J. - National Labor Relations Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

V. UNFAIR LABOR PRAWICE CASES 37TABLE IX.—Formal action taken by N. L. R. B. in unfair labor practice cases ondocket during fiscal year endtng June 30, 1939, by regionsNumber of cases in wnich—Cases transferred to N. L. R. B.by—• CornplaintswereissuedHearingswereheldInterm^diate'rreportsissuedExceptionsto;_,,,,_''''''"°-,itatereportNoncompliancewith •intermediate. reportBoardorder..Total.Numberof casesdecidedBoard 1 1Region:1. Boston 22 13 15 17 7 24 222. New York___ 51 81 55 51 5 14 70 383. Buffalo 17 17 22 23 1 24 124. Philadelphia_ 29 2.5 20 22 14 36 215. Baltimore__ 23 7 17 18 Is 34 476. Pittsburgh.__ 12 6 7 7 8 13 67. Detroit 24 19 11 14 4 18 10S. Cleveland__ 9 8 9 9 3 12 79. Cincinnati___ 11 9 10 10 1 2 13 910. Atlanta 35 34 31 35 10 45 2011. Indianapolis_ 18 12 9 12 5 17 2112. Milwaukee__ 13 6 8 10 2 12 1713. Chicago 47 36 40 40 4 44 2-114. St. Louis 9 9 11 10 5 15 1315. New Orleans_ 36 32 3 5 28 33 3718. Fort Worth__ 22 24 26 30 5 35 1317. Kansas City_ 18 18 18 15 7 22 1218. Minneapolis_ 18 16 13 12 2 14 219. Seattle. 19 10 10 11 13 24 1420. San Francisco11 23 5 5 21 28 521. Los Angeles__ 45 34 23 25 18 43 1022. Denver 7 7 10 11 • 1 2 14 20Total 522 424 371 390 7 191 588 381Cases in which the Board assumed original jurisdiction.B. ANALYSIS OF UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CASES BY UNIONSFILING CHARGESOf the 7,132 unfair labor practice cases on the docket during thefiscal year ending June 30, 1939, 2,770 were filed by unions affiliatedwith the American Federation of Labor, 3,442 cases by affiliates ofthe Congress of Industrial Organizations, 286 cases by unaffiliatedunions, and 634 cases by individuals. The Board closed 62 percentof the A. F. of L. unfair labor practice cases and 55.9 percent ofthe C. I. 0. unfair labor practice cases on the docket during this period.A comparison of the methods by which the A. F. of L. cases andthe C. • I. 0. cases were disposed of reveals that the Board securedsettlements before formal action was instituted in 51.4 percent ofthe A. F. of L. cases and in 47.0 percent of the C. I. 0. cases.
38 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDThe regional directors refused to issue complaints in 9.8 percentof the A. F. of L. cases and secured the withdrawal of 28.9 percentof the cases involving these unions. They dismissed the complaintsin 10.5 percent of the C. I. 0. union cases and secured the withdrawalof 30.7 percent of them.• Eighty-eight A. F. of L. cases and 109 C. I. 0. cases were closedby compliance with Board decisions during the year.Hearings were conducted in 128 cases involving A. F. of L. affiliatesand in 260 cases involving C. I. 0. affiliates..The Board isued decisions in 138 cases involving A. F. of L.affiliates. _This includes decisions in 50 cases based upon stipulations.Of the C. I. 0. unfair labor practice cases on the docket durina thefiscal year, the Boardissued decisions in 228 cases, 97 being based onstipulations. Thus, the Board issued decision in 5.1 percent of theA. F. Of L. unfair labor practice cases and 6.8 percent of the C. I. 0.cases on' the docket awaiting decision on June 30, 1938, or underinvestigation during the fiscal year 1938-39.Tables X through XIII show the disposition of unfair labor practicecases classified according to the unions filing the charges.TART F X -Disposition of unfair labor practice cases of A. F. of L. unions ondocket during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1939Percentage of-Percentage of-Numberofcasesal Number TotTotalof numbernumberTotal Total workers ofofworkerscases cases on involved workersclosed docketinvolvedinvolvedin easesin casesclosedondocketCases pending June 30, 1938Cases received July 1, 1938, to June 30, - -1939Total cases on docketCases closed before issuance of complaint:By settlementBy dismissalBy withdrawalOtherwiseTotal cases closed before issuance ofcomplaintCases closed al ter issuance of complaint:By settlement before hearingBy settlement after hearingBy dismissal before hearingBy dismissal after hearingBy withdrawal before hearingBy withdrawal after hearingBy intermediate report finding noviolationBy compliance with intermediaterepotBy dismissal by Board decisionBy compliance with Board decisionTotal cases closed after issuance ofcomplaintTotal cases closed July 1, 1938, toJune 30, 1939Cases pending June 30, 1939875 31.6 137;637 45.51,895 08.4 164, 834 54. 52. 770 100.0 302, 471 100. 0882 51. 4 31.9 79, 585 51. 7 26. 3168 9. 8 6. 1 7, 393 4. 8 2. 4497 28. 9 17. 9 • 27, 567 17. 9 9. 113 .8 .5 1,100 .7 .41, 560 90. 9 56. 4 115, 645 75. 1 38. 210 .6 .4 1,803 i.2 .620 1. 2 . 6 10, 720 7. 0 3. 56 .3 .2 3,040 2.0 1.0.2 .1 .1 37 (1) (1)7 .4 .3 1,544 1.0 . .54 .2 .1 577 . 4 .212 .7 .4 777 .5 . 39 . 5 .3 1,004 .7 .388 5. 1 3. 2 18, 642 12. 1 6. 2158 9. 1 5. 6 38, 144 24.9 12. 61, 718 100. 0 153, 789 100. 01, 052 38.0 148, 682 49. 2I Less than 0.05 percent.
Page 4: LETTER OF TRANSMITTALNATIONAL LABOR
Page 13 and 14: 6 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT OF NATIONAL
Page 15 and 16: FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT OF NATIONAL LA
Page 17 and 18: 10 FOITRTH ANNUAL REPORT OF NATIONA
Page 25 and 26: IV. WORK OF THE BOARDUnder the act
