Programs with on-site <strong>and</strong> off-site componentsA majority of the school programs reviewed fit into this category because of the workplacementcomponent. This component <strong>and</strong> the associated acquisition of work readiness skills were integralto the design <strong>and</strong> delivery of these programs. Programs conducted at Doveton, Flinders Peak,Box Hill Senior <strong>and</strong> Eumemmerring Secondary Colleges were typical. Doveton, Hawthorn<strong>and</strong> Footscray City also enjoy close associations with community agencies <strong>and</strong> elements oftheir program are conducted off-site with them.A number of the schools have established links with TAFE <strong>and</strong> community agencies so thatthe programs can incorporate elements of off-site activity with their predominantly on-siteprogram design. In this way, there is a ‘flow’ of activity between the schools <strong>and</strong> TAFE withcommunity agencies mediating <strong>and</strong> enriching the programs in general.The Young Adults Industry <strong>Training</strong> Scheme (YAITS) is an on-site TAFE based literacy <strong>and</strong>numeracy program that caters <strong>for</strong> students referred on by schools <strong>and</strong> community agencies. Itis a useful model <strong>for</strong> a totally on-site education <strong>and</strong> training program within the TAFE sector.Programs delivered entirely off-siteThe Blackwood Adolescent Development Centre program is an example of a school-basedoff-site program because the ‘at risk’ young people are removed from their alienating usualschool environment <strong>and</strong> placed in an environment designed to support their attempts to changeattitude <strong>and</strong> behaviour. There would no doubt be resourcing issues in replicating thisarrangement, however the model would appear to have a potential role in accommodatingsome levels of alienation.A number of worthwhile off-site community agency based programs (off-site in that they arenot either school or TAFE based) have also been reviewed. It is clear from discussions withschools that the expertise available in these agencies is highly valued by those teachers <strong>and</strong>schools <strong>for</strong>tunate enough to have established close working relationships with them. There isa danger that some schools <strong>and</strong> teachers will be put off by initial difficulties (time, funding)they may be confronted with in endeavouring to gain regular or on call association with localagencies. However, ready access to expertise on welfare matters would appear an essentialaspect of any plan to implement programs <strong>for</strong> ‘at risk’ young people regardless of on-site oroff-site locations. This again has clear implications <strong>for</strong> staffing <strong>and</strong> funding resourcing ofthese programs. Programs reviewed included the Melbourne Citymission <strong>Education</strong> SupportProgram, Bridging <strong>Education</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Training</strong> (BEAT) <strong>and</strong> the Jobs Pathways Programs in theGoulburn Valley <strong>and</strong> Ovens Murray Regions.The Young Refugees Project is another model <strong>for</strong> an off-site program. The Project team workswith English Second Language Centres, English Language Schools as well as Migrant YouthAccess Courses <strong>and</strong> Young Adult Migrant <strong>Education</strong> Courses conducted at TAFE level.In the current environment of limited <strong>and</strong> short term funding, it is not surprising to note someanecdotal evidence of competition <strong>and</strong> territorial jousting exists among some communityagencies. It would be essential that any proposal to establish school/agency structures toaccommodate the ‘at risk’ young people be aware of the need to avoid encouraging unnecessaryduplication of services or competition <strong>for</strong> participants.59
6Conclusion <strong>and</strong> RecommendationsMr Gradgrind walked homeward from the school, in a state of considerablesatisfaction. It was his school, <strong>and</strong> he intended it to be a model. He intendedevery child in it to be a model - just as the young Gradgrinds were all models.There were five young Gradgrinds, <strong>and</strong> they were models every one. They had been lecturedat, from their tenderest years….Charles Dickens, commencing Chapter Three of Hard Times, sets up a model of successfullearning which comes out of Gradgrind’s view of successful living: your children should beclones not just of you, the parent, but of each other. Of course, Dickens’ satirical target is justthis soul-destroying modelling of both living <strong>and</strong> learning, since the rest of Hard Times