VIL PRINWYLES ESTABLISHED 85the wishes of the only union involved, has found that these employeesconstitute a single appropriate unit. Thus, the <strong>Board</strong> has designateda noncraft unit of employees in the editorial department of a newspaper,since the evidence showed sufficient relationship in the work ofthe employees in the unit." The <strong>Board</strong> has also established a unitcomposed of several but not all of the departments of an employer,where such a unit existed among the employees of other employers inthe same industry and the employees included in it had sufficient interdependenceof interests. 51 In another case, a multicraft unit wasselected by the <strong>Board</strong>, since the employees had shown their approvalof such a unit and the past history of organization and bargaininghad not been along strict craft lines. 52 Finally, the <strong>Board</strong> has grantedan industrial unit if the only union involved desired such a unit andhad bargained collectively on this basis."In certain instances where the unit proposed by the union is not inaccord with the history of collective bargaining and relates to certaingroups of employees who, because of their skill or work, are normallynot included in or excluded from a bargaining unit, the <strong>Board</strong> hasheld that the desires of these employees should determine their inclusionor exclusion. Thus, when an industrial union desired toinclude office workers with production and maintenance employees,the <strong>Board</strong> directed a separate election to ascertain the desires of theoffice workers. 54 In Matter of Hoffman, Beverage Co. and Int.Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Local No. 55,55 the <strong>Board</strong> hadpreviously designated a unit comprising all the employees. Subsequentlythe industrial union ceded the firemen and engineers to theirrespective craft unions. The <strong>Board</strong> established separate units forthe firemen and engineers, respectively, as there were similar units inthe industry and the firemen and engineers desired such units.The <strong>Board</strong> will not designate a unit, desired by a labor organization,which varies widely from the unit ordinarily sought by theunion and has no relationship to the skill and work of the employees,or the history of collective bargaining. Thus in Matter ofEl Paso Electric Co. and Local Union 585, Int. Brotherhood ofElectrical TV orkers 56 the <strong>Board</strong> refused to establish five separateunits,. each covering one department, since the union desired to bargainjointly for all five departments and had bargained and obtainedcontracts covering all five departments as one unit. The <strong>Board</strong>be Matter of Weekly Publ ications, Inc. and Newspaper Guild of New York. 8 N. L. R. B. 76.51 Matter of Times Publishing Co. and The Newspaper Guild of Detroit, 8 N. L. R. B.1170.03 Matter of Hamilton Realty Corp. and Local Joint Executive <strong>Board</strong> of Hotel & RestaurantEmployees Int. Anionic, 10 N. L. It B 858 (<strong>Board</strong> fou-d approrriate a unit incIrting(1) restaurant and kitchen employees ; (2) bartenders ; and (3) hotel service empl gyees ;each of whom bad own o rganization; the employees had authorized a joint board representing the three organizations to bar gain collectively for them).53 Matter of B. F. Sturtevant Co. and United Electrical and Radio Workers Local IndustrialUnion No. 243, 8 N. L. R. B. 825. Matter of The Hanson-Whitney Machine Co. andInt. Union, United Automobile Workers or Amer.. Local No. 428, 8 N. L. R. B. 153(<strong>Board</strong> rejected company's contention that each of its employees was a specialist in hisparticular task so that the segregation of any employees into an appropriate unit wasimpassible).14 Matter of The Electric Auto-bite Co. and Int. Union. United Automobile Workers ofAmerica Loral No. 1'. 9 N. L. R. B. 147; Matter of Willys Overland Motors, I,o. andInt. Union. United Automobile Workers of Amer., Local No. 12, 9 N. L. R. B. 924. Cf.Matter of Louis We i nberg Assoc iates. Inc. and Unit,d Wholesale and Warehouse Employ 65. 13 N. L. R. B. No. 9. footnote 4. infra.-ees. Local No."8 N. L R B. 1267. Cf. Matter of Hamilton Realty Corp. and Local Joint Executive<strong>Board</strong> of Hotel d Restaurant Employees Int. Alliance. 10 N. L. It. B. 858, footnote 52,.0 13 N. L. R. B., No. 28.
