Northern San Luis Obispo County Coastal Trail Master Plan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Northern San Luis Obispo County Coastal Trail Master Plan 5-6 5. Widen highway shoulders to at least 4 feet (assumed to be accomplished by Caltrans as part of objectives of Highway Transportation Concept Report) 6. CCT signs and wayfinding Implementation Steps: 1. Negotiations – interagency/partner agreements, i.e. with Hearst Corporation 2. Site survey – boundaries and topography 3. Prepare preliminary design plans 4. Technical studies – biological, cultural resources 5. Environmental studies and document (including CEQA and NEPA) 6. Permit application preparation and follow-up 7. Prepare construction documents 8. Project bidding and contracting 9. Construction and related services Permit Requirements: 1. Coastal Development Permit (CDP), SLO County – all improvements 2. Grading Permit Approval from SLO County 3. Compliance with Caltrans Scenic Easement 4. Caltrans encroachment permit 5. Potentially - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Section 404 Nationwide wetlands permit Operation and Management Requirements: Responsible Party: DPR � Facility monitoring and use management � Maintain trails, replace signs, repair fences and gates � Coordinate with user groups; potentially docents Segment 2-2: Ragged Point to Arroyo de la Cruz (2.5 miles) Improvements: 1. Construct approximately 2.2 miles of native surface coastal trail 2. Close and restore about 0.2 miles of existing trail parallel to Arroyo de La Cruz 3. Widen highway shoulders to at least 4 feet (assumed to be accomplished by Caltrans as part of objectives of Highway Transportation Concept Report) 4. Bridges, boardwalks or sidepath culvert crossings with retaining walls over drainages (69-3, 69-2, 69- 1, 68-4, 68-3 and 68-2 – Arroyo de los Chinos) 5. One consolidated trail bridge over drainages (68-1,67-3 and 67-2) and trail bridge over (67-1) 6. Trail bridge or seasonal bridge over Arroyo de La Cruz (66-1) 7. Improve and formalize existing parking as trail Staging Area just south of Arroyo de La Cruz 8. Restoration and screening plantings – native 9. CCT signs and wayfinding Implementation Steps: 1. Negotiations – make interagency/partner agreements
2. Site survey – boundaries and topography 3. Prepare preliminary design plans 4. Technical studies – biological, cultural resources 5. Environmental studies and document (including CEQA and NEPA) 6. Permit application preparation and follow-up 7. Prepare construction documents 8. Project bidding and contracting 9. Construction and related services Permit Requirements: 1. Coastal Development Permit (CDP), SLO County – all improvements 2. Grading Permit and Bluff Retreat Study Approval from SLO County 3. Compliance with Caltrans Scenic Easement 4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Section 404 Nationwide wetlands permit 5. CA Regional Water Quality Control Board permit 6. CA State Water Resources Board notification 7. CA Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Permit 8. Caltrans encroachment permit – signs and sidepaths Operation and Management Requirements: Responsible Party: DPR � Facility monitoring and use management � Maintain staging area � Maintain trails and signs � Coordinate with user groups Action Plan Segment 2-3: Highway 1 Realignment Area - Arroyo de la Cruz to Piedras Blancas Lighthouse (Approx. 3.0 mi) Improvements: This segment consists of the Highway 1 realignment project which DPR is planning and designing in coordination with Caltrans The improvements are summarized in this Master Plan, but are a separate project and process that is already underway. Implementation for improvements included in this Master Plan, such as the Arroyo de la Cruz staging area improvements at the southern end of Segment 2-2, should be coordinated with the state park highway realignment trail project. DPR Plan for Realignment Area 1. Staging Area at Piedras Blancas Motel site – coordinate use of parking areas with redevelopment of the motel 2. Construct approximately 2.8 miles of gravel/decomposed granite surface multi-use trail 3. 4 trail bridges – 35 to 95 feet long 4. 360 feet of boardwalk 5. Add CCT signs 5-7
Page 1:
Northern San Luis Obispo County Coa
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgements San Luis Obispo Co
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents E.3. Biological R
Page 11 and 12:
Table of Contents Figure 4-40: Pico
Page 13 and 14:
1. Introduction and Summary Introdu
Page 15 and 16:
Introduction and Summary Objective
Page 17 and 18:
Introduction and Summary people enj
Page 19 and 20:
Introduction and Summary want to av
Page 21 and 22:
Figure 1-1: California Coastal Trai
Page 23 and 24:
Segment 3 -San Simeon Point to Camb
Page 25 and 26:
Segment 6 - Estero Bluffs and Cayuc
Page 27 and 28:
Introduction and Summary landscape.
