Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Drop-out & Repetition Rates51rate in primary classes but repetition rate in these states is above 5percent. Tripura even reported above 15 percent repetition rate, whileGujarat retained its position in the group having below 5 percent dropoutrate and repetition rate between 10 to 15 percent. On the other handSikkim shifted from below 5 percent drop-out rate in 2003-04 to between5 to 10 percent during the next cohort i.e. 2004-05.A number of other states have average drop-out rate between 5 to 10percent and also the repetition rate below 5 percent or between 5 to 10percent. Jammu & Kashmir and Madhya Pradesh fall under the categoryof those states which have drop-out and repetition rates between 5 to 10percent and below 5 percent respectively. On the other hand, AndhraPradesh, Maharashtra, Nagaland, Orissa and Punjab fall under the categoryhaving both drop-out and repetition rates between 5 to 10 percent.Chhattisgarh is the only other state having drop-out rate between 5 to 10percent but the repetition rate between 10 to 15 percent. Among the restof the states, Assam, Bihar, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh,Uttarakhand and West Bengal reported drop-out rate between 10-15percent in primary classes. Among these Assam and Uttar Pradesh reporteda below 5 percent repetition rate. Except Uttarakhand, the remainingstates in this category have a high repetition rate of 10 to 15 percent.Uttarakhand reported an average repetition rate between 5 to 10 percent.Out of 29 states covered, only three states have an average drop-out rateof above 15 percent in primary classes. These states are Jharkhand,Arunachal Pradesh and Meghalaya. However, Jharkhand has a low repetitionrate of 5.81 percent. Except Jharkhand, the other two states are small insize.The distribution of states by average drop-out rate and repetition ratefor the cohorts 2003-04 and 2004-05 further reveals that eight stateshave improved their positions in 2004-05 over their respective positionsduring the previous cohort i.e. 2003-04. These states are Himachal Pradesh,Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab, Chhattisgarh, UttarPradesh and Rajasthan, many of which are large in size and crucial forthe country to attain the status of universal retention. On the other hand,states such as, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Uttarakhand,Haryana, West Bengal and Meghalaya retained their respective positionsin 2004-05 over the previous cohort i.e. 2003-04. Mizoram, Tripura,Nagaland, Orissa, Sikkim, Assam, Bihar and Jharkhand, however, lost theirrespective positions in 2004-05, thus meaning that either the averagedrop-out rate or the repetition rate or both in these states have increasedfrom their previous levels in 2003-04. Bihar and Jharkhand even reported
52 Student Flow at Primary Levelan increase in drop-out rate in 2004-05. In Jharkhand, it is as high as16.98 percent compared to 11.36 percent in Bihar. Both these states shouldimmediately initiate necessary steps and adopt appropriate strategies tocheck the drop-out rate, else because of them, the country may not achievethe goal of universal retention at the primary level within the stipulatedtime framework.Transition RateOne of the important indicators on which the expansion of upper primaryeducation depends is the transition rate from the primary level to theupper primary level of education. Two years’ grade-specific enrolmentdata along with the number of repeaters in the latest year is required towork out transition rate which is defined below:New Entrants into Grade VI in year 't + 1'Transition Rate =× 100Enrolment in Grade V in year 't'E=Et+1g+ 1t ×g100The number of repeaters subtracted from enrolment in Grade VI or V, asthe case may be, in 2005-06, divided by enrolment in Grade V or IV in theTable 24Transition Rate from Primary (VI/V) to Upper Primary(V/VI) Level of EducationCohorts: 2003, 2004 and 2005Cohort Number of Boys Girls TotalDistricts2003 461 76.01 71.98 74.152004 539 79.96 75.78 78.012005, All Areas 604 83.66 80.64 82.24Rural Areas 604 79.91 76.28 78.22Urban Areas 604 100.35 99.07 99.74previous year (2004-05) and multiplied by 100 gave the transition rate forcohort 2004-05. Similarly, transition rates can also be worked out for theprevious years. Transition rate in the present study has been obtained
Page 2 and 3:
Student Flow at Primary LevelAn Ana
Page 4:
ContentsForewordPrefaceAbbreviation
Page 7 and 8:
PrefaceIn the recent past number of
Page 9 and 10:
List of TablesTable 1 Comparative S
Page 11 and 12:
xiiList of FiguresFigure 1 Percenta
Page 13 and 14: xivsuggests a consistent decline bu
Page 15 and 16: 2 Student Flow at Primary LevelIn s
Page 17 and 18: 4 Student Flow at Primary Leveltime
Page 19: 6 Student Flow at Primary Levelof h
Page 22 and 23: Methodological Framework9SurveyVari
Page 24 and 25: Methodological Framework11the other
Page 26 and 27: Methodological Framework13Table 2 r
Page 28 and 29: Table 3Percentage of Enrolled Child
Page 30 and 31: Methodological Framework17Madarasas
Page 32 and 33: Methodological Framework19Table 5IM
Page 34 and 35: Methodological Framework21this age-
Page 36 and 37: Methodological Framework23levels of
Page 38 and 39: Retaining Capacity of the System25T
Page 40 and 41: Retaining Capacity of the System27T
Page 42 and 43: Grade-to-Grade Flow Rates29universa
Page 44 and 45: Average Flow Rates31Let enrolment a
Page 46 and 47: Average Flow Rates33Table 12Percent
Page 48 and 49: Average Flow Rates35average repetit
Page 50 and 51: Average Flow Rates37Table 14Promoti
Page 52 and 53: Average Flow Rates39percent girls (
Page 54 and 55: Average Flow Rates41Table 16Repetit
Page 56 and 57: Average Flow Rates43Table 18Drop-ou
Page 58 and 59: Drop-out Rate45percent) and West Be
Page 60 and 61: Drop-out Rate47Table 21Gender-speci
Page 62 and 63: Drop-out & Repetition Rates49IV), R
Page 66 and 67: Transition Rate53separately in case
Page 68 and 69: Transition Rate55to 78.01 percent d
Page 70 and 71: Efficiency of Education System57Tab
Page 72 and 73: DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts59encoura
Page 74 and 75: DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts61It is l
Page 76 and 77: DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts63Table 3
Page 78 and 79: Concluding Observations65available,
Page 80 and 81: Annexure67Table A2Flow Rates Cohort
Page 82 and 83: Annexure69Table A4Flow Rates Cohort
show all

Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?