Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Drop-out & Repetition Rates49IV), Rajasthan (Grades II and III), Uttar Pradesh (Grade III), Maharashtra(Grade IV) and West Bengal (Grade IV) reported high drop-out rates evenin rest of the primary grades. But it is Grade V which has reported thehighest (20.27 percent) drop-out rate among the primary grades. In Bihar,it is high at 30.39 percent compared to 20.48 percent in Chhattisgarh,35.41 percent in Haryana, 31.71 percent in Madhya Pradesh, 28.71 percentin Rajasthan, 43.62 percent in Uttarakhand and 19.20 percent in UttarTable 22Distribution of States by Average Drop-out and Repetition RateCohort 2003-04RepetitionRateDrop-out RateBelow 5 % 5 to 10 % 10-15 % 15-20 % Above 20 %Below 5 % Tamil Nadu Assam Orissa UttarKerala Karnataka PradeshChandigarh -Mizoram5 to 10 % Nagaland Maharashtra Uttaranchal AndhraHimachal - PradeshPradeshMeghalaya10-15 % Gujarat Bihar Haryana RajasthanJharkhand West BengalPunjab Madhya -Pradesh15 -20 % - Chhattisgarh - - -Above 20 % TripuraSikkim - - - -Pradesh. Kerala with 1.93 percent reported the lowest drop-out rate inGrade V compared to an over-all average of 1.34 percent in its primarygrades which is also the lowest across the 29 States and UTs considered inthe analysis.Grade-specific promotion, repetition and drop-out rates separately forboys, girls and total enrolment for cohorts 2003-04 and 2004-05 are givenin Annexure A (Table A1 to A5).States Grouped by High & Low Drop-out & Repetition RatesThe States and UTs distributed according to high and low drop-out and
50 Student Flow at Primary LevelTable 23Distribution of States by Average Drop-out and Repetition RateCohort 2004-05RepetitionDrop-out RateRate Below 5 % 5 to 10 % 10-15 % 15-20 % Above 20 %Below 5 % Himachal Jammu & Assam - -Pradesh Kashmir UttarKerala Madhya PradeshKarnataka PradeshTamil Nadu5 to 10 % Mizoram Andhra Uttarakhand Jharkhand MeghalayaPradeshMaharashtraNagalandOrissaPunjab10-15 % Gujarat Chhattisgarh BiharRajasthan - -HaryanaWest Bengal15 -20 % Tripura - - Arunachal -PradeshAbove 20 % - Sikkim - -repetition rates for cohorts 2003-04 and 2004-05 are presented in Tables22 and 23 respectively. The states are distributed according to below 5percent, 5 to 10 percent, 10 to 15 percent, 15 to 20 percent and above 20percent drop-out and repetition rates. The Tables reveal that many statesimproved their respective positions in 2004-05 over their positions in theprevious 2003-04 cohort.Table 23 shows that Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Himachal Pradesh and Karnatakafall in the group having below 5 percent drop-out and repetition rates.Tamil Nadu and Kerala are in the same group during the previous cohort2003-04 also, meaning that they have retained their respective positions.They are comfortable with regard to drop-out rate in primary grades whichis also reflected in the retention rate presented in Table 10. These statesare required to sustain their efforts as both repetition as well as drop-outrate is quite satisfactory. It is Himachal Pradesh and Karnataka whichhave replaced Chandigarh and Mizoram in this group. Average repetitionrate in primary classes in Mizoram has increased from below 5 percent in2003-04 to between 5 to 10 percent in 2004-05. On the other hand a fewstates, namely, Gujarat and Tripura too have below 5 percent drop-out
Page 2 and 3:
Student Flow at Primary LevelAn Ana
Page 4:
ContentsForewordPrefaceAbbreviation
Page 7 and 8:
PrefaceIn the recent past number of
Page 9 and 10:
List of TablesTable 1 Comparative S
Page 11 and 12: xiiList of FiguresFigure 1 Percenta
Page 13 and 14: xivsuggests a consistent decline bu
Page 15 and 16: 2 Student Flow at Primary LevelIn s
Page 17 and 18: 4 Student Flow at Primary Leveltime
Page 19: 6 Student Flow at Primary Levelof h
Page 22 and 23: Methodological Framework9SurveyVari
Page 24 and 25: Methodological Framework11the other
Page 26 and 27: Methodological Framework13Table 2 r
Page 28 and 29: Table 3Percentage of Enrolled Child
Page 30 and 31: Methodological Framework17Madarasas
Page 32 and 33: Methodological Framework19Table 5IM
Page 34 and 35: Methodological Framework21this age-
Page 36 and 37: Methodological Framework23levels of
Page 38 and 39: Retaining Capacity of the System25T
Page 40 and 41: Retaining Capacity of the System27T
Page 42 and 43: Grade-to-Grade Flow Rates29universa
Page 44 and 45: Average Flow Rates31Let enrolment a
Page 46 and 47: Average Flow Rates33Table 12Percent
Page 48 and 49: Average Flow Rates35average repetit
Page 50 and 51: Average Flow Rates37Table 14Promoti
Page 52 and 53: Average Flow Rates39percent girls (
Page 54 and 55: Average Flow Rates41Table 16Repetit
Page 56 and 57: Average Flow Rates43Table 18Drop-ou
Page 58 and 59: Drop-out Rate45percent) and West Be
Page 60 and 61: Drop-out Rate47Table 21Gender-speci
Page 64 and 65: Drop-out & Repetition Rates51rate i
Page 66 and 67: Transition Rate53separately in case
Page 68 and 69: Transition Rate55to 78.01 percent d
Page 70 and 71: Efficiency of Education System57Tab
Page 72 and 73: DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts59encoura
Page 74 and 75: DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts61It is l
Page 76 and 77: DPEP Vs Non-DPEP Districts63Table 3
Page 78 and 79: Concluding Observations65available,
Page 80 and 81: Annexure67Table A2Flow Rates Cohort
Page 82 and 83: Annexure69Table A4Flow Rates Cohort
show all

Student Flow at Primary Level - DISE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?