Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Average Flow Rates35average repetition and drop-out rates in these states are much lowerthan the same in the other states.Figure 8Grade-wise Promotion Rate: Cohorts 2003-04 & 2004-05Further, it is observed that only 77.61 percent children in Grade I werepromoted to next grade in 2004-05 compared to only 74.05 percent incase of Grade V which is also true for 2003-04. Low promotion rate inGrade V may be because of Grade VI enrolment having been considered incalculating flow rates instead of number of graduates (in the current year),which is not available through the DISE data. Rest of the primary gradeshas above 88 percent promotion rate. The promotion rate is low despitethe policy of no detention generally being followed across the country.Very low promotion rate in Grade I in a number of states need carefulexamination. Without improving promotion rate in Grade I, efforts beingmade through ongoing programmes in attaining the goal of universalprimary education are not likely to be realised in the near future. Thestates with very low promotion rate in Grade I are Arunachal Pradesh(56.63 percent), Bihar (59.84 percent), Chhattisgarh (71.96 percent),Jharkhand (62.59 percent), Meghalaya (57.69 percent), Rajasthan (60.60percent), Sikkim (72.60 percent), Tripura (73.07 percent), Uttarakhand(70.54 percent) and West Bengal (64.22 percent). The most populous stateof the country, namely Uttar Pradesh reported a high 86.81 percentpromotion rate in Grade I in 2004-05 and Kerala, the most educationallyadvanced state, 99.41 percent. Himachal Pradesh, another educationally
36 Student Flow at Primary LevelTable 13Promotion Rate: Cohort 2003-04(Based on Common Schools for the Years 2003-04 and 2004-05)Sl Grade I Grade II Grade III Grade IV Grade V AverageNo. State/UT PrimaryGrades I-V1 Andhra Pradesh 76.33 80.43 81.25 84.22 38.04 72.552 Assam 81.76 92.85 94.30 96.06 82.75 88.963 Bihar 60.59 86.30 89.64 97.68 64.72 76.984 Chandigarh 97.32 94.98 97.69 92.58 87.30 93.915 Chhattisgarh 68.19 80.45 75.90 78.24 71.67 74.636 Gujarat 75.31 82.81 81.29 82.71 81.34 80.517 Haryana 75.73 80.51 77.88 80.15 45.08 72.748 Himachal Pradesh 84.96 91.11 92.06 90.14 81.51 87.959 Jharkhand 64.57 87.02 87.84 90.91 74.15 78.6810 Karnataka 91.06 93.29 93.26 93.60 87.22 91.7111 Kerala 97.48 93.56 93.87 91.96 94.97 94.3412 Madhya Pradesh 80.20 84.21 80.04 85.49 64.41 79.0113 Maharashtra 85.36 89.67 88.98 79.18 87.71 86.2014 Meghalaya 52.12 77.05 76.91 77.10 76.83 67.8615 Mizoram 77.94 109.07 98.79 107.22 91.62 94.8216 Nagaland 94.53 94.80 90.63 79.04 91.33 90.5717 Orissa 82.90 91.39 91.23 92.48 76.04 87.0418 Punjab 88.17 91.13 90.72 92.29 53.50 83.6419 Rajasthan 54.78 73.83 81.85 91.06 81.32 73.0520 Sikkim 71.77 75.76 68.05 70.76 66.71 70.8721 Tamil Nadu 90.81 94.55 95.46 95.63 93.41 93.9722 Tripura 69.67 83.13 68.70 72.97 75.45 73.5923 Uttar Pradesh 84.72 89.41 86.54 88.75 50.49 82.0524 Uttarakhand 68.94 85.93 84.80 88.28 68.75 78.8425 West Bengal 63.13 89.12 89.72 77.53 61.51 75.10All Districts 75.49 87.54 87.22 87.54 69.65 81.53
Page 2 and 3: Student Flow at Primary LevelAn Ana
Page 4: ContentsForewordPrefaceAbbreviation
Page 7 and 8: PrefaceIn the recent past number of
Page 9 and 10: List of TablesTable 1 Comparative S
Page 11 and 12: xiiList of FiguresFigure 1 Percenta
Page 13 and 14: xivsuggests a consistent decline bu
Page 15 and 16: 2 Student Flow at Primary LevelIn s
Page 17 and 18: 4 Student Flow at Primary Leveltime
Page 19: 6 Student Flow at Primary Levelof h
Page 22 and 23: Methodological Framework9SurveyVari
Page 24 and 25: Methodological Framework11the other
Page 26 and 27: Methodological Framework13Table 2 r
Page 28 and 29: Table 3Percentage of Enrolled Child
Page 30 and 31: Methodological Framework17Madarasas
Page 32 and 33: Methodological Framework19Table 5IM
Page 34 and 35: Methodological Framework21this age-
Page 36 and 37: Methodological Framework23levels of
Page 38 and 39: Retaining Capacity of the System25T
Page 40 and 41: Retaining Capacity of the System27T
Page 42 and 43: Grade-to-Grade Flow Rates29universa
Page 44 and 45: Average Flow Rates31Let enrolment a
Page 46 and 47: Average Flow Rates33Table 12Percent
Page 50 and 51: Average Flow Rates37Table 14Promoti
Page 52 and 53: Average Flow Rates39percent girls (
Page 54 and 55: Average Flow Rates41Table 16Repetit
Page 56 and 57: Average Flow Rates43Table 18Drop-ou
Page 58 and 59: Drop-out Rate45percent) and West Be
Page 60 and 61: Drop-out Rate47Table 21Gender-speci
Page 62 and 63: Drop-out & Repetition Rates49IV), R
Page 64 and 65: Drop-out & Repetition Rates51rate i
Page 66 and 67: Transition Rate53separately in case
Page 68 and 69: Transition Rate55to 78.01 percent d
Page 70 and 71: Efficiency of Education System57Tab
Page 72 and 73: DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts59encoura
Page 74 and 75: DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts61It is l
Page 76 and 77: DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts63Table 3
Page 78 and 79: Concluding Observations65available,
Page 80 and 81: Annexure67Table A2Flow Rates Cohort
Page 82 and 83: Annexure69Table A4Flow Rates Cohort

Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?