70 | AFFORDABLE HOUSINGAs insurancecompaniestake stockof theiroperationson the Coast,they should beencouraged toreduce theirrisk premiumsfor housingthat exceedsbasic waterand windsafety codes.program. The Department of Energyand EPA might also be asked to supportthis effort. The long-term costs aredifficult to predict at this point, thoughthe long-term benefits should exceedthe costs.Recommendation 24: Innovative EfficiencyMortgages. Private mortgagecompanies should be encouraged to reducetheir lending rates for affordablehousing that is efficient with respect tolong-term maintenance needs, water usage,energy usage, and location. The rationaleis that as these operational costsfor home ownership are reduced, so toois the risk of default. The <strong>Mississippi</strong>Home Corporation should encouragebanks to experiment with this idea byproviding guaranteed support as thefinancial community collects informationto assess the program. For instance,in the event of a default the state couldback the difference between the interestthat would have been charged and thelower rate being offered under this program.The <strong>Mississippi</strong> Home Corporationand the CDE should work togetherwith private companies to develop thisprogram. This effort likely would beconducted in concert with the recommendation“Create a Combined FannieMae Mortgage Product” discussedabove. This program would ideally bedeveloped within six months. In additionto working with private lenders,the state should ask Fannie Mae, as wellas the Department of Energy and theEPA, for assistance in developing thisprogram. While the long-term costsare difficult to predict at this point, thelong-term benefits should exceed thecosts.Recommendation 25: Innovative InsurancePrograms. As insurance companiestake stock of their operations onthe Coast, they should be encouragedto reduce their risk premiums for housingthat exceeds basic water and windsafety codes. To the extent that additionalsafety measures reduce the riskof damage in the case of severe weatherevents, those savings should be passedalong to homeowners. This, too, shouldhelp make housing more affordable andcreate greater incentives for developersto exceed basic codes. The federal floodinsurance program already includes reductionsfor basic safety features, butperhaps the insurance premium reductionsshould be even larger to providemore incentives for additional safetystrategies.The <strong>Mississippi</strong> Department of Insuranceshould take the lead in developingthis program and working with insurersto implement it. Within six monthsthe program should be developed. Theexpense associated with this recommendationwould likely be relativelylow. The primary cost, borne by theDepartment of Insurance and privateinsurance firms, would be administrativein nature as the program is set up.Once the program is implemented, thepremiums charged by insurance companiesfor homes built to higher safetystandards will of course be reduced, butso, too, will the required payouts thenext time a major storm hits.Recommendation 26: Future PropertyTax Rebates for Efficient Housing. Withlocation- and resource-efficient housing,local governments over time willspend less on utilities and infrastructuresuch as roads or sewer lines. For this reason,they should be able to offer reducedproperty taxes on units that are locatedin high-density mixed-use neighborhoods,are located near transit, or useenergy and water at high levels of efficiency.Unfortunately, with the existingloss of the property tax base, there is no
THE GOVERNOR’S COMMISSION REPORT | 71reasonable way for local governments tooffer such tax breaks at the present time.On the other hand, as rebuilding occursand the local tax bases are restored, itshould be possible to offer future taxbreaks, perhaps after 2008. Local governmentsshould offer lower propertytax rates after 2008 for all homes thatreduce their needs for infrastructure.The <strong>Mississippi</strong> State Tax Commission,working in conjunction with the<strong>Mississippi</strong> Public Service Commissionand the <strong>Mississippi</strong> DevelopmentAuthority, should assess the potentialinfrastructure savings that would resultfrom improved housing quality and efficiency,and subsequently recommendlevels of tax reductions that would resultin net benefits for municipalities.This evaluation may be informed bythe results of the “Best Practices Assessment”recommendation discussed earlier.Even though the tax rebates wouldnot occur for several years, the programshould be set up within six months sodevelopers may consider the future taxbreaks in their building design decisions.Relatively low costs are associatedwith this recommendation, with mostof the expenses related to administrationas the program is created. Over thelonger term, net benefits to cities, in theform of reduced infrastructure costs, willoutweigh the costs of the rebate offered.Recommendation 27: Direct publicsubsidies. The state and/or federal governmentalso should consider directlysubsidizing housing improvements designedto make affordable homes evenmore affordable by reducing energy andwater expenses, maintenance costs, andtransportation costs. The governmentcould pay the difference in the cost forhomes that are built to higher standards,for example, or offer no-interest loansfor the upgraded portion of the housingprice. Federal agencies such as HUD,EPA, or DOE and/or state agencieswould need to establish this programwithin six months so that they couldinfluence building design decisions asthey are made. The costs likely wouldbe high, and would be borne by federalor state agencies responsible for theprograms.New Institutional RequirementsThe destruction of homes in South<strong>Mississippi</strong> necessitated a variety ofnew institutional roles within the state.To ensure that a sufficient quantity ofaffordable housing can be rebuilt asquickly as possibly, the Commissionrecommends that the state review eachof these needs and either: (a) delegateauthority for meeting the need, as wellas allocate any additional required funding,to an existing entity; or (b) authorizeand fund the creation of a new entityto fulfill the need.