X. THE TRIAL EXAMINERS' DIVISIONThe Trial Examiners' Division, under the direct supervision of the'Chief Trial Examiner, conducts the hearings for the <strong>Board</strong>. Therules in effect during the period of this report provided that the<strong>Board</strong>, the Chief Trial Examiner, or regional director, could appointtrial examiners. In practice, however, only the Chief Trial Examinerhas designated the trial examiners, although in several instanceshe has done so after consultation with the <strong>Board</strong>. In no instanceshave trial examiners been appointed by regional directors. 1 Membersof the Trial Examiners' Division are assigned to preside over hearingson formal complaints alleging the commission of unfair labor practicesand on petitions for certification of representatives. After the,evidence has been presented in the former type of case, they preparefindings of fact and recommendations that are submitted to the parties;in cases involving certification of representatives, they prepareinformal reports for submission to the <strong>Board</strong>.The trial examiner has not fully discharged his duties if he contentshimself with merely permitting the parties to adduce such evidenceas they believe to be relevant. The rules provide that "It shall be theduty of the trial examiner to inquire fully into the facts." * * *and further that "the trial examiner shall have power to call, examine,and cross-examine witnesses and to introduce into i the record documentaryand other evidence." Experience has demonstrated that byproper exercise of this power, the trial examiner may elicit facts necessaryto enable the <strong>Board</strong> to determine the issues on the basis of aconiplete and full record, thus avoiding the unnecessary delays and,expense to the parties of a further hearing. With a few exceptions,all of the trial examiners are attorneys, most of them having broughtwith them to the <strong>Board</strong> a wide experience based on years of practicebefore the various courts throughout the country. The knowledgegained in the course of conducting many hearings tends rapidly todevelop an informed and balanced judgment in the complex field oflabor relations and enables the trial examiner to guide the parties toan adequate and orderly presentation of the material facts.During the hearing the examiner, having the same power under theAct as though the <strong>Board</strong> or a member thereof were presiding, makesrulings on objections and motions, and otherwise is responsible forthe conduct of the hearing. These rulings by the trial examiner arereviewed by the <strong>Board</strong> when it considers the entire case.' The trialexaminers may, and frequently do, consult with the Chief TrialExaminer upon matters arising during the course of the hearing.The Rules and Regulations—Series 2, effective July 14, 1939, provide that only the<strong>Board</strong> and Chief Trial Examiner may designate trial examiners.2 Under the rules effective July 14, 1939, the <strong>Board</strong> may entertain interlocutory appealsduring the course of the hearing.149
150 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDThese matters usually have to do with motions for adjournment, butfrequently problems unfamiliar to the particular trial examiner, withwhich the Chief Trial Examiner, by reason of his constant familiaritywith all the <strong>Board</strong>'s pending cases and procedure, generally has hadexperience, are discussed with the Chief Trial Examiner. This maybe either by telephone, telegraph, or letter. In short, the trial examinersare perfectly free to, and do, consult with the Chief TrialExaminer upon any matter arising during the course of the hearing,the ultimate responsibility for the proper conduct of which rests withthe Chief Trial Examiner.During a large part of the period of this report, as a part of thein-service training, the Trial Examiners' Division has held a weeklymeeting attended by all members of the trial examiners' staff whowere in Washington. Frequently, other members of the <strong>Board</strong>'sstaff are invited to attend. At these meetings matters of interestto the trial examiners are discussed and views are freely exchangedon problems of evidence, recent decisions of the <strong>Board</strong>, problemsof conduct during the hearings, and so forth. It is felt that thesemeetings have been of great assistance in making uniform practiceamong the trial examiners. Many of the ideas contained in writteninstructions to the staff were developed at these weekly conferences.Upon the conclusion of a hearing involving the alleged commissionof an unfair labor practice, and when the transcript of theevidence and the exhibits have been received, the trial examinerprepares an intermediate report. This report contains findings offact, conclusions, and recommendations. Trial examiners now uniformlyprepare these draft intermediate reports in Washington.Beginning in February 1939, in a more or less experimental way,reviews of several of the records and intermediate reports weremade by other trial examiners. This was done (1) to ascertainwhether or not the trial examiner who heard the case would bebenefitted by a, critical analysis of his report by someone as wellqualified as himself, and (2) to determine whether reversible errormight or might not have been committed during the hearing of thecase, in which event the Chief Trial Examiner could direct thetrial examiner to reopen the hearing for further evidence, or takeother measures to correct the possible error. During the periodending June 30, 1939, a number of such cases have been so reviewed.3In August 1939, the Division formally began reviewing all intermediate reports. Anumber of trial examiners were assigned temporarily to Washington for the purpose of doingthis work. These reviewing trial examiners prepare written reports which are in theform of a critical analysis of the draft intermediate report and the record. The trialexaminer receives a copy of the critical analysis and then both trial examiners discuss thedraft report and the analysis. After such conference, the trial examiner redrafts hisintermediate report if he is of the opinion that the suggestions or criticisms made by thereviewing trial examiner have merit. It is to be stressed that in all instances the trialexaminer who heard the case has the complete and final say as to the form andcontent of the intermediate report, but experience has demonstrated that the criticismshave substantially benefitted the trial examiners. Although an insufficient number ofintermediate reports have been issued under this present system to draw any definiteconclusions therefrom, it is to be noted that the number of compliances with the intermediatereports so prepared is substantially higher than heretofore. Where the trialexaminer and reviewing trial examiner have a definite difference of opinion as to the case,they discuss the matter with the Chief Trial Examiner or Assistant Chief Trial Examinerwho gives the two trial examiners the benefit of his opinion. The final report that goesout of the department, however, is the product of the trial examiner who heard the case.