Matrix Π relates scattering and incident Stokes vectors defined with respect to the meridianplane. The equivalent matrix for Stokes vectors with respect to the scattering plane is thescattering matrix F. In this work, we restrict ourselves to scattering for a medium that is“macroscopically isotropic and symmetric” [Mishchenko et al., 2000], with scattering forensembles of randomly oriented particles having at least one plane of symmetry. In this case, Fdepends only on the scattering angle Θ between scattered and incident beams. Matrix Π isrelated to F(Θ) through application of two rotation matrices L(π−σ 2 ) and L(−σ 1 ) (for definitionsof these matrices and the angles of rotation σ 1 and σ 2 , see [Mishchenko et al, 2000]):Π( μ,φ,μ′ , φ′) = L(π − σ 2) F(Θ ) L(−σ1); (2.5)22cos Θ = μ μ′+ 1 − μ 1 − μ ′ cos( φ − φ ′). (2.6)In our case, F(Θ) has the well-known form:⎛ a1(Θ)b1( Θ)0 0 ⎞⎜⎟⎜ b1( Θ)a2( Θ)0 0 ⎟F ( Θ)= ⎜ 0 0 ( ) ( ) ⎟ . (2.7)a3Θ b2Θ⎜⎟⎝ 0 0 − b2( Θ)a4( Θ)⎠The upper left entry in this matrix is the phase function and satisfies the normalization condition:12π∫0a1( Θ)sinΘdΘ= 1. (2.8)2.1.2. Azimuthal separationFor the special form of F in Eq. (2.7), the dependence on scattering angle allows us to developexpansions of the six independent scattering functions in terms of a set of generalized sphericallfunctions Pmn(cos Θ)[Mishchenko, et al., 2000]:LMa = ∑ P l1( )l 00(cos Θ)l=0aaΘ β ; (2.9)LMl2( Θ)+ a3(Θ)= ∑ (l+ ζl) P2,2(cosΘ)l=0α ; (2.10)LMl2( Θ)− a3( Θ)= ∑ (l− ζl) P2,−2(cos Θ)l=0LMa = ∑ P l4( )l 00(cos Θ)l=0α ; (2.11)Θ δ ; (2.12)LMb = ∑ P l1( )l 02(cosΘ)l=0Θ γ ; (2.13)LMb = −∑P l2( )l 02(cosΘ)l = 0Θ ε . (2.14)16
The six sets of “Greek constants” {α l , β l , γ l , δ l , ε l , ζ l } must be specified for each moment l inthese spherical-function expansions. The number of terms LM depends on the level of numericalaccuracy. Values {β l } are the phase function Legendre expansion coefficients as used in thescalar RTE. These “Greek constants” are commonly used to specify the polarized-light singlescatteringlaw, and there are a number of efficient analytical techniques for their computation,not only for spherical particles (see for example [de Rooij and van der Stap, 1984]) but also forrandomly oriented homogeneous and inhomogeneous non-spherical particles and aggregatedscatterers [Hovenier et al., 2004; Mackowski and Mishchenko, 1996; Mishchenko and Travis,1998].With this representation in Eqs. (2.9) to (2.14), one can then develop a Fourier decomposition ofΠ to separate the azimuthal dependence (cosine and sine series in the relative azimuth φ−φ 0 ).The same separation is applied to the Stokes vector itself. A convenient formalism for thisseparation was developed by Siewert and co-workers [Siewert, 1981; Siewert, 1982; Vestrucciand Siewert, 1984], and we summarize the results here for illumination by natural light. TheStokes vector Fourier decomposition is:LM1mmI x,μ,φ)= ∑ (2 − δm, 0)Φ ( φ − φ ) I ( x,μ); (2.15)2(0l = mmΦ ( φ)= diag{cosmφ,cosmφ,sinmφ,sinmφ}. (2.16)The phase matrix decomposition is:mm[ C ( μ,μ′)cosm(φ − φ′) + S ( μ,μ′)sin m(φ − )]LM1Π ( μ , φ,μ′ , φ′) = ∑(2− δ, 0)φ′m; (2.17)2l = mmmmC ( μ , μ′ ) = A ( μ,μ′) + DA ( μ,μ′) D ; (2.18)mmmS ( μ , μ′ ) = A ( μ,μ′) D − DA ( μ,μ′) ; (2.19)mALMmm( μ , μ′ ) = ∑ P ( μ)( μ′lBlPl) ; (2.20)l = mD = diag{ 1,1, −1,−1}. (2.21)This yields the following RTE for the Fourier component:dIμmLM( x,μ)m ω m+ I ( x,μ)= ∑ Pl( μ)BlPldx2∫Here, the source term is written:ωl = m1−1m17( μ′) Im( x,μ′) dμ′+ Qm( x,μ). (2.22)LMmmm−λxQ ( x,μ)= ∑ P ( lμ ) BlP( l−μ) 0I0Tae. (2.23)2 l=mThe phase matrix expansion is expressed through the two matrices:⎛ βlγl0 0 ⎞⎜⎟⎜ γlαl0 0 ⎟Bl= ⎜−⎟ ; (2.24)0 0 ςlεl⎜⎟⎝ 0 0 εlδl⎠
