68 | AFFORDABLE HOUSINGadvice on these matters. This recommendationwould require the new statewideCDE to work with local housingauthorities in collaboration with HUD,FEMA, and the <strong>Mississippi</strong> Home Corporation.Ideally, this program would beput together within six to nine monthsand require around $250,000. FEMAand/or HUD may be able to providesupporting funds.Recommendation 20: Employer-basedhousing assistance. Though employersdo not have legal responsibility to assisttheir employees with affordable housingoptions, in many circumstances itmay be in their best interest to do so.This is especially true for post-Katrina<strong>Mississippi</strong>, where lack of affordablehousing may severely curtail the availablelabor pool as businesses attempt torebuild. Per this recommendation, theWith such a high proportion of low-income residents in<strong>Mississippi</strong> and on the Gulf Coast, hurricane recovery in theirneighborhoods poses particularly difficult challenges■ More than 42 percent of all working families in <strong>Mississippi</strong>are low-income—the highest rate in the nation.■ Over a third of the jobs in <strong>Mississippi</strong> pay below-povertywages.■ Over 90 percent of the homes in Harrison County (Biloxi andGulfport) did not have fl ood insurance.■ About 65 percent of the housing units exposed to the stormsurge and over 57 percent of the units exposed to fl oodingwere occupied by households with incomes below the U.S.median household income level.■ In Hancock and Harrison Counties, almost three quartersof the housing units were occupied by households livingbelow the U.S. median income level.■ The majority (62%) of housing units across the three southernmostcoastal counties was built before 1980, whichmeans they were likely to be more vulnerable to wind andwater damage and will cost more than their insured valueto replace.■ In the three-county area, about one-third of the housingunits exposed to the storm surge were built before 1980; inHancock and Jackson Counties, this estimate increases tomore than 40 percent.■ In a sample of 6,404 housing units on the Biloxi peninsula,94 percent of the households lived below the U.S. medianincome level, and 80 percent of those homes experiencedextensive to catastrophic damage.■ Ninety percent of housing units in the in the Biloxi peninsulaneighborhood were built before 1980. Pre-1980 homes thatwere extensively or catastrophically damaged represented73 percent of all homes in that area.state should (a) help educate businesseson the advantages of providing financialassistance to support affordable housing,and (b) create the appropriate institutionalmechanisms to funnel corporatehousing assistance in the most efficientmanner. In the case of the gambling industry,gaming laws require that gamingoperators make peripheral communityinvestments, and gaming regulationsshould be amended to allow investingin affordable housing as a qualifyingcontribution. Fannie Mae and EnterpriseCorporation of the Delta haveworked for the last several years educatingemployers about such programsand providing tools of implementation.There are several good models availablethrough these two organizations.The state and local governments andprivate corporations should help assessthe opportunities for employers, providenecessary outreach, and assist inthe coordination of this effort. This assistanceprogram should be establishedwithin three to six months. Costs ofthis program will likely be significant,and better quantified once the housingneeds assessment discussed above iscompleted. Other than administrativesupport, most of the costs will be borneby the businesses. In many cases, however,assisting with the development ofaffordable housing will be cheaper thanthe alternatives – suffering labor shortagesor paying to bus workers in fromremote communities on a daily basis.Recommendation 21: Private FinanceInitiative. This initiative is similar tothe Section 8 vouchers program, buthere the government provides an annuitystream to private concerns to helpthem undertake development effortsthat would not otherwise be profitable.For example, a development firm mightconstruct affordable housing and col-
THE GOVERNOR’S COMMISSION REPORT | 69lect below market rents from residentsand then be eligible for a supplementalpayment directly from the government.This program could be supportedby federal, state, and local governments.Endowments from public, philanthropic,and private sources may also fund thisendeavor. This recommendation wouldinvolve collaboration with HUD, stateand local governments, the <strong>Mississippi</strong>Home Corporation, the CDE, and privatedevelopers. This program should beestablished within six to nine months.The costs of this program are potentiallyhigh; funding could be provided byfederal, state, or local governments, orby nonprofit foundation grants.Recommendation 22: CommunityLand Trusts. This recommendationinvolves the use of public and privatefunds to create nonprofit communityland trusts (CLTs) that would maintainland for affordable housing. A CLT isa nonprofit entity that would own theland but not the buildings on the land.Individual residents own the buildings,have a long-term lease on the land, andact as members of the trust. The compellingadvantage for CLTs is to ensurethat even if surrounding land values rise,homes within the trust will remain affordable.This can be achieved, for example,by structuring the charter of theCLT such that the appreciation of individualhome values cannot exceed therate of inflation. Possible mechanismsfor assembling CLTs would includeland purchases, transferable developmentrights, land swaps, or eminent domain.The Commission makes a similarrecommendation in the section onLand Use. Local governments wouldwork with housing advocacy groups toset up nonprofit community land trustentities. If necessary, the state couldprovide enabling legislation to governvarious facets of the CLT institutionalstructure. This recommendation shouldbe pursued in three to six months suchthat development decisions and landassembly activities can commence. Assemblingland trusts will be relativelycostly. Likely funding sources includefederal agencies such as HUD, the state,local governments, NGOs, developers,and local businesses interested in assistingwith housing for their low-incomework force.Incentives to Improve the Qualityand Efficiency of Affordable HousingProviding housing that is affordableto lower-income workers involves notonly ensuring sufficient supply, but alsocreating incentives to improve the qualityof construction and, therefore, thelong-term affordability of the housing.In many cases, so-called affordablehousing is extremely inefficient, and as aresult residents must spend more on energy,utilities, and maintenance than residentsof larger, more expensive homes.Yet with proper incentives, developerswill be motivated to build affordablehousing that performs as well as otherhousing in the region. Accordingly, theoverarching goal of recommendationswithin this section is to create opportunitiesfor individuals and builders toinclude consideration of the long-runoperational costs of a home, includingsafety risks, maintenance costs, waterand energy costs, and transportationcosts, within development decisions.Essentially, this approach would beginwith a set of basic minimum standardsfor building technologies and configurations,and then would identify severalcategories of improvement above andbeyond the minimum standards thatwould result in higher levels of safety,lower maintenance costs, reduced waterand energy consumption, and reducedneed for reliance upon the automobile.A coordinated set of incentive strategieswould be implemented to encouragedevelopers to build, and homeowners topurchase, housing units that meet thesehigher standards of improvement. Specificincentive strategies are outlined inthe recommendations that follow.Recommendation 23: Create a CombinedFannie Mae Mortgage Product.Fannie Mae currently offers energy-efficientmortgages under one program,and location-efficient mortgages undera separate trial program. Locationefficientmortgages are based on theidea that if one lives within a walkableneighborhood, or close to transit, thenone does not necessarily need a car andcan afford to spend a higher portion ofincome on housing. The Governor’sCommission requests that Fannie Maecombine these mortgage programs,along with a housing durability component,into a single housing efficiencymortgage product. Based on reducingthe overall lifecycle cost of a home,this program could be designated as anexperimental Katrina Recovery Mortgage.If a home is built to enhancedstandards of durability, energy efficiency,water efficiency, and location efficiency,then homeowners would qualify forthis product. Additionally, in contrastto Fannie Mae’s existing products, thisprogram should qualify homeownersfor a lower interest rate, as opposed toa larger loan. After all, when the operatingcost of a home is reduced, thenthe risk of default, and hence the rateon the mortgage, should be lower. Thestate should work with Fannie Mae todevelop this product. The goal would beto target program development withinsix months. The state should ask FannieMae for assistance in developing this