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 1-2: Segment 1 Recommended I
Page 31 and 32:
3. 4 trail bridges - 35 to 95 feet
Page 33 and 34:
Segment 3: Broken Creek Bridge to H
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
1.8.3. Implementation Strategy Summ
Page 45 and 46:
Introduction and Summary Addressing
Page 47 and 48:
2. Setting Setting Chapter 2 provid
Page 49 and 50:
Setting Land Use Summary Table Tabl
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2-2: North Coast Area Combin
Page 53 and 54:
2.1.1. Existing Attractions and Des
Page 55 and 56:
A matrix of existing recreational a
Page 57 and 58:
Setting Figure 2-4, reproduced from
Page 59 and 60:
Setting Through the West Side Publi
Page 61 and 62:
PM Location Size Amenities 38.6 50'
Page 63 and 64:
Setting West Fiscalini Ranch Preser
Page 65 and 66:
Setting best dry-range areas. The m
Page 67 and 68:
Setting Habitat Type General Constr
Page 69 and 70:
Setting associated with unauthorize
Page 71 and 72:
Setting are an abundance of afforda
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 2-5: Tourist Serving Ameniti
Page 75 and 76:
3. Design Standards and Guidelines
Page 77 and 78:
Design Guideline or Regulation Topi
Page 79 and 80:
Design Standards and Guidelines des
Page 81 and 82:
Design Standards and Guidelines whe
Page 83 and 84:
Design Standards and Guidelines The
Page 85 and 86:
Design Standards and Guidelines 1.
Page 87 and 88:
Design Standards and Guidelines cla
Page 89 and 90:
Design Standards and Guidelines Coa
Page 91 and 92:
Design Standards and Guidelines The
Page 93 and 94:
Design Standards and Guidelines pub
Page 95 and 96:
� Noise: OPDMDs shall not produce
Page 97 and 98:
Design Standards and Guidelines Por
Page 99 and 100:
Design Standards and Guidelines sid
Page 101 and 102:
4 Master Plan Recommendations Maste
Page 103 and 104:
4.2 Trail and Support Facility Type
Page 105 and 106:
Master Plan Recommendations Trails
Page 107 and 108:
Master Plan Recommendations unimpro
Page 109 and 110:
4.2.5 Bridges and Drainage Crossing
Page 111 and 112:
Master Plan Recommendations can acc
Page 113 and 114:
Master Plan Recommendations roadway
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 4-6: Narrow Pedestrian Sidep
Page 117 and 118:
Master Plan Recommendations Figure
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Master Plan Recommendations and des
Page 123 and 124:
Figure 4-13: An existing eight foot
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Segment 1-1: County Line to Ragged
Page 129 and 130:
Figure 4-18: Segment 1-1 Recommenda
Page 131 and 132:
Segment 2: Ragged Point to to Broke
Page 133 and 134:
Master Plan Recommendations � Req
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 4-22: San Simeon Point Acces
Page 137 and 138:
Segment 2-2: Ragged Point to Arroyo
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Master Plan Recommendations Segment
Page 143 and 144:
Master Plan Recommendations need to
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Master Plan Recommendations protect
Page 151 and 152:
Segment 3: South Elephant Seal Boar
Page 153 and 154:
Master Plan Recommendations 100 fee
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158: Figure 4-35: Segment 3-2 Recommenda
Page 159 and 160: � Construct fencing to separate v
Page 161 and 162: Master Plan Recommendations Drainag
Page 163 and 164: Segment 3-3: Broken Bridge Creek to
Page 165 and 166: Master Plan Recommendations If impr
Page 167 and 168: Figure 4-40: Pico Cove Conservation
Page 169 and 170: Master Plan Recommendations Figure
Page 171 and 172: Segment 3-5: Hearst San Simeon Stat
Page 175 and 176: Segment 4: Northern Cambria to Fisc
Page 177 and 178: Master Plan Recommendations Access
Page 179 and 180: Segment 4-2: Fiscalini Ranch Preser
Page 183 and 184: Master Plan Recommendations sidepat
Page 185 and 186: Segment 5: Fiscalini Creek to Harmo
Page 187 and 188: Master Plan Recommendations the bea
Page 189 and 190: Master Plan Recommendations Segment
Page 191 and 192: Figure 4-51 : Segment 5-2 Recommend
Page 193 and 194: Segment 6-1: Estero Bluffs State Pa
Page 197 and 198: Master Plan Recommendations Drainag
Page 199 and 200: Segment 6-3: Estero Bluffs State Pa
Page 203 and 204: 5. Action Plan Action Plan This Cha
Page 205 and 206: Action Plan resources, bluff retrea
Page 207: Implementation Steps: 1. Negotiatio
Page 211 and 212: 6. CA State Water Resources Board n
Page 213 and 214: 7. CA Department of Fish and Game S
Page 215 and 216: Responsible Party: DPR � Facility
Page 217 and 218: 2. Site survey - boundaries and top
Page 219 and 220: 7. Construction and related service
Page 221 and 222: Segment 6-2 Estero Bluffs State Par
Page 223 and 224: Piedras Blancas Realignment Project
Page 225 and 226: San Simeon Point and Connections No
Page 227 and 228: Action Plan California Environmenta
Page 229 and 230: What work is required and what will
Page 231: Item Estimated Frequency AC pavemen
show all

Northern San Luis Obispo County Coastal Trail Master Plan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?