28.11.2012 Views

Innovation and Ontologies

Innovation and Ontologies

Innovation and Ontologies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

344 Outlook<br />

3 Outlook<br />

This chapter introduces open research questions <strong>and</strong> indicates need for further activity in the<br />

field. First, section 3.1 illustrates three str<strong>and</strong>s of research which might be followed to further<br />

investigate the OntoGate. The research str<strong>and</strong>s target validity of the OntoGate, its potential<br />

deployment in a business context <strong>and</strong> the details of the Design Science Ontology Lifecycle.<br />

Besides their academic influence, research results on idea assessment <strong>and</strong> selection have<br />

implications for management. Therefore, in addition to the suggestions for further research,<br />

possible implications of this thesis for business are presented (cf. section 3.2).<br />

3.1 Further Research<br />

This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end.<br />

But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.<br />

(Winston Churchill)<br />

The previous sections have indicated the pioneering character of the research project <strong>and</strong> the<br />

fundamental character of research outcomes. By elaboration of the OntoGate, a method has been<br />

added to the knowledge base which is able to increase effectiveness of idea assessment during the<br />

Fuzzy Front End. It has been exemplarily shown that an ontological approach to this field is<br />

feasible.<br />

From this point of departure, three str<strong>and</strong>s of research seem particularly interesting:<br />

• the validity of the OntoGate, i.e. its correct representation of the business domain,<br />

• the potential of the OntoGate in a business context, as well as<br />

• the activities of the Design Science Ontology Lifecycle.<br />

To improve the validity of components of the OntoGate, the method ought to be applied to a<br />

representative number of companies. Research might be done along various trajectories. I suggest<br />

three possibilities which contribute to the refinement of the frame ontology.<br />

• Representation of idea assessment of technology-driven manufacturing small <strong>and</strong> medium-sized<br />

enterprises. This allows for analysis <strong>and</strong> comparison of company-specific approaches <strong>and</strong> to<br />

enhance validity of the typic OntoGate.<br />

• Representation of idea assessment of small <strong>and</strong> medium-sized enterprises from (several) different<br />

industries. Possible research questions include the analysis <strong>and</strong> comparison of company-specific<br />

approaches in each industry <strong>and</strong> refinement of the generic OntoGate.<br />

• Representation of technology-driven manufacturing large companies. Analysis <strong>and</strong> comparison of the<br />

different approaches would provide more detailed insights into the importance of company<br />

size for idea assessment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!