86 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDpointed out that the employees in each department did not, by reasonof their work, constitute a craft or functional group. In Matter ofTovrea Packing Co. and Amal. Meat Cutters and Butcher 'Workmenof N. Amer. 2 Local No. 313," the petitioning union was an industrialone having jurisdiction over all employees and had sought membersin all departments of the plant. The employees were not classifiedalong craft or functional lines. The union desired to include somebut not all of the departments. The <strong>Board</strong> held that this unit wasinappropriate. The <strong>Board</strong> has refused also to find appropriate aunit desired by a craft union, because the unit would include onlythe craft workers temporarily in one department of a plant andexclude similar craft workers in other departments.57aWhere two or more bona fide labor organizations do not agreeupon the scope of the unit, one claiming an industrial unit and anothera craft unit, the <strong>Board</strong> examines the unit or units proposedby each union in the light of the various factors set forth above. Inthese cases during the past fiscal year, the <strong>Board</strong>, with certain exceptionshereinafter set forth, has followed the policy of permittingthe employees whose inclusion in a craft unit is desired by the craftunion to determine for themselves whether or not they shall constitutea separate unit. If necessary, the <strong>Board</strong> will direct electionsto determine the desires of these craft employees, on the basis ofwhich the <strong>Board</strong> subsequently issues its findings as to an appropriatebargaining unit for them. 58 This principle has also been applied57 12 N. L. R. B. 1063.era Matter of Guppies Co. and Matchworkers' Federal <strong>Labor</strong> Union No. 26927, 10 N. L. R. B.168, 192.55 In the following cases the <strong>Board</strong> ordered an election to be held to ascertain the desiresof the craft employees concerning their forming a separate unit : Matter of The WatworthCo. and Pattern Makers' Ass'n of Pittsburgh, 8 N. L. R. B. 765 (election held among patternmakers) ;Matter of Vultee Aircraft Division, Aviation Manufacturing Corp. and UnitedAutomobile Workers of Amer., Local S61, 9 N. L. R. B. 32 (election held among patternmakers) ; Matter of Pacific Greyhhound Lines and Arne!. Ass'n of Street, Electric Railwayand Motor Coach Employees of Amer.. 9 N. L. R. B. 557 (election held among bus drivers)Matter of Shell Petroleum Corp. and Oil Workers Int. Union, Local No. 367, 9 N. L. R. B. 831(elections held among (1) machinists, (2) boilermakers and welders) • Matter of TVillysOverland Motors, Inc. and Int. Union, United Automobile Workers of Amer., ocal No. 12,9 N. L. R. B. 924 (election held among mechanics and machinists) ,• Matter of Armour (1 Co.and Antal. Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of N. Amer., Local No. 641, 9 N. L. R. B. 1295(election held among engineers, firemen, and their helpers) ; Matter of Reading TransportationCo. and Amal. ARR'n Of Street, Electric Railway, and Motor Coach Emplo_yeesof Amer., 10 N. L. R. B. 15 (election held among bus drivers) •, Matter of New YorkEvening Journal, Inc. and Newspaper Guild of New York, 10 N. L. R. B. 197 (election heldamong newspaper city inspectors) • Matter of Union Premier Food Stores, Inc. and UnitedRetail and Wholesale Employees of Amer., 10 N. L. R. B. 370. 11 N. L. R. B. 270 (electionsheld among (1) warehousemen, (2) meat cutters and butchers) ; Matter of Bloedel-Donovan Lumber Mills and Int. Woodworkers of Amer., Local No. 46, 11 N. L. R. B. 258(election held among truck drivers, garage men, and their he'pers). In the folowingcases where the evidence introduced at the hearing enabled the <strong>Board</strong> to ascertain thedesires of the craft employees, the <strong>Board</strong> did not order an electi ,n but immediately founda craft unit, in accordance with the desires of the employees, to be an appropriate one :Matter of The Electric Auto-Lite Co. and Int. Union, United Automobile Workers ofAmer. No. 12, 9 N. L. R. B. 147 (skilled tool, machinery, and die makers) ; matter, ofHarnischfeger Corp. and Amal. A88 it of Iron, Steel cE Tin Workers of N. Amer., Lodge1114, 9 N. L. R. B. 676 (operating engineers) ; Matter of Shell Petroleum Corp. and OilWorkers Int. Union, Local No. 867. 9 N. L. R. B. 831 (bricklayers) ; Matter of WillysOverland Motors, Inc. and Int. Union, United Automobile Workers of Amer., Local No12, 9 N.L. R. B. 924 (die sinkers) ; Matter of Kimberly-Clark Corp. and Wall PaperWorkers' Union, 9 N. L. R. B. 1287 (color mixers and machine printers) ; Matter ofPacific Mills and Dover Independent Textile Workers' Union. 10 N. L. R. B. 26 (loomfixers)Matter of Standard Cap t Seal Co. and Lodge 804, Int. Ass'n or Machinists, 10 N. L. R. B.466 (machinists and set-up men) ; Matter of The William Powell Co. ard Pattern MakersAss'n, 12 N. L. R. B. 115 (pattern makers) ; Matter of Wilson Jones Co. and MetalPolishers, Buffers, Platers ct Helpers Int. Union, Local No. 6, 12 N. L. R. B. 1351 (tooland die makers and machinists).In the NC1.47 York Evening Journal case, 10 N. L. R. B. 197, supra, two of the three unionswhose names appeared on the ballot in the separate craft election also had their nameson the ballot used in the electi .n held among the residual group of industrial employees.The board directed that in case a majority of the craft employees voted for either ofthese two unions and thereby indicated their desire to be included in the industrial unit,