Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Methodological Framework9SurveyVariable Type DISE ASER-PRATHAM IMRBInternationalEnrolment GER and NER Percentage of children Percentage of childrenIndicator enrolled by age in attending government,different types of schools private includingin rural areas: age- unrecognize ones, EGS,specific enrolment bridge course centres,ratio irrespective of type madrassas, Sanskritof school, %age of child- pathshalas and prerenattending school on primary class in anyday of visit and %age of school: Age-specificschools with less than Enrolment Ratio50 percentage of enrolled irrespective of typechildren attending school of school both inrural and urban areasDrop-out (i) Retention rate Percentage of children Percentage of drop-Indicator at primary level not enrolled categorized outs by classes amongbased on the intonever enrolled and children aged 6-13districts having drop-out children in 6-10, yearsenrolment data 11-14 and 6-14 year ageover five years: group. The same for boys(ii) Grade-to-grade and girls is not madepromotion, drop- available for the ageout and repetition group 6-14 years.rate; and(iii) Transitionfrom primary toupper primarylevel of educationFacility All including Percentage of schools Not coveredIndicators drinking water, having Grades I-V andcommon toilets I-VIII with no water andand toilets for girls: toilet provision, %age ofnumber and perce- schools with water andntage by type of toilet provision but notschoolsuseable, and %age ofschools with useablewater provision and toiletClassrooms Average number of Average number of rooms Not coveredclassrooms and available by schoolpercentage of enrolmentschools having 2and more rooms byschool typeTable 1 Contd...
10 Student Flow at Primary LevelSurveyVariable Type DISE ASER-PRATHAM IMRBInternationalTeachers PTR and average Percentage of schools Not coverednumber of teachers with no teacher and allby school type teachers available, PTRin schools having GradesI-V and I-VIII based onenrolment and attendanceon day of visitLearners’ Examination results Percentage of children Not coveredAttainment in Terminal Grade who can read by GradeIV/V and Grade and %age of childrenVII/VIII: Pass per- who can solve writtencentage and per- numerical sums by Gradecentage childrenobtained 60percentage &above marksBecause of the variations in the coverage, all the estimates cannot becompared. Enrolment ratio generated through DISE is based on theenrolment obtained from recognized schools but enrolment in unrecognizedschools is not considered in calculating the ratio. But in the two householdbasedsurveys, all the children attending schools including the unrecognizedschools, EGS, Madrasas etc. are considered. In the DISE, EGS is also notcovered. On the other hand DISE collected information from schools locatedboth in the rural and urban areas, but ASER: PRATHAM survey was confinedonly to rural areas. The IMRB International survey too collected informationfrom both the rural and urban areas. Therefore, only estimate of out-ofschoolchildren in the rural areas can be compared. However, in view ofthe variation in coverage, the estimate is not available for all the 35States & UTs of the country. The states covered vary from survey to survey.The all-India estimates based on the states covered are not comparablebut they individually present reasonably good amount of information aboutdifferent aspects of UEE. It may be recalled that information under DISEis collected as on September 30, 2005 compared to between July andOctober 2005 in the case of IMRB International and between October andDecember 2005 in case of ASER: PRATHAM survey.While comparing estimates, it may also be noted that Enrolment Ratiobased on DISE data presents coverage of child population (6-11 years) inprimary classes in schools that reported DISE data; thus children in EGSand unrecognized schools are not considered in calculating the ratio. On
Page 2 and 3: Student Flow at Primary LevelAn Ana
Page 4: ContentsForewordPrefaceAbbreviation
Page 7 and 8: PrefaceIn the recent past number of
Page 9 and 10: List of TablesTable 1 Comparative S
Page 11 and 12: xiiList of FiguresFigure 1 Percenta
Page 13 and 14: xivsuggests a consistent decline bu
Page 15 and 16: 2 Student Flow at Primary LevelIn s
Page 17 and 18: 4 Student Flow at Primary Leveltime
Page 19: 6 Student Flow at Primary Levelof h
Page 24 and 25: Methodological Framework11the other
Page 26 and 27: Methodological Framework13Table 2 r
Page 28 and 29: Table 3Percentage of Enrolled Child
Page 30 and 31: Methodological Framework17Madarasas
Page 32 and 33: Methodological Framework19Table 5IM
Page 34 and 35: Methodological Framework21this age-
Page 36 and 37: Methodological Framework23levels of
Page 38 and 39: Retaining Capacity of the System25T
Page 40 and 41: Retaining Capacity of the System27T
Page 42 and 43: Grade-to-Grade Flow Rates29universa
Page 44 and 45: Average Flow Rates31Let enrolment a
Page 46 and 47: Average Flow Rates33Table 12Percent
Page 48 and 49: Average Flow Rates35average repetit
Page 50 and 51: Average Flow Rates37Table 14Promoti
Page 52 and 53: Average Flow Rates39percent girls (
Page 54 and 55: Average Flow Rates41Table 16Repetit
Page 56 and 57: Average Flow Rates43Table 18Drop-ou
Page 58 and 59: Drop-out Rate45percent) and West Be
Page 60 and 61: Drop-out Rate47Table 21Gender-speci
Page 62 and 63: Drop-out & Repetition Rates49IV), R
Page 64 and 65: Drop-out & Repetition Rates51rate i
Page 66 and 67: Transition Rate53separately in case
Page 68 and 69: Transition Rate55to 78.01 percent d
Page 70 and 71: Efficiency of Education System57Tab
Page 72 and 73:
DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts59encoura
Page 74 and 75:
DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts61It is l
Page 76 and 77:
DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts63Table 3
Page 78 and 79:
Concluding Observations65available,
Page 80 and 81:
Annexure67Table A2Flow Rates Cohort
Page 82 and 83:
Annexure69Table A4Flow Rates Cohort
show all

Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?