2011 Anniversary Yearbook - EUFEPS today and history
2011 Anniversary Yearbook - EUFEPS today and history
2011 Anniversary Yearbook - EUFEPS today and history
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• NeuroMed, which will develop <strong>and</strong><br />
validate novel surrogate markers based<br />
upon in vitro <strong>and</strong> in vivo models in<br />
animal <strong>and</strong> humans, using Alzheimer´s<br />
disease as a testing platform.<br />
• PredTox will deliver new biomarkers<br />
of toxicity <strong>and</strong> a greater underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
of mechanisms of toxicity.<br />
The experience gained here will be used<br />
in the Joint Technology Initiative for<br />
Innovative Medicines in Europe under<br />
FP7.<br />
EU Joint Technology Initiative<br />
(JTI)<br />
A Joint Technology Initiative, via Art.<br />
171 of the EC Treaty, should finance<br />
the Innovative Medicines Initiative,<br />
with its SRA <strong>and</strong> ETP. However, this<br />
does not happen automatically as 6 JTIs<br />
are currently competing; Innovative<br />
Medicines, Aeronotics, Hydrogen <strong>and</strong><br />
Fuel Cells, Embedded Systems, Nano<br />
Electronics, GMES (Global Monitoring<br />
for Environment <strong>and</strong> Security).<br />
The decision will be taken by<br />
a “Competitiveness Council” of all<br />
European Research Ministries, later this<br />
year. Their decision will be based on;<br />
• European added value<br />
• Inability of existing instruments to<br />
achieve their objectives<br />
• Degree <strong>and</strong> clarity of definition of<br />
objectives to be pursued<br />
• Strength of financial/resource<br />
commitment by industry<br />
• Contribution to broader policy<br />
objectives<br />
• Scale of the impact on industrial<br />
competitiveness <strong>and</strong> growth<br />
The IMI JTI is high on the priority list, but<br />
nothing is certain. Therefore it needs your<br />
support, see Mirror Platforms below.<br />
The overall intentions for the JTI on<br />
Innovative Medicines are to;<br />
• provide a mechanism for rapid <strong>and</strong><br />
systematic take up, evaluation <strong>and</strong><br />
translation of research results into new<br />
methods <strong>and</strong> techniques for use in the<br />
medicines development process<br />
• facilitate the provision of advice by<br />
regulators for setting up “tailor made”<br />
validations<br />
• provide “neutral ground” for the necessary<br />
collaboration between all<br />
stakeholders, thereby removing the<br />
suspicions of “biased collaborations”<br />
that undermine collaborations <strong>today</strong><br />
• foster the development of a new «tool-<br />
box» (toxicology tests, biomarkers,<br />
clinical trials protocols, etc.) for drug<br />
developers to reduce the risk of failure<br />
during clinical trials<br />
• provide the infrastructure for validation<br />
of the new tools in view of rapid uptake<br />
into regulatory <strong>and</strong> industry practice<br />
• set up ‘knowledge platforms’ pooling<br />
data from toxicology testing <strong>and</strong><br />
biomarker validation, which will be<br />
available to all researchers (industry<br />
<strong>and</strong> academic)<br />
Since the necessary R&D cannot be done<br />
by any one member of the stakeholders<br />
group alone, the IMI will facilitate the<br />
participation of all stakeholder groups<br />
in the research, following open calls <strong>and</strong><br />
peer review. Research can be done by<br />
“anybody” as long as it is carried out in<br />
Europe.<br />
At the present stage, March 2006, the<br />
EU money allocated to FP7 are expected<br />
to be considerably less than originally<br />
anticipated. So instead of 400 Mio. Euro<br />
per year, the Commission works with a<br />
plan where they allocate 50 Mio. Euro in<br />
the first year, followed by an increase in<br />
subsequent years, when money becomes<br />
more abundant in the EU system. The<br />
money will be given to public-private<br />
partnerships where industry pays for all of<br />
their own costs <strong>and</strong> the Commission pays<br />
for the rest. The industry has bound itself<br />
to spend the same amount of money as the<br />
Commission per year.<br />
Proposed governance structure of<br />
the IMI JTI<br />
The IMI JTI Board shall be composed by<br />
the Founding Members (EC <strong>and</strong> EFPIA)<br />
<strong>and</strong> by potential new funding members.<br />
The Executive Office is responsible<br />
for day-to-day management regarding the<br />
implementation of the SRA.<br />
The Scientific Committee is an<br />
advisory body to the Board. Collectively<br />
it shall have the competencies to cover the<br />
complete drug development process <strong>and</strong><br />
have a balance composition of academia,<br />
patients, industry <strong>and</strong> regulatory<br />
representatives. In particular it shall advise<br />
on the continued relevance of the SRA<br />
<strong>and</strong> review the scientific achievements of<br />
the SRA implementation <strong>and</strong> advise the<br />
board accordingly. Finally it shall advise<br />
on the composition of the peer review<br />
committees.<br />
The Stakeholder Forum should be<br />
LI<br />
open to all stakeholders <strong>and</strong> convene<br />
annually. It shall ensure the openness <strong>and</strong><br />
transparency of IMI <strong>and</strong> it can provide<br />
strategic advice to the Board.<br />
The Member States Group shall<br />
approve the composition of Scientific<br />
Committee. It shall facilitate rapid<br />
dissemination of information <strong>and</strong> ensure<br />
co-ordination with national activities.<br />
Especially it shall be responsible for<br />
the implementation of Education <strong>and</strong><br />
Training.<br />
It is noteworthy that the organisation<br />
of the Stakeholder Forum is so vaguely<br />
presented. This leaves room for European<br />
organisations linked to the drug<br />
development process to act on this stage.<br />
Conventional support through FP7<br />
If the JTI for Innovative Medicines is<br />
adopted at its intended scale, one should<br />
not expect to see many calls specifically<br />
related to the pharmaceutical research in<br />
the ordinary FP7. However, it will still be<br />
possible to apply for general instruments<br />
like Marie Curie fellowships etc.<br />
Mirror Technological Platforms<br />
In parallel to the European Innovative<br />
Medicines Initiative, corresponding<br />
regional <strong>and</strong> national platforms have been<br />
established in Denmark-Sweden, The<br />
Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, Spain, France <strong>and</strong> Romania.<br />
In this connection, it is important that<br />
all researchers engaged in pharma in one<br />
way or another support these initiatives;<br />
indicating to the national governments that<br />
there are local researchers, who will step<br />
in, if their respective ministers support the<br />
JTI on Innovative Medicines. In this way,<br />
your personal effort can strengthen the<br />
pharmaceutical sciences in Europe <strong>and</strong><br />
vice versa.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The NSMF initiative has grown in size<br />
<strong>and</strong> importance, but it has also been<br />
substantially added to <strong>and</strong> changed<br />
br<strong>and</strong>ing, appearing under a new name:<br />
Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI).<br />
Still the decisive step of significant funding<br />
has not yet been taken, for which reason<br />
I appeal to all <strong>EUFEPS</strong> membership not<br />
to lose any opportunity to promote <strong>and</strong><br />
support the idea in your local environment:<br />
namely that Europe needs the Innovative<br />
Medicines Initiative to compete in the<br />
global arena for pharmaceuticals.<br />
Together we can do it!