcho, 2004). They contain classes <strong>and</strong> (taxonomic) relations between the classes (Gómez-<br />

Pérez, Fernández-López & Corcho, 2002).<br />

“In the short term, light-weight ontologies […] can be easier to apply in working systems. An<br />

excellent example of this […][are] ontologies used to semantically structure an information<br />

repository as a basis for search <strong>and</strong> retrieval. (Jasper & Uschold, 1999)<br />

Heavyweight ontologies encompass, besides classes <strong>and</strong> relations, also rules <strong>and</strong> axioms <strong>and</strong> have thus<br />

higher strength of expression than the lightweight versions (Gómez-Pérez, Fernández-López &<br />

Corcho, 2002).<br />

“[…] in the search area, there are obvious benefits of richer ontologies. For example, they<br />

can support inference […] used to increase both precision <strong>and</strong> recall in a semantically well<br />

structured information repository. (Jasper & Uschold, 1999)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!