12.07.2015 Views

Proper Names in the Light of Theoretical Onomastics

Proper Names in the Light of Theoretical Onomastics

Proper Names in the Light of Theoretical Onomastics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Proper</strong> <strong>Names</strong> In <strong>the</strong> <strong>Light</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Theoretical</strong> <strong>Onomastics</strong>113from <strong>the</strong> viewpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> personal nam<strong>in</strong>g, i. e. it expressed that <strong>the</strong> feature〈k<strong>in</strong>ship with a family as a whole〉 was l<strong>in</strong>ked with <strong>the</strong> feature 〈heredity〉.Due to <strong>the</strong>se features, hierarchically, it became <strong>the</strong> basic component <strong>of</strong> amodel <strong>of</strong> nam<strong>in</strong>g. In such a way, <strong>the</strong> surname was constituted as <strong>the</strong> newfunctional component. The Christian name took <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gcomponent. The so-called first nam<strong>in</strong>g system was transformed<strong>in</strong>to a b<strong>in</strong>ary nam<strong>in</strong>g system.S<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> persons, not only are <strong>in</strong>dividuals identified anddifferentiated as such but also certa<strong>in</strong> means <strong>of</strong> expression are used todesignate <strong>the</strong>ir relatives and non-relatives respectively; <strong>in</strong> anthroponymy,<strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong> means and procedures common <strong>in</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>appellative area, <strong>the</strong> means typical <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proprial area are also used. Acharacteristic feature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> anthroponymic system is mak<strong>in</strong>g a dist<strong>in</strong>ctionbetween related and non-related persons. The rule which differentiates<strong>the</strong> nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> relatives and non-relatives <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Christianname with <strong>the</strong> surname also merits our attention. Let us consider a modelscheme x + A <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> b<strong>in</strong>ary system:x + A y + A z + Ax + A1 y + A1 z + A1x + B y + B z + BJán Murár Michal Murár Karol MurárJán Murárik Michal Murárik Karol MurárikJán Točík Michal Točík Karol TočíkIf a Christian name – (determ<strong>in</strong>ant) x, y, z – changes along a horizontal l<strong>in</strong>eand <strong>the</strong> surname (determ<strong>in</strong>é) A, A1, B stays unchanged, consangu<strong>in</strong>eoussibl<strong>in</strong>gs are named. If surname A, A1, B <strong>in</strong> a vertical l<strong>in</strong>e is changed and<strong>the</strong> Christian name does not change, members <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r families are named(see Blanár 1945, 1950). This rule is modified <strong>in</strong> cases <strong>in</strong> which, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>stable b<strong>in</strong>ary nam<strong>in</strong>g system, persons who are not related have <strong>the</strong> samesurname and <strong>in</strong> cases where <strong>the</strong>ir k<strong>in</strong>ship ties are loosened by fur<strong>the</strong>rbranch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> consangu<strong>in</strong>eous relatives. The possibilities for identification(and derivation) are not equal <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first nam<strong>in</strong>g and b<strong>in</strong>ary nam<strong>in</strong> gsystems. In <strong>the</strong> first nam<strong>in</strong>g system, lexical selection and specifically anthroponymicword-form<strong>in</strong>g procedures carry <strong>the</strong> most weight. In <strong>the</strong> b<strong>in</strong>arynam<strong>in</strong>g system, <strong>the</strong> surname is <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g factor <strong>in</strong> express<strong>in</strong>gfamily affiliations. That is why, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> class <strong>of</strong> surnames, <strong>the</strong> group <strong>of</strong>anthro polexemes as well as <strong>the</strong> group <strong>of</strong> anthrop<strong>of</strong>ormants spreads so re-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!