Implementation Plan - CDKN Global

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Level ofcapacity issueCapacity issue descriptionCrosscuttingUNCBD UNFCC UNCCDCountries identifying thiscapacity issueSystematic National programmes containing measures to mitigate and adaptto climate change, as in the National Hazard Mitigation PolicyX Belize;Systematic Lack of long-term stable funding (particularly for climate changeadaptation)X X AllSystematic External funding (e.g. GEF/UNDP) has enabled countries torecruit international, regional and local consultants to conductassessments, train personnel, implement public awarenesscampaigns and also complete national reports.X Dominica; Grenada; St LuciaSystematic Levels of government funding are insufficient to adequatelysupport the implementation of the environmental Conventions.X AllSystematic Broad public consultations in the decision-making process arerare.X Bahamas; Dominica; JamaicaSystematic Private sector and civil society mistrust of the public sector. X DominicaSystematic Local good practice projects are not being given nationalattention and are therefore not being replicated nationally.X JamaicaInstitutional Structure of public administration that emphasizes verticalcommunication within ministries and organizations rather thanhorizontal flows of information between ministries and agencies.Fragmented executive administrative systemX Antigua and Barbuda; Grenada; StVincent and the GrenadinesInstitutional Inadequate coordination at institutional level, with the possibilityfor overlap / competition among agencies. Alternatively, variousinstitutions pursue separate goals.X Antigua and Barbuda; Grenada;Guyana; Jamaica; SurinameInstitutional Lack of clear accountabilities (roles and responsibilities andreporting structures) for Ministries and Departments andpartners.X Bahamas; Antigua and Barbuda;Grenada; Jamaica; St Lucia; St Kittsand Nevis; SurinameInstitutional National Focal points assigned X X Belize; Grenada; JamaicaInstitutional Government’s severe balance of payments deficit, and its presentpublic service reform programme (austerity measures)X Dominica; St Lucia; St Vincent and theGrenadines
Level ofcapacity issueCapacity issue descriptionCrosscuttingUNCBD UNFCC UNCCDCountries identifying thiscapacity issueInstitutional Government agencies have too many responsibilities andinsufficient numbers of staff.X AllInstitutional Lack of management audit to determine effectiveness ofstructure and competencies.X St Kitts and NevisInstitutional Information gaps – need for research and systematic observation(e.g. hazard/vulnerability maps). Shortage and inaccessibility toscientific dataX X AllInstitutional Lack of comprehensive database – climate, environmental,ecological, social and economic. Information databases aregenerally sectoral in nature and not readily accessible by allstakeholders. Information systems in isolation of each other– compatibility issues between existing databases. Manyinstitutions do not have libraries, or systems for documenting andfiling important information.X AllInstitutional No central clearing house for data X Antigua and Barbuda; St LuciaInstitutional Established Clearing House Mechanism X BelizeInstitutional Lack of appropriate equipment and constrained transportation,operational and equipment budgets.X AllInstitutional Lack of climate change adaptation tools and techniques X Antigua and Barbuda;Institutional Capacity to conceptualize, formulate and implement policies,strategies and programmes.X BelizeInstitutional Capacity to engage and build consensus and to monitor, evaluateand report (e.g. through national meteorological services).X X Belize; Antigua and BarbudaIndividual Limited awareness of environmental issues and concerns,including inter-linkages between environmental conventions. Ahigh degree of ignorance or disregard for the convention, notablyby prominent stakeholders such as statutory bodies, large privateenterprises, etc.X X X LessapplicablehereBelize; Antigua and Barbuda; Grenada;Jamaica; DominicaIndividual Lack of technical expertise (e.g. integrated ecosystemmanagement)X All
Page 3 and 4:
DELIVERINGTRANSFORMATIONALCHANGE201
Page 5:
This document has been prepared by
Page 8 and 9:
CARICOM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE
Page 10 and 11:
Page 15:
DELIVERING TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Track TwoRegional and Nationalstrat
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Track TwoRegional and Nationalstrat
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 61 and 62:
3 FINANCINGDELIVERING TRANSFORMATIO
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 79 and 80:
5 CAPACITYDELIVERING TRANSFORMATION
Page 81:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 87:
Page 90 and 91:
Table 6: The CDEMA Comprehensive Ma
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 97 and 98:
8 ROLE OF STAKEHOLDERSDELIVERING TR
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102: DELIVERING TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE
Page 105: DELIVERING TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE
Page 108 and 109: CARICOM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE
Page 111 and 112: 10DELIVERING TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANG
Page 117 and 118: STRATEGIC ELEMENT 1:Mainstream CC A
Page 127 and 128: STRATEGIC ELEMENT 2:Promote The Imp
Page 133 and 134: STRATEGIC ELEMENT 3:Promote Actions
Page 135 and 136: Objective:Reduce GHGemissions throu
Page 141 and 142: Goal 1:Objective:Limit the effects
Page 147 and 148: Action Sector orAreaA detailed fina
Page 149 and 150: Action Sector orAreaUndertake a ski
Page 151: Level ofcapacity issueCapacity issu
Page 175 and 176: Fast-start funding opportunitiesThe
Page 177: Party Fast-Start Pledge (2010-2012)
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212:
This document is an output from a p
show all

Implementation Plan - CDKN Global

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?