Page 31 and 32: ,24 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT OF NATIONA
Page 34 and 35: IV. WORK OF THE BOARD 27If all case
Page 36 and 37: V. UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CASES 29of
Page 38 and 39: TABLE VI.—Analyses of charges rec
Page 40 and 41: V. UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CASES 33Th
Page 42 and 43: TABLE VIII.—Disposition of unfair
Page 46 and 47: General Tax Tips #46TO BE PRINTED B
Page 48 and 49: V. UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CASES 41TA
Page 50 and 51: VI. REPRESENTATION CASES 43tion. In
Page 52 and 53: TABLE XV.—bisposition of represen
Page 54 and 55: VI. REPRESENTATION CASES 47'unions.
Page 56 and 57: VI. REPRESENTATION CASES 49TABLE XV
Page 58 and 59: VI. REPRESENTATION CASES 51C. ELECT
Page 60 and 61: TABLE XX.-Elections conducted by th
Page 62 and 63: VI. REPRESENTATION CASES 55(2) On a
Page 64 and 65: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 57A. IN
Page 66 and 67: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 590527,
Page 68 and 69: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED • 61T
Page 70 and 71: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 63In Ma
Page 72 and 73: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 65emplo
Page 74 and 75: ' VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 67in
Page 76 and 77: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 69D. DO
Page 78 and 79: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 71I * *
Page 80 and 81: WI. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 73that,
Page 82 and 83: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 75.tion
Page 84 and 85: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 77Annua
Page 86 and 87: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 79to th
Page 88 and 89: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 81conte
Page 90 and 91: VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 83or ot
Page 92 and 93: VIL PRINWYLES ESTABLISHED 85the wis
Page 94 and 95:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 87to de
Page 96 and 97:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 89has b
Page 98 and 99:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 91of on
Page 100 and 101:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 93In Ma
Page 102 and 103:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 95of pr
Page 104 and 105:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISTTF.D 97-th
Page 106 and 107:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 99The B
Page 108 and 109:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 101The
Page 110 and 111:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 103ploy
Page 112 and 113:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 105More
Page 114 and 115:
VII. PIIINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 107the
Page 116 and 117:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 109In a
Page 118 and 119:
VII. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 111by i
Page 120 and 121:
VIII. JURISDICTION 113This result h
Page 122 and 123:
IX. LITIGATION 115ing Mill Employee
Page 124 and 125:
IX. LITIGATION 117ployees after ref
Page 126 and 127:
IX. LITIGATION 119-which they forme
Page 128 and 129:
IX.. LITIGATION 121which had gained
Page 130 and 131:
IX. LITIGATION 123Court held that t
Page 132 and 133:
IX. LITIGATION 125B. MISCELLANEOUS
Page 134 and 135:
IX. LITIGATION 127had given full ef
Page 136 and 137:
IX. LITIGATION 129'Where the corpor
Page 138 and 139:
IX. LITIGATION 131• When the unio
Page 140 and 141:
IX. LITIGATION 133established altho
Page 142 and 143:
IX. LITIGATION 135corporation's fai
Page 144 and 145:
IX. LITIGATION 137Corp. v. N. L. R.
Page 146 and 147:
DC. LITIGATION13gopposed to that un
Page 148 and 149:
IX. LITIGATION 141B. CONSENT DECREE
Page 150 and 151:
IX. LITIGATION 143Dupuy Storage d F
Page 152 and 153:
IX. LITIGATION 145L. C. Phenix Co..
Page 154 and 155:
IX. LITIGATION 147Tenth Circuit Cou
Page 156 and 157:
X. THE TRIAL EXAMINERS' DIVISIONThe
Page 158 and 159:
X. THE TRIAL EXAMINERS' DIVISION 15
Page 160 and 161:
XI. DIVISION OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1
Page 162 and 163:
XL DIVISION OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 15
Page 164 and 165:
XI. DIVISION OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1
Page 166 and 167:
XII. INFORMATION DIVISION 159The ac
Page 168 and 169:
INFORMATION DIVISION 161,Throughout
Page 170 and 171:
XIII. LIST OF CASES HEARD AND DECIS
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
XIII. LIST OF CASES HEARD- AND DECI
Page 176 and 177:
LIST OF CASES HEARD AND DECISIONS R
Page 178 and 179:
XM. LIST OF CASES HEARD AND DECISIO
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
APPENDIX ATABLE T.—Comparison of
Page 198 and 199:
CHART A6NUMBER OF STRIKES CONTRASTE
Page 200 and 201:
' •Arpti-smix"A 193TABii -1L-Comp
Page 202 and 203:
NUMBER OF WORKERS INVOLVED IN ORGAN
Page 204 and 205:
CHART EMILLIONS OFMAN-DAYS OF IDLEN
Page 206 and 207:
APPENDIX B• ,. "Pft,LIST .7 F 3RE
Page 208 and 209:
200 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT OF NATIONA
show all

J. - National Labor Relations Board

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?