WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIVAL3.4.1 Importance of <strong>for</strong>est wildlifeInvertebrates, amphibians, insects, fish, reptiles, birds and mammals are all targetedby the bushmeat trade. Forest animals are ecologically fundamental, and many <strong>for</strong>estplants – some of which are economically valuable – are reliant on herbivory andpredation practices <strong>for</strong> pollination, seed dispersal and germination (Williamson, 2001;Serio-Silva & Rico-Gray, 2002; Riley, 2002).In Gabon, regeneration of tree species such as Irvingia gabonensis and Tieghemella sp. islow in areas where animals responsible <strong>for</strong> dipersing their seeds are rare (Medou, 2001).Large-bodied frugivores, the seed dispersal agents of plants with large fruits are chieftargets of bushmeat hunters. Moore (2001) showed that Inga ingoides trees in Bolivia hadsignificantly lower genetic diversity in areas where there sole seed vectors (Spidermonkeys) had been driven to extinction.150 species of fruit among the rumen contents of duikers suggests that they arecrucial <strong>for</strong> seed dispersal (Eves, Stein & BCTF, 2002). Up to 80% of all tree speciescould have their seed dispersal affected by the loss of tropical <strong>for</strong>est frugivores(Peres & van Roosmalen, 2002, cited by Apaza et al, 2002).Over-exploitation of wildlife is expected to alter <strong>for</strong>est composition, architecture andbiomass, as well as altering ecosystem dynamics, such as regrowth and successionpatterns, deposition of soil nutrients and carbon sequestration (Apaza et al, 2002).The ‘empty <strong>for</strong>est syndrome’ there<strong>for</strong>e threatens thefuture not only of species but also of the ecosystemas a whole.3.4.2 Species vulnerabilityResearch suggests that bushmeat use is positivelycorrelated with availability, the most commonly huntedspecies being those that are abundant, proximal tohuman habitation and commonly regarded as pests(Bowen-Jones & Pendry, 1999). Habitat type andlocation are also crucial factors; bushmeatconsumption is more prevalent in <strong>for</strong>est communitiesthan in any other type of habitat (see Graph 3), despiteevidence that tropical <strong>for</strong>ests are relativelyunproductive compared to other habitat types (Kümpel,2005). In agricultural park-boundary areas, whereonly small game is present, the loss from cropraiding can exceed the gain from bushmeat hunting (Naughton-Treves et al, 2003).The most profitable species to hunt are large-bodied animals, weighing more than1kg (<strong>for</strong> example, apes and duikers), which provide more meat per gun cartridge thansmaller species (Kaul et al, 1994; Robinson, 1995). Concurrently, large-bodied animalsare also the most vulnerable to hunting due to their low reproductive rates (Barnes,2002). Even when the most productive species to hunt become scarce, hunting will7654321ForestMosaicSavannaMangrove035RodentsMonkeysAntelopesPangolinsWild birdsSnakesWild pigs & hippoWild catsSnailsChimpanzeesInsectsElephantsGorillasBatsTaxaWSPA/APE ALLIANCEAverage number of meals per person per month600500400300Number of species© Ian Redmond200AmphibiaAvesMammaliaReptilesInsectsAll1000Carribbean IslandsEast AsiaEuropeMesoAmericaNorth AfricaNorth AmericaNorth AsiaOceaniaSouth AmericaSouth and SE AsiaSouth and SW AsiaSub-Saharan AfricaWest/Central Asia34RegionGraph 2: Numberof species hunted<strong>for</strong> wild meat pertaxa pergeographic regionleft Graph 3:Consumption ofbushmeat taxa byhabitat (Source:Wolfe, 2004)THE BROADER BUSHMEAT ISSUEBelow: Mbinzo(smoked caterpillars):nutritious, legalbushmeat <strong>for</strong> sale inKinshasa, DRC.
WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIVALstill be profitable, because small-bodied species will remain common (Fa et al, 2001).The opportunistic nature of hunting keeps pressure on large animals high andaccelerates their extinction (Barnes, 2002; Wilkie and Carpenter, 1999).The vulnerability of a species to hunting is, there<strong>for</strong>e, a product of biologicalcharacteristics, including size, growth rate and reproductive biology, as well asdemographic factors, including population density, distribution and habitat specificity.3.4.3 Geographic repercussionsHunting of wild animals <strong>for</strong> meat is not just an African problem. Twenty-five tonnes of turtlesare exported every week from Sumatra, Indonesia, 1,500 <strong>for</strong>est rats are sold per week in aSulawesi market and 28,000 primates are hunted annually in Loreto, Peru (Milner-Gulland etal, 2003). Referring to wild meat rather than bushmeat reflects the global nature of thisissue. Preliminary research presented in Appendix 1 suggests that 27% of Latin Americanmammals, 50% of Asian mammals and 50% of African mammals recorded amongstbushmeat harvests are categorised as endangered or vulnerable to extinction.The status of many <strong>for</strong>est species is difficult to determine by traditional censustechniques (Ray, Stein & BCTF, 2002). Annual variations mean that accurate estimatescan be made only by several surveys over consecutive years (Barnes, 2002).Table 2:Composition ofbushmeatcaptured in theCongo Basin(Source: Wilkie &Carpenter, 1999)Species loss occurred in Asia first. Many species have been hunted to extinction,including 12 species of mammal in Vietnam since 1975 (Whitfield, 2003). Bushmeatis still consumed in large quantities throughout Asia (Kümpel, 2005). In Indonesia, thetrade in babirusa is purely commercial, with no subsistence motivation at all (Milner-Gulland & Clayton, 2002).In Central Africa, hunting pressure has been specifically identified as a threat to 84Location Ungulates a Primates Rodents OtherInturi <strong>for</strong>est, DRC 1 60 – 95% 5 – 40% 1% 1%Makokou, Gabon 2 58% 19% 14% 9%Diba, Congo 3 70% 17% 9% 4%Ekom, Cameroon 4 85% 4% 6% 5%Brazzaville, Congo 13 76% 8% 6% 10%Ouesso, Congo 5 57% 34% 5% 4%Ndoki and Ngatongo, Congo 6 81 – 87% 11 – 16% 2 – 3% 2 – 3%Dzanga-Sangha, CAR 7 77 – 86% 0% 11 – 12% 2 – 12%Libreville, Port Gentil, Oyem, and Makokou, Gabon 8 34 – 61% 20 – 45% 5 – 27% 3 – 12%Bioko and Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea 9 36 – 43% 23 – 25% 31 – 37% 2 – 4%Dja, Cameroon 12 88% 3% 5% 4%Ekom, Cameroon 10 87% 1% 6% 6%Oleme, Congo 11 62% 38%THE BROADER BUSHMEAT ISSUESpecies Hunted individuals/km 2 Unhunted individuals/km 2 ImpactCephalophus sylvicultur 0 0.03 -100%Gorilla gorilla 0 0.24 -100%Cercocebus albigena 2.5 51.2 -95%Pan troglodytes 0.03 0.36 -92%Cephalophus callipygus 0.6 6.7 -91%Clolbus abyssinicus 0.8 6.8 -88%Tragelaphus spekei 0.005 0.03 -83%Potamochoerus porcus 0.36 1.7 -79%Hyemoschus aquaticus 0.02 0.09 -78%Cercopithecus nictitans 21.9 80.2 -73%Cephalophus dorsalis 2.5 5.8 -57%Cercopithecus pogonias 11.1 19.8 -44%Cercopithecus cephus 12.5 22 -43%Cephalophus monticola 30.4 53 -43%mammalian species and subspecies (IUCN, 2000) (see Tables 2 and 3). Thirty-fourspecies are listed as threatened by extinction, the majority of which are primates (17),and the rest duikers (12), carnivores (4) and rodents (1) (CITES, 2004). Localextinctions have been recorded in populations of leopard Panthera pardus, golden catProfelis aurata and elephant