12.07.2015 Views

Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52 <strong>Student</strong> <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>Primary</strong> <strong>Level</strong>an increase in drop-out r<strong>at</strong>e in 2004-05. In Jharkhand, it is as high as16.98 percent compared to 11.36 percent in Bihar. Both these st<strong>at</strong>es shouldimmedi<strong>at</strong>ely initi<strong>at</strong>e necessary steps and adopt appropri<strong>at</strong>e str<strong>at</strong>egies tocheck the drop-out r<strong>at</strong>e, else because of them, the country may not achievethe goal of universal retention <strong>at</strong> the primary level within the stipul<strong>at</strong>edtime framework.Transition R<strong>at</strong>eOne of the important indic<strong>at</strong>ors on which the expansion of upper primaryeduc<strong>at</strong>ion depends is the transition r<strong>at</strong>e from the primary level to theupper primary level of educ<strong>at</strong>ion. Two years’ grade-specific enrolmentd<strong>at</strong>a along with the number of repe<strong>at</strong>ers in the l<strong>at</strong>est year is required towork out transition r<strong>at</strong>e which is defined below:New Entrants into Grade VI in year 't + 1'Transition R<strong>at</strong>e =× 100Enrolment in Grade V in year 't'E=Et+1g+ 1t ×g100The number of repe<strong>at</strong>ers subtracted from enrolment in Grade VI or V, asthe case may be, in 2005-06, divided by enrolment in Grade V or IV in theTable 24Transition R<strong>at</strong>e from <strong>Primary</strong> (VI/V) to Upper <strong>Primary</strong>(V/VI) <strong>Level</strong> of Educ<strong>at</strong>ionCohorts: 2003, 2004 and 2005Cohort Number of Boys Girls TotalDistricts2003 461 76.01 71.98 74.152004 539 79.96 75.78 78.012005, All Areas 604 83.66 80.64 82.24Rural Areas 604 79.91 76.28 78.22Urban Areas 604 100.35 99.07 99.74previous year (2004-05) and multiplied by 100 gave the transition r<strong>at</strong>e forcohort 2004-05. Similarly, transition r<strong>at</strong>es can also be worked out for theprevious years. Transition r<strong>at</strong>e in the present study has been obtained

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!