showsthe disintegration of Gradgrind’s view of the world.We live <strong>and</strong> learn in our own hard times. Young adults thought to be ‘at risk’ of poor learningachievements, or who have previously left schooling <strong>and</strong> since shown their vulnerability, bothsocially <strong>and</strong> vocationally, are a challenge <strong>for</strong> any provision of appropriate learning. This issimply because successful learning seems to be inevitably underpinned by successful living,<strong>and</strong> it is a tall order to take on the consequences of a young person’s health, home <strong>and</strong> economicsituation, where these have clearly had, or are currently having, a negative impact upon her orhis learning outcomes.So our research in this Successful Learning Project, even although it has identified programmodels, has eschewed ‘modelling’ of worthwhile provision, on the grounds that this is toomuch like Gradgrind’s ‘cloning’. People are thankfully too different to model the success ofeither living or learning, much less how the <strong>for</strong>mer feeds into the latter.Nevertheless, we are confident that in certain broad areas of provision, namely, throughschooling, in TAFE, <strong>and</strong> in community settings, sufficient evidence of worthwhile programscan be identified so that generalisations can be made.The Literature Review concluded with these four principles of good programs. In listing themagain, we can draw, from the empirical work which has since ensued, a series ofRecommendations which match these. Sub-recommendations show how these can beoperationalised in worthwhile SL (Successful Learning) programs.1. The relevance of (students’) cultural or community context is centralHere, we specified that programs, activities <strong>and</strong> outcomes should be context sensitive, in afairly broad way. One size does not fit all: a diversity of provision will be required, but all will60
- Page 2 and 3:
Providing Education and Trainingfor
- Page 4 and 5:
ForewordThe Commonwealth Government
- Page 6 and 7:
ContentsForeword 3Acknowledgments 4
- Page 8 and 9:
Executive SummarySuccessful learnin
- Page 10: program leaders (at least) to meet
- Page 13 and 14: The major outcome sought from this
- Page 15 and 16: Data was entered in categories unde
- Page 17 and 18: 2Literature ReviewBenchmark 1995Sub
- Page 19 and 20: It is likely that a significant gro
- Page 21 and 22: Indeed, these ‘messages’ have b
- Page 23 and 24: In this we look at labour market sk
- Page 25 and 26: Individuals appear to perform bette
- Page 27 and 28: The research literature on ‘alien
- Page 29 and 30: ConclusionPathways are notoriously
- Page 31 and 32: 3Mapping the FieldThe Stage 1 inter
- Page 33 and 34: Wilderness Enhancement Program, ATL
- Page 35 and 36: them from progressing or even parti
- Page 37 and 38: 4Program ModelsAnumber of the 19 pr
- Page 39 and 40: 3. All students are case managed.4.
- Page 41 and 42: (i) accommodating student diversity
- Page 43 and 44: Teachers involved in the course hav
- Page 45 and 46: There are VET subjects, of which th
- Page 47 and 48: This approach helps the transition
- Page 49 and 50: Young people are referred to the pr
- Page 51 and 52: to become contributing members of t
- Page 53 and 54: Rules are negotiated with the young
- Page 55 and 56: 5Characteristics of Programs That W
- Page 57 and 58: The review processes that already e
- Page 59: attitude to learning and enhanced s
- Page 63 and 64: 2.4 That program activities include
- Page 65 and 66: ReferencesACFE Board (1998) Young a
- Page 67 and 68: Withers, G. and Batten, M. (1995) P
- Page 69 and 70: Successful learning projectsDraft o
- Page 71 and 72: Successful learning projects 1998Dr
- Page 73 and 74: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 75 and 76: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 77 and 78: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 79 and 80: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 81 and 82: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 83 and 84: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 85 and 86: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 87 and 88: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 89 and 90: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 91 and 92: Program and Location- Certificate i
- Page 93 and 94: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 95 and 96: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 97 and 98: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 99 and 100: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 101 and 102: Program and LocationTarget Group, P
- Page 103 and 104: Program and LocationCambodian Youth
- Page 105: APPENDIX IIICURRICULUM OUTLINE FOR