Loxodonta africana, with similar declines expected <strong>for</strong>giant pangolins Smutsia gigantaea and slender-snouted crocodiles Crocodyluscataphractus (various authors cited by Bowen-Jones & Pendry, 1999).Commercial bushmeat hunting in West Africa has already caused local extinctions(BCTF, 2000a).Table 3:Bushmeat speciesdensities in huntedand unhunted<strong>for</strong>est in theCongo Basin(Source: Wilkie &Carpenter, 1999)Kenya provides a model <strong>for</strong> East Africa, where wildlife populations have declined by58% over the past 20 years and the scale of hunting appears to be escalating (BornFree, 2004). Decreasing wildlife populations have intensified hunting ef<strong>for</strong>t,necessitating more sophisticated and unsustainable methods, such as night torchhunting (Barnett, 2000).According to a recent comparative study of 57 and 31 mammalian taxa in the Congoand Amazon Basins respectively, 60% of Congo animals were exploited unsustainably,compared with no Amazon species (Fa et al, 2002). This research also showed that Congomammals must annually produce 93% of their body mass to balance extraction rates,whereas Amazon species need only produce 4%. Conversely, studies in 25 Amazonian<strong>for</strong>est sites showed that even small-scale subsistence hunting reduced the number oflarge-bodied game species (Peres, 2000). Milner-Gulland et al (2003) assert that we canexpect extinctions in even the remote areas of Latin America in the next 10 – 20 years.37WSPA/APE ALLIANCE36
- Page 1 and 2: Recipes for Survival:Controlling th
- Page 3 and 4: 3.4. The effects of bushmeat huntin
- Page 5 and 6: 8RECIPES FOR SURVIVALExecutive Summ
- Page 7 and 8: WSPA/APE ALLIANCE12RECIPES FOR SURV
- Page 9 and 10: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 11 and 12: THE BROADER BUSHMEAT ISSUEThe broad
- Page 13 and 14: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 15 and 16: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 17: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 21 and 22: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 23 and 24: Primate bushmeat:current situation4
- Page 25 and 26: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALPRIMATE BUSHMEA
- Page 27 and 28: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 29 and 30: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 31 and 32: Actions ongoing andtheir effectiven
- Page 33 and 34: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 35 and 36: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 37 and 38: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 39 and 40: OBSTACLES TO CHANGEObstacles to cha
- Page 41 and 42: POTENTIAL SOLUTIONSPotential soluti
- Page 43 and 44: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 45 and 46: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALSupport for cer
- Page 47 and 48: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 49 and 50: WSPA/APE ALLIANCERECIPES FOR SURVIV
- Page 51 and 52: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALto hunters and
- Page 53 and 54: RECIPES FOR SURVIVALAPPENDIXWSPA/AP
- Page 55 and 56: 108RECIPES FOR SURVIVAL.Organisatio
- Page 57 and 58: Gouala, J. (2005). Forum breathes l
- Page 59 and 60: Redmond, I. (2001) Coltan Boom, Gor
- Page 61 and 62: Muntiacus vuquangensis GIANT MUNTJA
- Page 63 and 64: Pteropus ornatus ORNATE FLYING FOXP
- Page 65 and 66: Miopithecus talapoin talapoin (W&C)
- Page 67 and 68: Myosciurus pumilio African pygmy sq
- Page 69 and 70:
Ducula oceanica MICRONESIAN IMPERIA
