12.07.2015 Views

Physiological Pharmaceutics

Physiological Pharmaceutics

Physiological Pharmaceutics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Buccal drug delivery 45However, some amino acids such as glutamic acid and lysine 12 and some vitamins such asL-ascorbic acid 13 , nicotinic acid 14 and thiamine 15 are reported to be transported via a carriermediatedprocess.Another major problem is that the dose form must be kept in place while absorptionis occurring, since excessive salivary flow may wash it away. The total area for absorptionis low compared to other routes, being in the region of 100–170 cm 25 . The taste of the drugmust be bland, otherwise it will not be acceptable. The drug must also be non-irritant, andit should not discolour or erode teeth. This may be partly overcome by using a drug deliverysystem which has a unidirectional drug outflow which is placed against the mucosa.However, these systems do have the potential for lateral diffusion and back partitioning ofthe drug into the oral cavity.Effect of position on drug deliveryWithin the oral cavity, delivery of drugs can be classified into four categories: (i) sublingualdelivery in which the dosage form is placed on the floor of the mouth, under the tongue,(ii) buccal delivery, in which the formulation is positioned against the mucous membraneslining the cheeks, (iii) local oropharyngeal delivery to treat mouth and throat and (iv)periodontal delivery, to treat below the gum margin. Variations in epithelia thickness andcomposition will undoubtedly affect drug absorption. The permeability of the oral mucosahas been reviewed by Squier and Johnson 16 . The usual test of buccal absorption measuresthe average value of penetration of the drug through all the different regions of the oralmucosa, even though it is likely that regional differences in absorption occur. It has beensuggested that drug absorption through the sublingual mucosa is more effective thanthrough the buccal mucosa, even though both these regions are non-keratinized. Thesublingual epithelium is, however, thinner and immersed in saliva, both of which will aiddrug absorption (Figure 3.5).Figure 3.5 Comparison of isosorbide dinitrate absorption when drug is presented by thebuccal and sublingual route

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!