An ergonomic assessment of the airline baggage handler

66fear of injury. In Europe such devices are produced and implemented in European airportfacilities. AirGro, a, European mechanical lifting mechanisms manufacturer, is one ofthe leaders spearheading, this effort (Dell, 1997).5.2.2 Administrative ControlsThe importance of stretching and proper lifting techniques is key towards making animmediate difference in the back and injury rate problem for the baggage handler.Surveyed responses of baggage handlers from various airlines show that over 90% feltthat training on how to lift with restricted postures in a confine space should bemandatory. Approximately 70% of the baggage handlers surveyed felt that stretchingand lifting should be made mandatory for all baggage handlers (Dell, 1997).Interviewing Jason Barrett, a Safety Specialist for a leading Aviation company stated thatbaggage handlers are given training in lifting and stretching, but the practice andreinforcement of this is left to the baggage handlers. This is consistent with Dell'sfinding that although airline companies state that they are placing emphasis of back caretraining, the incident rate of back injury has shown no downwards trend during the threeyear observation and study period. Given this, a renewed emphasis should be placed on,not just the theory of back care, but on the full implementation of these techniques on aregular basis. The lead or floor supervisor should be responsible for the implementation.Another area that should be reviewed with great concern is the weight limit set forpassenger baggage. Thus far studies have shown that the ideal weight for baggagehandlers to lift/carry is about 16 to 20kg (35 to 451bs). Weights higher then this cansignificantly increase the risk of back injury (OHSA, 1988). Unfortunately, most airlineshave their maximum baggage weight set at 32kg (701bs). Surveyed responses from