- Page 71 and 72:
Alectoris chukar Chukar partridgeAl
- Page 73 and 74:
Pelecanus rufescens Pink-backed pel
- Page 75 and 76:
Sacalia quadriocellata Four-eyed tu
- Page 77 and 78:
Rana fukienensisRana grahamiRana gu
- Page 79 and 80:
Rhynchophorus ferrugineus papuanusR
- Page 81 and 82:
Hypoderma bovisOedemagena tarandiRh
- Page 83 and 84:
Ugada giovanninaUgada limbalisUgada
- Page 85 and 86:
PolybiaPolybia diguetanaPolybia ign
- Page 87 and 88:
Anaphe venataAntheua insignataDesme
- Page 89 and 90:
Acrida giganteaAcrida lataAcrida su
- Page 91 and 92:
PhasmatodeaPhasmatidaeEurycantha ho
- Page 93 and 94:
DD South and South and SE AsiaLR/lc
- Page 95 and 96:
VU A2c OceaniaVU A2b+3d Sub-Saharan
- Page 97 and 98:
LR/lc Sub-Saharan AfricaLR/lc Sub-S
- Page 99 and 100:
DD Sub-Saharan AfricaLC Sub-Saharan
- Page 101 and 102:
NT OceaniaVU B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v) Sout
- Page 103 and 104:
LC South and SE AsiaLC EuropeVU A2c
- Page 105 and 106:
LC Sub-Saharan AfricaCR D MesoAmeri
- Page 107 and 108:
EN A1d+2d South and SE AsiaVU A1cd+
- Page 109 and 110:
LC South and SE AsiaNT East Asia, S
- Page 111 and 112:
OceaniaMesoAmerica, Carribbean Isla
- Page 113 and 114:
North AmericaNorth AmericaNorth Ame
- Page 115 and 116:
Sub-Saharan AfricaSub-Saharan Afric
- Page 117 and 118:
MesoAmericaMesoAmericaSouth America
- Page 119 and 120:
Sub-Saharan AfricaSub-Saharan Afric
- Page 121 and 122:
West/Central AsiaEast AsiaSub-Sahar
- Page 123 and 124:
OceaniaOceaniaOceaniaSouth and SE A
- Page 125 and 126:
Papio cynocephalus Yellow baboon LR
- Page 127 and 128:
Berggorilla & Regenwald Stuttgart Z
- Page 129 and 130:
Bushmeat Crisis TaskForceJGI Africa
- Page 131 and 132:
COMIFAC (Council ofMinisters for Fo
- Page 133 and 134:
EAZA EAZA, IFAW EAZA Petition again
- Page 135 and 136:
Heifer International South West Far
- Page 137 and 138:
IUCN Conservation Breeding Speciali
- Page 139 and 140:
MINEF Anti-poaching unit CameroonMi
- Page 141 and 142:
Philadelphia Zoo Bushmeat Education
- Page 143 and 144:
TRAFFIC Review of bushmeat trade in
- Page 145 and 146:
WCS WCS Determining economics ofbus
- Page 147 and 148:
WCS, Bronx Zoo WCS Pattycake Fund W
- Page 149 and 150:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Amer
- Page 151 and 152:
WWF ? Vision for Biodiversity in Co
- Page 153 and 154:
Categories Keywords Dates Contact U
- Page 155 and 156:
Surveys, Research,Community Researc
- Page 157 and 158:
Funding, Research1995 - presentFund
- Page 159 and 160:
Livelihoods, Poverty,2002 Joanna El
- Page 161 and 162:
Coltan, MiningInformation , Educati
- Page 163 and 164:
Policy making, Exchangeinfo, Discus
- Page 165 and 166:
Awareness, Timber,Furniture, Coltan
- Page 167 and 168:
Bushmeat, Trade,Methodologies,Educa
- Page 169 and 170:
Self-sufficiency, Foodsecurity,Food
- Page 171 and 172:
Bushmeat, Utilization,Sustainabilit
- Page 173 and 174:
Population, Density,Foods, Research
- Page 175 and 176:
Law enforcement,Hunting, Densities,
- Page 177 and 178:
Campaigning, Primates,Apes, Awarene
- Page 179 and 180:
Research, Modeling,Birds, Fish, Pri
- Page 181 and 182:
Cameroon governmentMINEF Cameroon M
- Page 183 and 184:
Gorilla HavenGov CongoGov. Cameroon
- Page 185 and 186:
Peace CorpsPeopleandPlanet.netPercy
- Page 187 and 188:
Wisconsin Primate Research Center (
- Page 189 and 190:
11111412131116121112121124121916111
- Page 191 and 192:
122111112 Governments of Republic o
- Page 193 and 194:
2114111122 Primate Conservation1311
- Page 195:
286 World Resources Institute (WRI)