12.07.2015 Views

Evaluation Study MSE Cluster Development - Ministry of Micro ...

Evaluation Study MSE Cluster Development - Ministry of Micro ...

Evaluation Study MSE Cluster Development - Ministry of Micro ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter No: 6 – Hard Interventions in Sampled <strong>Cluster</strong>s6.6 Stages <strong>of</strong> Intervention under <strong>MSE</strong>-CDPAt the time this evaluation study was conducted it was observed that <strong>of</strong> the 22 sampledclusters as many as 11 were still at the 1st stage <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t interventions, as indicated inTable 6.1. This by itself is a fairly disturbing revelation and indicates the need tocatalyze s<strong>of</strong>t interventions with added vigour during the 11th plan period. Thisstagnation also reflects the ineffectiveness <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t interventions and requires theimmediate attention <strong>of</strong> programme functionaries.Table No.-6.1: SUMMARY TABLE ON STATUS OF INTERVENTIONSSl. Coverage and Stages <strong>of</strong>ProgressStage <strong>of</strong>ProgrammeImplementationNumber <strong>of</strong>Sampled<strong>Cluster</strong>s1. Total Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cluster</strong>sCovered (during <strong>Study</strong>)%DistributionNA 22 100.002. <strong>Cluster</strong>s Implementing S<strong>of</strong>tInterventions (as on date)3. Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cluster</strong>s where inSPVs have been formed andRegistered4. Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cluster</strong>s where inSPVs are formulating DPRs forApproval5. Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cluster</strong>s where inConstruction and Installation <strong>of</strong>CFC is in Progress6. Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cluster</strong>s where inCFCs have been Commissioned &are FunctionalI 11 50.00II 11 50.00III 2 9.09IV 7 31.82V 2 9.09It is however encouraging to note that the remaining 11 sampled clusters havesuccessfully negotiated the IInd stage <strong>of</strong> the formation and registration <strong>of</strong> SPVs.However Table 6.1 also indicates that in the case <strong>of</strong> 2 SPVs the DPR is either yet to beformulated or has been formulated but not approved. They are thus stuck in the IIIrdstage and have not progressed beyond it. There are as many as 7 SPVs who have nowprogressed to the IVth stage and where the CFC is in the process <strong>of</strong> being constructed.It may be mentioned that there have been delays in the construction process mainly onaccount <strong>of</strong> the release <strong>of</strong> funds and disbursement <strong>of</strong> payments to equipment suppliers.In some cases as we shall see later, the conditions <strong>of</strong> sale have not been enforced andsuppliers have defaulted on the timely delivery and installation <strong>of</strong> equipment. It is only inthe case <strong>of</strong> two clusters that the respective SPVs have commissioned the CFC and theseare functional.It may be mentioned here that the timely implementation <strong>of</strong> various stages <strong>of</strong> the <strong>MSE</strong>-CDP depends to a great extent on the clarity and lack <strong>of</strong> ambiguity in the programmeguidelines and though it is claimed that these guidelines and norms werecomprehensively revised in March 2006, it is felt that immediate efforts are necessary toreview and reformulate the detailed guidelines <strong>of</strong> the programme to remove existingambiguities and lack <strong>of</strong> clarity.109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!