- Page 1: User’s GuideVLIDORTVersion 2.6Rob
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents1H1. Introduction
- Page 7 and 8: 1. Introduction to VLIDORT1.1. Hist
- Page 9 and 10: Table 1.1 Major features of LIDORT
- Page 11 and 12: In 2006, R. Spurr was invited to co
- Page 13: corrections, and sphericity correct
- Page 18 and 19: m⎛ P⎞l( μ)0 0 0⎜⎟mmm ⎜ 0
- Page 20 and 21: In the following sections, we suppr
- Page 22 and 23: of the single scatter albedo ω and
- Page 24 and 25: Here T n−1 is the solar beam tran
- Page 26 and 27: ~ + ~ ~ (1)~ ~ + ~ ~ (2)~ ~ − ~ 1
- Page 28 and 29: The solution proceeds first by the
- Page 30 and 31: Linearizations. Derivatives of all
- Page 32 and 33: For the plane-parallel case, we hav
- Page 34 and 35: One of the features of the above ou
- Page 36 and 37: L↑↑ ↑k (cot n −cotn −1)[
- Page 38 and 39: Note the use of the profile-column
- Page 40 and 41: βl,aer(1)(2)fz1e1βl+ ( 1−f ) z2
- Page 42 and 43: For BRDF input, it is necessary for
- Page 44 and 45: streams were used in the half space
- Page 46 and 47: anded tri-diagonal matrix A contain
- Page 48 and 49: in place to aid with the LU-decompo
- Page 50 and 51: In earlier versions of LIDORT and V
- Page 53 and 54: 4. The VLIDORT 2.6 package4.1. Over
- Page 55 and 56: (discrete ordinates), so that dimen
- Page 57 and 58: Table 4.2 Summary of VLIDORT I/O Ty
- Page 59 and 60: Table 4.3. Module files in VLIDORT
- Page 61 and 62: Finally, modules vlidort_ls_correct
- Page 63 and 64: end program main_VLIDORT4.3.2. Conf
- Page 65 and 66: $(VLID_DEF_PATH)/vlidort_sup_brdf_d
- Page 67 and 68:
Finally, the command to build the d
- Page 69 and 70:
Here, “s” indicates you want to
- Page 71 and 72:
The main difference between “vlid
- Page 73 and 74:
to both VLIDORT and the given VSLEA
- Page 75 and 76:
STATUS_INPUTREAD is equal to 4 (VLI
- Page 77 and 78:
5. ReferencesAnderson, E., Z. Bai,
- Page 79 and 80:
Mishchenko, M.I., and L.D. Travis,
- Page 81:
Stamnes K., S-C. Tsay, W. Wiscombe,
- Page 84 and 85:
Table A2: Type Structure VLIDORT_Fi
- Page 86 and 87:
DO_WRITE_FOURIER Logical (I) Flag f
- Page 88 and 89:
USER_LEVELS (o) Real*8 (IO) Array o
- Page 90 and 91:
angle s, Stokes parameter S, and di
- Page 92 and 93:
DO_SLEAVE_WFS Logical (IO) Flag for
- Page 94 and 95:
6.1.1.8. VLIDORT linearized outputs
- Page 96 and 97:
NFINELAYERS Integer Number of fine
- Page 98 and 99:
6.1.2.4. VLIDORT linearized modifie
- Page 100 and 101:
The output file contains (for all 3
- Page 102 and 103:
The first call is the baseline calc
- Page 104 and 105:
for a 2-parameter Gamma-function si
- Page 106 and 107:
Remark. In VLIDORT, the BRDF is a 4
- Page 108 and 109:
6.3.3.1. Input and output type stru
- Page 110 and 111:
Table C: Type Structure VBRDF_LinSu
- Page 112 and 113:
Special note regarding Cox-Munk typ
- Page 114 and 115:
squared parameter, so that Jacobian
- Page 116 and 117:
6.4. SLEAVE SupplementHere, the sur
- Page 118 and 119:
is possible to define Jacobians wit
- Page 120 and 121:
etween 0 and 90 degrees.N_USER_OBSG
- Page 122:
6.4.4.2 SLEAVE configuration file c